The Overlooked and Understudied Onomastic Hyphen

References

• Benbow, John. 1937. Manuscript and Proof. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brae, Elliott. 1992. “So Why the Hyphen?” The Atlanta Journal and Constitution, 28 October, p. J2.
   Google Scholar
• Brightman, Joan. 1994. “Why Hillary Chooses Rodham Clinton.” American Demographics 16: 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, Maurice. 1984. “New York Historical Society, Proud of Its Hyphen, Celebrates Its History.” The New York Times, 19 November, p. B1.
   Google Scholar
• “Concert for Sept. 11.” 2001. Daily News [New York], 4 December, p. 43.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, Fiona. 2002. “Mother Has Last Word on Baby’s Name.” The Daily Telegraph [Sydney], 4 March, p. 9.
   Google Scholar
• Corser, J. E. 2001. “What’s in a Name? Maclean’s, 14 May, p. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Fowkes, Robert A. 1981. “Welsh Naming Practices, with a Comparative Look at Cornish.” Names 29: 265–72.
   Google Scholar
• Good, Owen S. 2001. “Hyphen Huff: Tot’s Identity on the Line. ” Rocky Mountain News [Denver], 16 November, p. 4A.
   Google Scholar
• Gyulai, Linda. 2002. Montreal Gazette, 23 March, p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, William B. 1996. Place Names of Atlantic Canada. Toronto: Univ. of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heald, Tim. 1998. “What’s in a Name?” The Times [London], 3 October, ed. 1F3, p. 19.
   Google Scholar
• Hopfensperger, Chris. 2001. “We Stand Corrected.” The Washington Post, 24 June, p. B8.
   Google Scholar
• “The IMA Commission on New Minerals and Mineral Names: Procedures and Guidelines on Mineral Nomenclature.” 1998. http://www.minsocam.org/MSA/AmMin/Special_Features/nickel.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Estonian Language. 1997. Toponymie Guidelines for Map and Other Editors. 2nd ed. http://www.eki.ee/knn/ungegn/un7_gdl.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, David R., and Laurie Scheuble. 1995. “Women’s Marital Naming in Two Generations: A National Study.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 57: 724–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, Charles, and David Williamson, eds. 2000. Debrett’s Peerage and Baronetage. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay, Sue. 2001. “Parents’ Dispute over Tot’s Name Ends with a Hyphen.” Rocky Mountain News [Denver], 30 November, p. 4A.
   Google Scholar
• Little, Greta. 1984. “Punctuation. ” Research in Composition and Rhetoric. Ed. Michael Moran and Ronald Lunsford. Westport, CN: Greenwood, 371–98.
   Google Scholar
• Little, Greta. 1986. “Punctuation as a Linguistic Phenomenon: Research Issues.” The SECOL Review 10: 69–91.
   Google Scholar
• Lombard, Frederica K. “The Law on Naming Children: Past, Present and Occasionally Future.” Names 32: 129–37.
   Google Scholar
• McArthur, Tom. 1992. “Hyphen. ” The Oxford Companion to the English Language. Oxford and New York. Oxford Univ. Press, 491–92.
   Google Scholar
• McCourt, Frank. 2002. Review of Tom Hayden, Irish on the Inside: In Search of the Soul of Irish America. Los Angeles Times, 6 January, p. R3.
   Google Scholar
• McIntosh, Ronald, and David Fawthrop. 2000. Hyphenation. 3rd ed. http://www/hyphenologist.co.uk/book/book-ed3.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Mitrovich, George, and Timothy Winters. 2001. “Separated by a Hyphen.” The San Diego Union-Tribune, 11 October, pp. B -11, B–7, B–13.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, Nancy. 2000. “A Hyphen Away from Cyberporn.” The Seattle Times, 19 May, p. B1.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Thomas E. 1999. “The Law and Newborns’ Personal Names in the United States.” Names 47: 339–64).
   Google Scholar
• “Nearly Identical Net-address Registrations Revoked.” 2000. The Seattle Times, 7 January, p. C6.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, Valerie J. 1997. “’90s Family.” Los Angeles Times, 27 April, p. E2.
   Google Scholar
• Nevin, Charles. 2001. “Captain Moonlight Column.” Independent on Sunday [London], 16 September, p. 24.
   Google Scholar
• “Northern Territory Rules of Nomenclature.” 1995. http://www.lpe.nt.gov.au./place/rules.HTM.
   Google Scholar
• Orth, Donald J., and Roger L. Payne. 1997. Principles, Policies, and Procedures: Domestic Geo graphic Names. http://mapping.usgs.gov/www/gnis/pppdgn.html.
   Google Scholar
• “Paragould. ” n.d. http://www.delta.byways.com/cities_towns/detail.asp?city_id=28.
   Google Scholar
• Parkes, M. B. 1993. Pause and Effect: An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pendreigh, Brian. 1994. “What’s in a Moniker? Brian Pendreigh Looks at Name Dropping When it Comes to the Hyphen.” The Scotsman, 9 March, n.p.
   Google Scholar
• Pett, Saul. 1990. “The Role of the Hyphen.” Los Angeles Times, 2 December, p. U3.
   Google Scholar
• “Phoenix-Mesa: What’s in a Hyphen?” 1998. The Arizona Republic, 18 June, p. EV6.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, Karen Swallow. 1997. “Just Spell My Name Right—and That’s without the Hyphen, Please.” The Buffalo News, 14 December, p. H2.
   Google Scholar
• Rayburn, Alan. n.d. “Place-names of Canada” [a sample entry from The Canadian & World Encyclopedia]. http://www.tceplus.com/names.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, Stephen R. 1998. “Paleography: Punctuation.” http://www.ualberta.ca/ ~ sreimer/ms-course.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Rozansky, Michael L. 1993. “Phone Firms; New Names Will Have a Familiar Ring.” Philadelphia Inquirer, 3 September, p. C2.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman, Karen. 1998. “School Boards Cry f-o-u-1 Over Hyphen Rule. ” The Gazette [Montreal], 25 March, p. A3.
   Google Scholar
• Tabakoff, Jenny. 2001. “In the Name of the Father . . .or the Mother?” Sydney Morning Herald, 1 June, p. 15.
   Google Scholar
• “Thirsk and Easingwold. ” n.d. http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/north_east_england_history_page/Thirsk.htm.
   Google Scholar
• “Toponymic Guidelines for Map and Other Editors—Estonia.” 1997. 2nd ed. http://www.eki.ee/knn/ungegn/un7_gdl.htm.
   Google Scholar
• “-?.” 1997. The Daily Telegraph, 28 February, p. 29.
   Google Scholar