Genotypic differentiation between the two related peat mosses, Sphagnum rubellum and S. capillijolium in northern Europe

REFERENCES

• Anderson LE. 1990. A checklist of Sphagnum in North America north of Mexico. Bryologist 93: 500–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews AL. 1913. Sphagnales. North American Flora 15.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews AL. 1958. Notes on North American Sphagnum X. Review. Bryologist 61: 269–276.
   Google Scholar
• Andrus RE. 1979. Sphagnum subtile (Russow) Wamst. and allied species in North America. Systematic Botany 4: 351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum DA, Donoghue M.J. 1995. Choosing among alternative `phylogenetic' species concepts. Systematic Botany 20: 560–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford DJ. 1989. Enzyme electrophoresis and plant systematics. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, eds. lsozymes in plant biology. Portland, Oregon: Dioscorides Press, pp. 146–164.
   Google Scholar
• Cronberg N. 1989. Patterns of variation in morphological characters and isoenzymes in populations of Sphagnum capillifolium (Erh.) Hedw. and S. rubellum Wils. from two bogs in southern Sweden. Journal of Bryology 15: 683–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronberg N. 1995. Isozyme electrophoresis as applied to Sphagnum: An analysis of methodology. Lindbergia 20: 40–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cronberg N. 1996a. Clonal structure and fertility in a sympatric population of the peat mosses, Sphagnum rubellum and Sphagnum capillifolium. Canadian Journal of Botany 74: 1375–1385.
   Google Scholar
• Cronberg N. 1996b. Isozyme evidence of relationships within Sphagnum sect. Acutifolia (Sphagnaceae, Bryophyta). Plant Systematics and Evolution 203: 41–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronberg N. In press. Population structure and interspecific differentiation in two related peat mosses, Sphagnum rubellum and S. capillifolium. Plant Systematics and Evolution.
   Google Scholar
• Crum H. 1984. Sphagnopsida, Sphagnaceae. North American Flora, series 2:11.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels RE. 1993. Phenotypic and genotypic variatiOn in Sphagnum. Advances in Bryology 5: 31–60.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels RE, Eddy A. 1990. Handbook of European Sphagna. Second impression. London: HMSO.
   Google Scholar
• Davis JI, Manos, PS. 1991. Isozyme variation and species delimitation in the Puccinellia nutalliliana complex (Poaceae): An application of the phylogenetic species concept. Systematic Botany 16: 431–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle JJ. 1995. The irrelevance of allele tree topologies for species delimitation, and a non-topological alternative. Systematic Botany 20: 574–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey RM. 1989. Genetic variation in the liverwort Riccia dictyospora (Ricciaceae, Hepaticopsida). Systematic Botany 14: 155–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill MO. 1976. A critical assessment of the distinction between Sphagnum capillaceum (Weiss) Schrank and S. rubellum Wils. in Britain. Journal of Bryology 9: 185–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isoviita P. 1966. Studies on Sphagnum L. I. Nomenclatural revision of the European taxa. Annales Botanici Fennica 7: 157–162.
   Google Scholar
• Lane DM. 1981. Variation in certain taxa of Sphagnum from the atlantic coastal plain. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 49: 169–245.
   Google Scholar
• Luckow M. 1995. Species concepts: assumptions, methods and applications. Systematic Botany 20: 589–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallet J. 1995. A species definition for the modem synthesis. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 294–299.
   Google Scholar
• McQueen CB. 1989a. A biosystematic study of Sphagnum capillifolium sensu lato. Bryologist 92: 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• McQueen CB. 1989b. Species concepts and taxonomic practices in the genus Sphagnum. In: Herben H, McQueen CB, eds. Proceedings of the sixth meeting of the Central and East European Bryological Working Group. Pruhonice, pp 232–239.
   Google Scholar
• Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. American Naturalist 106: 238–292.
   Google Scholar
• Nei, M. 1975. Molecular population genetics and evolution. Amsterdam and New York: North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, KC, Wheeler, QD. 1990. An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6: 211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyholm E. 1969. Illustrated moss flora of Fennoscandia. ii. Musci. Fasc, 6. Stockholm: Swedish Natural Science Research Council.
   Google Scholar
• Odrzykoski U. 1987. Genetic evidence for reproductive isolation between two European ‘forms’ of Conocephalum conicum. Symposia Biologica Hungarica 35: 577–587.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman SMA. 1966. Experimental taxonomy and morphogenesis of some British sphagna. Thesis. University of Exeter.
   Google Scholar
• Rieseberg LH. 1995. The role of hybridization in evolution: old wine in new skins. American Journal of Botany 82: 944–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydin II. 1993. Mechanisms of interactions among Sphagnum species along water-level gradients. Advances in Bryology 5: 153–185.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ. 1994. Systematics of Mielichhoferia (Bryaceae: Musci). III. Hybridization between M. elongata and M. mielichhoferiana. American Journal of Botany 81: 782–790.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, Meagher TR, Harley P. 1987. Electrophoretic evidence of reproductive isolation between two varieties of the moss, Climacium americanum. Heredity 59: 337–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, Gutidn MS, Bernstein BR. 1994. Systematics of tree mosses (Climacium: Musci): Genetic and morphological evidence. Systematic Botany 19: 263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, Rooks PE. 1994. Systematics of Mielichhoferia (Bryaceae: Musci) I. Morphological and genetic analyses of M. elongata and M. mielichhoferiana. Bryologist 97: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Smith ME. 1978. The moss flora of Britain and Ireland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soltis DE, Haufler CH, Darrow DC, Gastony GJ. 1983. Starch gel electrophoresis of ferns: A compilation of grinding buffers, gel and electrode buffers and staining schedules. American Fern Journal 73: 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szweykowsld 1J, Odrzykoski U. 1990. Chemical differentiation of Aneura pinguis (L.) Dum. (Hepaticae, Aneuraceae) in Poland and some comments on the application of enzymatic markers in Brylogy. In: Zinsmeister HD, Mues R, eds. Chemotaxonomy of bryophytes. New York: Academic Press, 437–448.
   Google Scholar
• Weeden NF, Wendel JF. 1989. Genetics of plant isozymes. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, eds. Isozymes in plant biology. Portland: Dioscorides Press, 46–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wendel JF, Weeden NE. 1989. Visualization and interpretation of plant isozymes. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, eds. Isozymes in plant biology. Portland: Dioscorides Press, pp 5–45.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt R. 1985. Species concepts in Bryophytes: Input from population biology. Bryologist 88: 182–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zielinsky R. 1987. Genetic variation and evolution of the liverwort genus Pellia. Szczecin: University of Szcezecin Press.
   Google Scholar