References
- Luria SE. A test for penicillin sensitivity and resistance in staphylococcus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1946; 61: 46–51.
- Simard P, Bergeron MG. Inoculum size effect on the MIC of cefoperazone, moxalactam, cefotaxime, cefoxitin and cephalothin for 118 strains of Haemophilus influenzae includ-ing ‘tolerant’ micro-organisms. J Antimicrob Chemother 1982; 10: 397–402.
- Davey PG, Barza M. The inoculum effect with Gram-negative bacteria in vitro and in vivo. J Antimicrob Chemother 1987; 20: 639–44.
- Sahm DF, Torries C. Effects of medium and inoculum variations on screening for high-level aminoglycoside resis-tance in Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Microbiol 1988; 26: 250–56.
- Eng RHK, Smith SM, Cherubin C. Inoculum effect of new b-lactam antibiotics on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1984; 26: 42–7.
- Jacobus NV, Tally FP, Barza M. Antimicrobial spectrum of Win 49375. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1984; 26: 104–7.
- Bulger RR, Washington II JA. Effect of inoculum size and beta-lactamase production on in vitro activity of new cephalosporins against Haemophilus species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1980; 17: 393–6.
- Corrado ML, Landesman SH, Cherubin CE. Influence of inoculum size on activity of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, mox-alactam, piperacillin, and N-formimidoyl thienamycin (MK 0787) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1980; 18: 893–6.
- Amsterdam D. Susceptibility testing of antimicrobials in liquid media. In: Lorian V, ed. Antibiotics in Laboratory Medicine. 4th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1996: 53–105.
- Metzler CM, Elfring GL, McEwen AJ. A users manual for NONLIN and associated programs, The Upjohn Company, Kalamazoo, MI, 1974.