Needle EMG Response of Lumbar Multifidus to Manipulation in the Presence of Clinical Instability

REFERENCES

• Bogduk N. Clinical Anatomy of the Lumbar Spine and Sacrum. 3rd ed. Syndey, Australia: Churchill Livingstone, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Panjabi M, White A. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lip- pincott, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks GE, Fritz JM, Delitto A, Mishock J. Interrater reliability of clinical examination measures for identification of lumbar segmental instability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1858–1864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott JH, McCane B, Herbison P, Moginie G, Chapple C, Hogarty T. Lumbar segmental instability: A criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005;6:56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biely S, Smith S, Silfies S. Clinical instability of the lumbar spine: Diagnosis and intervention. Ortho Phys Ther Prac 2006; 3:11–18.
   Google Scholar
• Cook C, Brismee J, Sizer P. Subjective and objective descriptors of clinical lumbar spine instability: A Delphi study. Man Ther 2006;11:11–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton M. Orthopaedic Examination, Evaluation, & Intervention. St. Louis, MO: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan P. Lumbar segmental “instability”: Clinical presentation and specific stabilizing exercise management. Man Ther 2000;5:2–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettman E. NAIOMT Level 2 Intermediate Lower Quadrant. Berrien Springs, MI: NAIOMT, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows J. NAIOMT Level 3 Advanced Lower Quadrant. Dallas, TX: NAIOMT, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Paris S. Physical signs of instability. Spine 1985;10:277–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson C, Hodges P, Hides J. Therapeutic Exercise for Lumbopelvic Stabilization. 2nd ed. Sydney, Australia: Churchill Livingstone, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner A, Gill N, Buscema C, Kiesel K. Improved activation of lumbar multifidus following spinal manipulation. J Ortho Sports Phys Ther 2007;37:613–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassisi J, Robinson M, O’Connor P, MacMillan M. Trunk strength and lumbar paraspinal muscle activity during isometric exercise in chronic low back pain. Spine 1993;18:245–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danneels L, van der Straeten G, Cambier D, Witvrouw E, Cuyper H. CT imaging of trunk muscles in chronic low back pain patients and healthy control subjects. Euro Spine J 2000;9:266–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm S, Indahl A, Solomonow M. Sensorimotor control of the spine. J Electro Kines 2002;12:219–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elfving B, Dedering A, Nemeth G. Lumbar muscle fatigue and recovery in patients with long-term low back trouble: Electromyography and health related factors. Clin Biomech 2003;18:619–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges P, Mosely G. Pain and motor control of the lumbopelvic region: Effect and possible mechanisms. J Electro Kines 2003;13: 361–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gedalia U, Solomonow M, Zhou B, Baratta R, Lu Y, Harris M. Biomechanics of increased exposure to lumbar injury caused by cyclic loading. Part 2. Recovery of reflexive muscular stability with rest. Spine 1999; 24:2461–2467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges P, Richardson C. Altered trunk muscle recruitment in people with low back pain with upper limb movement at different speeds. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999;80: 1005–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges P, Richardson C. Inefficient muscular stabilization of the lumbar spine associated with low back pain: A motor control evaluation of transversus abdominus. Spine 1996;21:2640–2650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vleeming A, Mooney V, Dorman T, Snijders C, Stoeckart R. Movement, Stability & Low Back Pain: The Essential Role of the Pelvis. Sydney, Australia: Churchill Livingstone, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Meadows J. Orthopedic Differential Diagnosis in Physical Therapy. St. Louis, MO: McGraw-Hill, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Hides J, Jull G, Richardson C. Long-term effects of specific stabilizing exercises for firstepisode low back pain. Spine 2001;26:243–248.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jull G, Richardson C. Motor control problems in patients with spinal pain: A new direction for therapeutic exercise. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000;23:115–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wohlfart D, Jull G, Richardson C. The relationship between dynamic and static function of abdominal muscles. Aust Physiother 1993;39:9–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodges P, Cresswell A, Daggfeldt K, Thor- stensson A. Three-dimensional preparatorytrunk motion precedes assymetrical upper limb movement. Gait Posture 2000;11:92–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosely G, Hodges P, Gandevia S. Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus are differentially active during voluntary arm movements. Spine 2002;27:29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Ng J, Richardson C. Reliability of electromyographic power spectral analysis of back muscle endurance in healthy subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:259–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson M, Solomonow M, Zhou B, Baratta R, Harris M. Multifidus EMG and tensionrelaxation recovery after prolonged static lumbar flexion. Spine 2001;7:715–723.
   Google Scholar
• Hides J, Richardson C, Jull G. Multifidus muscle recovery is not automatic after resolution of acute, first-episode low back pain. Spine 1996;21:2763–2769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleland J, Stowell T, Selleck B. Short-term effects of thoracic manipulation on lower trapezius muscle strength. J Man Manip Ther 2004;12:82–90.
   Google Scholar
• Keller T, Colloca C. Mechanical force spinal manipulation increases trunk muscle strength assessed by electromyography: A comparative clinical trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2000;23:585–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe S, Reese H, Sydenham R. Effect of high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation on cervical spine muscle strength. J Man Manip Ther 2006;14:152–158.
   Google Scholar
• Gill N, Teyhen D, Lee I. Improved contraction of the transversus abdominus immediately following lumbopelvic manipulation: A case study using real-time ultrasound imaging. Man Ther 2007;3:280–285.
   Google Scholar
• Herzog W, Scheele D, Conway P. Electromyographic responses of back and limb muscles associated with spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 1999;24:146–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter E, McMorland G, Herzog W, Bray R. Decrease in quadriceps inhibition after sacroiliac joint manipulation in patients with anterior knee pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22:149–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colloca C, Keller T. Stiffness and neuromuscular reflex response of the human spine to postero-anterior manipulative thrusts in patients with low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001;24:489–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George S, Bishop M, Bialosky J, Zeppieri G, Robinson M. Immediate effects of spinal manipulation on thermal pain sensitivity. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2006;7:68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenborn F, Evjenth O. Manual Mobilization of the Joints. Volume 2: The Spine. 4th ed. Minneapolis, MN: OPTP, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Kim BJ, Date ES, Derby R, et al. Electromyographic technique for lumbar multifidus examination: A comparison of previous techniques used to localize the multifidus. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1325–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall R, Werner RA. Interrater reliability of the needle examination in lumbosacral radiculopathy. Muscle Nerve 2006;34:238–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stokes IA, Henry SM, Single RM. Surface EMG electrodes do not accurately record from lumbar multifidus muscles. Clin Bio- mech 2003;18:9–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettman E. Manipulative Thrust Techniques: An Evidence-Based Approach. Abbotsford, Canada: Aphema, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pettman E. NAIOMT Level 3 Advanced Lower Quadrant. Berrien Springs, MI: NAIOMT, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM. Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: A systematic review and best evidence synthesis. Spine 2004;4:335–356.
   Google Scholar
• Roy MA, Doherty TJ. Reliability of handheld dynamometry in assessment of knee extensor strength after hip fracture. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83:813–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang CY, Olson SL, Protas EJ. Test-retest strength reliability: Hand-held dynamome- try in community-dwelling elderly fallers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:811–815.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilmer DD, McCrory MA, Wright NC, Rosko RA, Kim HR, Aitkens SG. Hand-held dynamometry reliability in persons with neuropathic weakness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:1364–1368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudreault N, Arsenault A, Larivière C, DeSerres S, Rivard C. Assessment of the paraspinal muscles of subjects presenting an idiopathic scoliosis: An EMG pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Dis 2005;6:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makofshy H, Panicker S, Abbruzzese J, et al. Immediate effect of grade IV inferior hip joint mobilization on hip abductor torque: A pilot study. J Man Manip Ther 2007;15:103–111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flynn T, Fritz J, Whitman J, Wainner R, Ma- gel J, Rendeiro D. A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine 2002;27: 2835–2843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar