Device-Related Infections in Critically Ill Patients. Part I: Prevention of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections

REFERENCES

• Richards MJ, Edwards JR, Culver DH, Gaynes RP, and the NNIS. Nosocomial infections in medical intensive care in USA. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 887–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konig C, Schwank S, Blaser J. Factors compromising antibiotic activity against biofilms of Staphylococcus epider-midis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2001; 20: 20–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlan RM. Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 9: 881–90.
   Google Scholar
• Shing-Naz N, Sprague BM, Patel KM, Pollack MM. Risk assessment and standardized nosocomial infection rate in criti-cally ill children. Crit Care Med 2000; 28: 2069–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calil R, Marba ST, von Nowakonski A, Tresoldi AT. Reduction in colonization and nosocomial infection by multire-sistant bacteria in a neonatal unit after institution of education-al measures and restriction in the use of cephalosporins. Am J Infect Control 2001; 29: 133–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemmen SW, Zolldann D, Gastmeier P, Lutticken R. Implementing and evaluating a rotating surveillance system and infection control guidelines in 4 intensive care units. Am J Infect Control 2001; 29: 89–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson ML Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. Part I. Intravascular device-related infections: an overview. The Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1996; 24: 262–77.
   Google Scholar
• Larson EL, Aiello AE, Bastyr J, et al. Assessment of two hand hygiene regimens for intensive care unit personnel. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 944–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girou E, Loyeau S, Legrand P, Oppein F, Brun-Buisson C. Efficacy of handrubbing with alcohol based solution versus standard handwashing with antiseptic soap: randomised clini-cal trial. Br Med J 2002; 325: 362–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hirschmann H, Fux L, Podusel J, et al. The influence of hand hygiene prior to insertion of peripheral venous catheters on the frequency of complications. J Hosp Infect 2001; 49: 199–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas A, Flament P, Pardou A, Deplano A, Dramaix M, Struelens MJ. Central venous catheter-related bacteraemia in critically ill neonates: risk factors and impact of a prevention programme. J Hosp Infect 1998; 40: 211-24.
   Google Scholar
• Slota M, Green M, Farley A, Janosky J, Carcillo J. The role of gown and glove isolation and strict hand washing in the reduction of nosocomial infection in children with solid organ transplantation. Crit Care Med 2001; 29: 405–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humar A, Ostromecki A, Direnfeld J, et al. Prospective randomised trial of 10% povidone-iodine versus 0.5% tincture of chlorhexidine as cutaneous antisepsis for pre-vention of central venous catheter infection. Clin Infect Dis 2000; 31: 1001–7.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA, Saint S. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vas-cular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 792–801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little K, Palmer D. Central line exit sites: which dress-ing? Nurs Stand 1998; 12: 42–44.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nikoletti S, Leslie G, Gandossi S, Coombs G, Wilson R. A prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing transparent polyurethane and hydrocolloid dressings for cen-tral venous catheters. Am J Infect Control 1999; 27: 488–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Leary M and Bihari D. Central venous catheters. Time for a change? Br Med J 1998; 316: 1918–9.
   Google Scholar
• Cook D, Randolph A, Kernerman P, et al. Central venous catheter replacement strategies: a systematic review of the literature. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1417–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safdar N, Maki DG. Inflammation at the insertion site is not predictive of catheter-related bloodstream infection with short-term, noncuffed central venous catheters. Crit Care Med 2002; 30 (12): 2632–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahieu LM, De Dooy JJ, Lenaerts AE, Ieven MM, De Muynck AO. Catheter manipulations and the risk of catheter-associated bloodstream infection in neonatal intensive care unit patients. J Hosp Infect. 2001; 48: 20–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraenkel DJ, Rickard C, Lipman J. Can we achieve consensus on central venous catheter-related infections? Anaesth Intensive Care 2000; 28: 475–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ljungman P, Hagglund H, Bjorkstrand B, Lonnqvist B, Ringden O. Peroperative teicoplanin for prevention of gram-positive infections in neutropenic patients with indwelling cen-tral venous catheters: a randomised, controlled study. Support Care Cancer 1997; 5: 485–8.
   Google Scholar
• Raad II, Hachem RY, Abi-Said D, et al. A prospective crossover randomised trial of novobiocin and rifampin prophy-laxis for the prevention of intravascular catheter infections in cancer patients treated with interleukin-2. Cancer 1998; 82: 403–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ma Ty, Yoshinaka R, Banaag A, Johnson B, Davis S, Berman SM. Total parenteral nutrition via multilumen catheters does not increase the risk of catheter-related sepsis: a randomised, prospective study. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27: 500–3.
   Google Scholar
• Mermel LA. Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132: 391–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach A, Eberhardt H, Frick A, Schmidt H, Bottiger BW, Martin E. Efficacy of silver-coating central venous catheters in reducing bacterial colonization. Crit Care Med 1999; 27: 515–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswald M, Lugauer S, Regenfus A, et al. Reduced rates of catheter-associated infection by use of a new silver-impregnated central venous catheter. Infection 1999; 27 (Suppl): S56-60.
   Google Scholar
• Stoiser B, Kofler J, Staudinger T, et al. Contamination of central venous catheters in immunocompromised patients: a comparison between two different types of central venous catheters. J Hosp Infect 2002; 50 (3): 202–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maki DG, Stolz SM, Wheeler S, Mermel LA. Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A ran-domised, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 257–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George SJ, Vuddamalay P, Boscoe MJ. Antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters reduce the incidence of bacterial colonization and associated infection in immunocom-promised transplant patients. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1997; 14: 428–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tennenberg S, Lieser M, McCurdy B, et al. A prospec-tive randomised trial of an antibiotic- and antiseptic-coated central venous catheter in the prevention of catheter-related infections. Arch Surg 1997; 132: 1348–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heard SO, Wagle M, Vijayakumar E, et al. Influence of triple-lumen central venous catheters coated with chlorhexi-dine and silver sulfadiazine on the incidence of catheter-related bacteraemia. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158: 81–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collin GR. Decreasing catheter colonization through the use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter: a continuous quality improvement project. Chest 1999; 115: 1632–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannan M, Juste RN, Umasanker S, et al. Antiseptic-bonded central venous catheters and bacterial colonisation. Anaesthesia 1999; 54: 868–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng WH, Ko WJ, Wang JT, Chang SC, Hsueh PR, Luh KT. Evaluation of antiseptic-impregnated central venous catheters for prevention of catheter-related infection in inten-sive care unit patients. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000; 38: 1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger K, Osthaus A, Heine J, et al. Efficacy of a ben-zalkonium chloride-impregnated central venous catheter to prevent catheter-associated infection in cancer patients. Chemotherapy 2001; 47: 50–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranucci M, Isgrd G, Giomarelli PP, et al. Impact of oligon central venous catheters on catheter colonization and catheter-related bloodstream infection. Crit Care Med 2003; 31 (1): 52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raad I, Darouiche R, Dupuis J, et al. Central venous catheters coated with minocycline and rifampin for the pre-vention of catheter-related colonization and bloodstream infec-tions. A randomised, double-blind trial. The Texas Medical Center Catheter Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1997; 127: 267–74.
   Google Scholar
• Darouiche RO, Raad II, Heard SO, et al. A compari-son of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. Catheter Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach A. antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 1761.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pierce CM, Wade A, Mok Q. Heparin-bonded central venous lines reduce thrombotic and infective complications in critically ill children. Intensive Care Med 2000; 26: 967–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timsit JF, Bruneel F, Cheval C, et al. Use of tunnelled femoral catheters to prevent catheter-related infection. A ran-domised, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 729–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrer J, De Jonghe B, Golliot F, et al. Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterisation in critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. JAMA 2001; 286: 700–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar