Advanced search
Publication Cover
Journal of Bryology Volume 19, 1997 - Issue 3
Submit an article Journal homepage
43
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Differences in species composition of the bryophyte layer of some Belgian and Dutch pinewoods with and without the invading hepatic Lophocolea semiteres (Lehm.) Mitt.

H. Stieperaere
,
O. Heylen
&
N. Podoor
Pages 425-434 | Published online: 18 Jul 2013

REFERENCES

  • Biermann R, Daniels JA. 1995. Campylopus introflexus (Dicranaceae, Bryopsida) in flechtenreichen Silbergrasfluren Mitteleuropas. In: Daniels JA, Schulz M, Peine I, eds. Flechten Follrnann. Contributions to lichenology in honour of Gerhard Follmann. Cologne: University of Cologne, 493–500.
  • Corley MTV, Crundvvell AC, Dull R, Hill MO, Smith AJE. 1982. Mosses of Europe and the Azores; an annotated list of species, with synonyms from the recent literature. Journal of Bryology 11: 609–689.
  • Corley MFV, Crundwell AC. 1991. Additions and amendments to the mosses of Europe and the Azores. Journal of Bryology 16: 337–356.
  • De Zuttere P, Schumacker IL 1980. L' extension d' Orthodontium lineare Schwägr. subsp. lineare en Belgique et au Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. Dumortiera 14-15: 15-22.
  • Dirkse GM, Martakis GFP. 1992. Effects of fertilizer on bryophytes in Swedish experiments on forest fertilization. Biological Conservation 59: 155–161.
  • Equihua M, Usher MB, 1993. Impact of carpets of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus on Calluna vulgaris regeneration. Journal of Ecology 81: 359–365.
  • Grolle R. 1983. Hepatics of Europe including the Azores: an annotated list of species, with synonyms from the recent literature. Journal of Bryology 12: 403–459.
  • Hedenäs L, Herben T, Rydin H, Söderström L. 1989. Ecology of the invading moss species Orthodontium lineare in Sweden: substrate preference and interactions with other species. Journal of Bryology 15: 565–581.
  • Heylen O. 1995. Onderzoek naar de invloed van de neofyt Lophocolea semiteres (Lehm.) Mitt. (Hepatophyta) op andere mossen in de Kempen. Unpublished thesis, Leuven: Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
  • Hill MO, Gauch HG. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.
  • Hill MO, Preston CD, Smith AJE. 1992. Atlas of the Bryophytes of Britain and Ireland. Volume 2. Mosses (except Diplolepidae). Colchester: Harley Books.
  • Jongman RH, ter Braak CJF, van Tongeren OFR. 1987. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Wageningen: Pudoc.
  • Li Y, Vitt DH. 1995. The dynamics of moss establishment: temporal responses to a moisture gradient. Journal of Bryology 18: 677–687.
  • Londo G. 1976. The decimal scale for relevés of permanent quadrats. Vegetatio 33: 61–64.
  • Margadant WD, During HJ. 1982. Beknopte flora van Nederlandse Blad- en Levermossen. Zutphen: W. J. Thieme & Cie.
  • Økland RH. 1990. Vegetation ecology: theory, methods and applications with reference to fennoscandia. Sommerfeltia, supplement 1: 1–233.
  • Økland RH. 1994. Patterns of bryophyte associations at different scales in a Norwegian boreal spruce forest. Journal of Vegetation Science 5: 127–138.
  • Richards PW. 1963. Campylopus introflexus (Hedw.) Brid. and C. polytrichoides De Not. in the British Isles; a preliminary account. Transactions of the British Bryological Society 4: 404–417.
  • Slack NG. 1982. Bryophytes in relation to ecological niche theory. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 52: 199–217.
  • Slack NG. 1990. Bryophytes and ecological niche theory. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 104: 187–213.
  • Smilauer P. 1992. CanoD raw. Ithaca: Microcomputer Power.
  • Söderström L. 1992. Invasions and range expansions and contractions of bryophytes. In: Bates JI.V. Farmer AM, eds. Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 131–158.
  • Sollman P. 1996. Lophocolea (Dum.) Dum., Kantmos. In: Gradstein SR, van Melick HMH, eds. De Nederlandse Lever'mossen en Hauwmossen. Utrecht: Stichting Uitgeverij K.N.N.V., 209-218.
  • Stieperaere H. 1994. Lophocolea semiteres (Lehm.) Mitt. in Belgium and The Netherlands, another antipodal bryophyte spreading on the European continent. Lindbergia 19: 29–36.
  • Stieperaere H, Jacques E. 1995. The spread of Orthodontium lineare and Campylopus introflexus in Belgium. Belgian Journal of Botany 128: 117–123.
  • ter Braak CJF. 1987. CANOCO — a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination. Ithaca: Microcomputer Power.
  • Touw A, Rubers WV. 1989. De Nederlandse bladmossen. Utrecht: Stichting Uitgeverij K.N.N.V.
  • van der Meulen F, van der Hagen H, Kruijsen B. 1987. Campylopus introflexus. Invasion of a moss in Dutch coastal dunes. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Series C 90: 73–80.
  • Wilson JB, Steel JB, Newman JE, Tangney RS. 1995. Are bryophyte communities different? Journal of Bryology 18: 689–705.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.