Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Endoscopic and Minimally Invasive Surgery

References

• Targarona EM, Balague C, Knook MM, Trias M. Laparoscopic surgery and surgical infection. Br J Surg 2000; 87 (5): 536–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miner DW, Levine RL. Microbiologic effects of atmos-pheric conditions used in operative laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 1993; 38 (7): 531–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng PC, Chua AN, Swanson MS, Koutlas TC, Chitwood WR, Elbeery JR. Anterior thoracotomy wound complications in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69 (5): 1338-40; discussion 1340-1.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne JG, Karavas AN, Cohn LH, Adams DH. Minimal access aortic root, valve, and complex ascending aortic surgery. Curr Cardiol Rep 2000; 2 (6): 549–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regadas FS, Rodrigues LV, Nicodemo AM, Siebra JA, Furtado DC, Regadas SM. Complications in laparoscopic col-orectal resection: main types and prevention. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1998; 8 (3): 189–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• den Hoed PT, Boelhouwer RU, Veen HF, Hop WC, Bruining HA. Infections and bacteriological data after laparo-scopic and open gallbladder surgery. J Hosp Infect 1998; 39 (1): 27–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue JH, Farnell MB, Grant CS, van Heerden JA, Wahlstrom HE, Sarr MG, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystecto-my: early Mayo Clinic experience. Mayo Clin Proc 1992; 67 (5): 449–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippert H, Gastinger J. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy. Conclusions of a large prospective multicenter quality assurance study in Germany. Chemotherapy 1998; 44 (5): 355–63.
   Google Scholar
• Frantzides CT, Edmiston CE, Sykes A. Antibiotic pro-phylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is there really a need? In Program and Abstracts of the Sixth European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Seville 1993. Abstract 982, p234.
   Google Scholar
• Manger T, Wolff H. [Experiences and results in 200 laparoscopic cholecystectomies]. Zentralbl Chir 1991; 116 (20): 1173–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alveyn CG. Antimicrobial prophylaxis during biliary endoscopic procedures. J Antimicrob Chemother 1993; 31 Suppl B: 101-5.
   Google Scholar
• Sauter G, Grabein B, Huber G, Mannes GA, Ruckdeschel G, Sauerbruch T. Antibiotic prophylaxis of infec-tious complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopan-creatography. A randomized controlled study. Endoscopy 1990; 22 (4): 164–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alveyn CG, Robertson DA, Wright R, Lowes JA, Tillotson G. Prevention of sepsis following endoscopic retro-grade cholangiopancreatography. J Hosp Infect 1991; 19 Suppl C: 65-70.
   Google Scholar
• Davis AJ, Kolios G, Alveyn CG, Robertson DA. Antibiotic prophylaxis for ERCP: a comparison of oral ciprofloxacin with intravenous cephazolin in the prophylaxis of high-risk patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 1998; 12 (3): 207–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris A, Chan AC, Torres-Viera C, Hammett R, Carr-Locke D. Meta-analysis of antibiotic prophylaxis in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Endoscopy 1999; 31 (9): 718–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998; 186 (5): 545–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conven-tional appendectomy. Am J Surg 1999; 177 (3): 250–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingler A, Henle KP, Beller S, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy does not change the incidence of postoperative infectious complications. Am J Surg 1998; 175 (3): 232–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAnena OJ, Austin O, O'Connell PR, Hederman WP, Gorey TF, Fitzpatrick J. Laparoscopic versus open appen-dicectomy: a prospective evaluation. Br J Surg 1992; 79 (8): 818–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley RC, Hall TJ, Muakkassa FF, Anglin B, Rhodes RS, Scott-Conner CE. Laparoscopic appendectomy: is it worth it? Am Surg 1994; 60 (1): 30–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putz A, Bogesits R, Muller W, Werner C. [Laparoscopic appendectomy as a routine procedure]. Infection 1993; 21 (Suppl 1): S54–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khairullah Z, Huber DH, Gonzales B. Declining mortal-ity in international sterilization services. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1992; 39 (1): 41–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mage G, Wattiez A, Chapron C, et al. [Laparoscopic hysterectomy. Results in 44 cases]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1992; 21 (4): 436-44.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey JM, Buffenmyer C, Rycheck RR, Yee R, McVay J, Harger JH. Surveillance for postoperative infections in out-patient gynecologic surgery. Infect Control 1986; 7 (2): 54–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loffer FD, Pent D. Indications, contraindications and complications of laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1975; 30 (7): 407–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Penfield AJ. How to prevent complications of open laparoscopy. J Reprod Med 1985; 30 (9): 660–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargreave TB, Sotto H, Rikken GH, et al. European collaborative study of antibiotic prophylaxis for transurethral resection of the prostate. Eur Urol 1993; 23 (4): 437–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavis SA, Miller JB, Golji H, Dunshee CJ. Comparison of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in uncomplicated transurethral resection of the prostate. J Urol 1992; 147 (5): 1303–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viitanen J, Talja M, Jussila E, et al. Randomized con-trolled study of chemoprophylaxis in transurethral prostatecto-my. J Urol 1993; 150 (5 Pt 2): 1715-7.
   Google Scholar
• Hofer DR, Schaeffer AJ. Use of antimicrobials for patients undergoing prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 1990; 17 (3): 595–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadallah MF, Pervez A, el-Shahawy MA, et al. Peritoneoscopic versus surgical placement of peritoneal dialy-sis catheters: a prospective randomized study on outcome. Am J Kidney Dis 1999; 33 (1): 118–22.
   Google Scholar
• Gadallah MF, Ramdeen G, Mignone J, Patel D, Mitchell L, Tatro S. Role of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in pre-venting postoperative peritonitis in newly placed peritoneal dialysis catheters. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 36 (5): 1014–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kieser C. A review of the complications of arthroscopic knee surgery. Arthroscopy 1992; 8 (1): 79–83.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bamford DJ, Paul AS, Noble J, Davies DR. Avoidable complications of arthroscopic surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1993; 38 (2): 92–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Armstrong RW, Bolding F, Joseph R. Septic arthritis following arthroscopy: clinical syndromes and analysis of risk factors. Arthroscopy 1992; 8 (2): 213–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayliffe G. Decontamination of minimally invasive surgical endoscopes and accessories. J Hosp Infect 2000; 45 (4): 263–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson LL, Shneider DA, Austin MD, Goodman FG, Bullock JM, DeBruin JA. Two per cent glutaraldehyde: a dis-infectant in arthroscopy and arthroscopic surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982; 64 (2): 237–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huezo CM, DeStefano F, Rubin GL, Ory HW. Risk of wound and pelvic infection after laparoscopic tubal steriliza-tion: instrument disinfection versus sterilization. Obstet Gynecol 1983; 61 (5): 598–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fengler TW, PahIke H, Sisson S, Kraas E. The clinical suitability of laparoscopic instrumentation. A prospective clini-cal study of function and hygiene. Surg Endosc 2000; 14 (4): 388–94.
   Google Scholar
• Rey TR, Axon A, Budzynska A, Kruse A, Nowak A. Guidelines of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (E. S. G. E.) antibiotic prophylaxis for gastrointestinal endoscopy. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Endoscopy 1998; 30 (3): 318–24.
   Google Scholar
• Mehta DK (Ed). British National Formulary. 39. Publ. British Medical Association, Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain. 2000: 250-1.
   Google Scholar