Occupational Exposures and Risks of Spontaneous Abortion among Female Veterinarians

References

• Anonymous. Veterinary Demographic Data Resource. Schaum-berg, Illinois: American Veterinary Medical Association, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins P, Schenker MB, Green R, Samuels S. Prevalence of hazardousexposures in veterinary practice. Am J Ind Med. 1989; 16: 55–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murnane TG, Morris JS. Special health considerations for women veterinarians. In: Heidelbaugh ND, Murnane TG, Rosser WW (eds). Health Hazards in Veterinary Practice. 2nd ed. Schaum-burg, Illinois: American Veterinary Medical Association, 1989: 88–9.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. In: Heidelbaugh ND, Murnane TG, Rosser WW (eds). Health Hazards in Veterinary Practice. 2nd ed. Schaum-burg, Illinois: American Veterinary Medical Association, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan JE, Sarvaideo RJ, Thalken CE. Carcinogens, teratogens, and mutagens: their impact on occupational health, particularly for women in veterinary medicine. J Env Health. 1983; 46: 19–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson JA, Buchan RM, ReifJS. Effect of waste anesthetic gas and vapor exposure on reproductive outcome in veterinary person-nel. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1987; 48: 62–6.
   Google Scholar
• Schenker MB, Samuels SJ, Green RS, Wiggins PW. Adverse reproductiveoutcomes among female veterinarians. Am J Epi-demiol. 1990; 132: 96–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn TL, Daling JR, Starzyk PM. Fetal death and maternal oc-cupation: an analysis of birth records in the state of Washington. J Occup Med. 1984; 26: 676–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schardein JL. Chemically Induced Birth Defects. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Gold CTK, Beran GW. Occupational hazards to pregnant veteri-narians. Iowa State Vet. 1983; 45: 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Moore J, Davis Y, Kaczmarek R. An overview of occupational hazardsamong veterinarians, with particular reference to pregnant women. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1993; 54: 113–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restrepo M, Munoz N, Day NE, Parra JE, de Romero L, Nguyen-Dinh X. Prevalence of adverse reproductive outcomes in a populationoccupationally exposed to pesticides in Colombia. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1990; 16: 232–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rom WN, Infante PF, Legator MS (eds). Effects of lead on reproduction. Washington, D.C.: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1980: 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Sikorski R, Juszkiewicz T, Paszkowski T, Szprengier-Juszkiewicz T. Women in dental surgeries: reproductive hazards in occupational exposure to metallic mercury. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1987; 59: 551–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindbohm M, Taskinen H, Sallmen M, Hemminki K. Sponta-neous abortions among women exposed to organic solvents. Am J Ind Med. 1990; 17: 449–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipscomb JA, Fenster L, Wrensch M, Shusterman D, Swan S. Preg-nancy outcomes in women potentially exposed to occupational solvents and women working in the electronics industry. J Occup Med. 1991; 33: 597–604.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John EM, Savitz DA, Shy CM. Spontaneous abortions among cos-metologists. Epidemiology. 1994; 5: 147–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Home HW, Kundsin RB. Results of infertility studies in 1001 DESexposedand non-DES-exposed consecutive patients. Int J Fertil. 1985; 30: 46–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandberg EC, Riffle NL, Higdon JV, Getman CE. Pregnancy outcomein women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in uteroj Obstet Gy-necol. 1981; 140: 194-205.
   Google Scholar
• Taskinen H, Lindbohm M, Hemminki K. Spontaneous abortions among women working in the pharmarceutical industry. Br J Ind Med. 1986; 43: 199–205.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hemminki K, Mutanen P, Saloniemi I, Niemi N, Vainio J. Spon-taneous abortions in hospital staff engaged in sterilization of instrumentswith chemical agents. Br Med J. 1982; 285: 1461–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemminki K, Vineis P. Extrapolation of the evidence on teratogenicityof chemicals between humans and experimental animals: chemicals other than drugs. Teratogenesis Carcinog Mutagen. 1985; 5: 251–318.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selevan SG, Lindbohm M, Hornung RW, Hemminki K. A study of occupational exposure to antineoplastic drugs and fetal loss in nurses. N Engl J Med. 1985; 313: 1173–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindbohm M, Hemminki K, Kyyronen P. Parental occupational exposure and spontaneous abortions in Finland. Am J Epidemiol. 1984; 120: 370–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson G, Rylander R. Exposure to anaesthetic gases and spontaneousabortion: response bias in a postal questionnaire study. Int J Epidemiol. 1982; 11: 150–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hemminki K, Kyyronen P, Lindbohm M. Spontaneous abortions and malformations in the offspring of nurses exposed to anaestheticgases, cytostafic drugs, and other potential hazards in hos-pitals, based on registered information of outcome. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1985; 39: 141–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauwerys R, Siddons M, Misson CB, et al. Anaesthetic health hazardsamong Belgian nurses and physicians. Int Arch Occup EnvironHealth. 1981; 48: 195–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson G, Jeansson S, Rylander R, Unander M. Pregnancy abnormalitiesamong personnel at a virological laboratory. Am J Ind Med. 1980; 1: 129–37.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrell F. The LOGIST procedure. In: Reinhardt PS (ed). SAS SupplementalLibrary User's Guide. Cary, North Carolina: SAS Insti-tute, 1980: 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Kline J, Stein Z, Susser M. Conception to Birth: Epidemiology of Prenantal Development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins J, Steele L, Crawford J, Hueston W. Risk factors for spontaneousabortion among a cohort of female veterinarians [abstr] . Am J Epidemiol. 1991; 134:722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins III J, Hueston W, Gerken D, Hopkins R, Steele L, Craw-ford J. Disorders of Reproduction among Female Veterinarians. Final Report to CDC/NIOSH. Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for DiseaseControl, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Butler WJ, Kalasinski LA. Statistical analysis of epidemiologic data of pregnancy outcomes. Environ Health Perspect. 1989; 79: 223–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Gladen BC. Spontaneous abortion: the role of heterogeneous risk and selective fertility. Early Hum Devel. 1982; 7: 165–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risch HA, Weiss NS, Clarke EA, Miller AB. Risk factors for spontaneousabortion and its recurrence. Am J Epidemiol. 1988; 128: 420–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitz DA, Whelan EA, Kleckner RC. Effect of parents' occupationalexposures on risk of stillbirth, preterm delivery, and small-for-gestational-age infants. Am J Epidemiol. 1989; 129: 1201–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend JC, Bodner KM, VanPeenen PFD, Olson RD, Cook P.R. Survey of reproductive events of wives of employeed exposed to chlorinated dioxins. Am J Epidemiol. 1982; 115: 695–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steele LL. Occupational exposures and adverse pregnancy outcomesamong a cohort of female veterinarians. Dissertation, Ohio State University, 1992; 236 p.
   Google Scholar
• Hammerslough CR. Estimating the probability of spontaneous -- abortion in the presence of induced abortion and vice versa. Pub-lic Health Rep. 1992; 107: 269–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susser E. Spontaneous abortion and induced abortion: an adjustmentfor the presence of induced abortion when estimating the rate of spontaneous abortion from crosssectionalstudies. Am J Epidemiol. 1983; 117: 305–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen J. Calculating risk ratios for spontaneous abortions: the problem of induced abortions. Int J Epidemiol. 1984; 13: 347–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figh-Talamanca I, Repetto F. Correcting spontaneous abortion rates for the presence of induced abortion. Am J Public Health. 1988; 78: 40–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz HM, Reichling BA. Hazards of radiation exposure for pregnant women. JAMA. 1978; 239: 1907–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan JE. Anesthetic gas hazards. In: Heidelbaugh ND, Mur-nane TG, Rosser WW (eds). Health Hazards in Veterinary Prac-tice. 2nd ed. Schaumburg, Illinois: American Veterinary Medical Association,1989: 66–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hightower D. Radiation hazards. In: Heidelbaugh ND, Murnane TG, Rosser WW (eds). Health Hazards in Veterinary Practice. 2nd ed. Schaumburg, Illinois: American Veterinary Medical Associa-tion, 1989: 72–3.
   Google Scholar
• Moritz SA, Wilkins III, Hueston WD. Evaluation of radiation safety in 29 central Ohio veterinary practices. Am J Public Health. 1989; 79.895–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moritz SA, Hueston WD, Wilkins III. Patterns of ionizing radiationexposure among women veterinarians. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1989; 195: 737–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg PC, Hernberg S. Congenital defects and occupational factors: a comparison of different methodological approaches. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1979; 5: 328–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe M. Advantages of a standard method for research on reproductiveeffects of occupation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1988; 42: 209–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond GG, Bodner KM, Sobel W, Shellenberger RJ, Flores GH. Validation of work histories obtained from interviews. Arn J Epi-demiol. 1988; 128: 343–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskenazi B, Pearson K. Validation of a selfadministeredquestionnaire for assessing occupational and environmental exposuresof pregnant women. Arn J Epidemiol. 1988; 128: 1117–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson G, Rylander R. Validation of questionnaire reported miscarriage, malformation and birth weight. Int J Epidemiol. 1984; 13: 94–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox AJ, Homey LF. Accuracy of spontaneous abortion recall. Asn J Epidemiol. 1984; 120: 727–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline J, Stein Z. Spontaneous abortion (miscarriage). In: Bracken MB (ed). Perinatal Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984: 23–51.
   Google Scholar
• Fenster L, Eskenazi B, Windham GC, Swan SH. Caffeine consumptionduring pregnancy and spontaneous abortion. Epi-demiology. 1991; 2: 168–74.
   Google Scholar
• Furahashi N, Sato S, Suzuki M, Hiruta M, Tanaka M, Takahashi T. Effects of caffeine consumption during pregnancy. Gynecol ObstetInvest. 1985; 19: 187–91.
   Google Scholar
• Srisuphan W, Bracken MB. Caffeine consumption during pregnancyand association with late spontaneous abortion. Am J OhstetGynecol. 1986; 154:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legator MS, Harper BL. Paternal exposure to chemicals and health outcomes in offspring. J Occup Med Toxicol. 1993; 2: 409–20.
   Google Scholar
• Savitz DA, Sonnenfeld NL, Olshan AF. Review of epidemiologic studies of paternal occupational exposure and spontaneous abor-tion. Am J Ind Med. 1994; 25: 361–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu DTY, Melville HAH, Martin T. Subsequent gestational morbidityafter various types of abortion. Lancet. 1972; 2:431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright CSW, Campbell 5, Beazley J. Second-trimester abortion aftervaginal termination of pregnancy. Lancet. 1972; 1: 1278–9.
   Google Scholar
• Daling JR, Emanuell. Induced abortion and subsequent outcome of pregnancy. Lancet. 1975; 2: 170–2.
   Google Scholar
• Harlap S, Shiono PH, Ramcharan S. A life table of spontaneous abortions and the effects of age, parity, and other variables. In: Porter IH, Hook EB (eds). Human Embryonic and Fetal Death. New York: Academic Press, 1980: 145–58.
   Google Scholar
• Kline J, Stein Z, Susser M, Warburton D. Induced abortion and spontaneous abortion: no connection? Am J Epidemiol. 1978; 107: 290–8.
   Google Scholar
• Kline J, Stein Z, Susser M, Warburton D. Induced abortion and the chromosomal characteristics of subsequent miscarriages (spontaneous abortions). Am J Epidemiol. 1986; 123: 1066–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemasters GK, Pinney SM. Employment status as a confounder when assessing occupational exposures and spontaneous abor-tion. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989; 42: 975–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe M. Biases in research on reproduction and women's work. Int J Epidemiol. 1985; 14: 118–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marbury MC, Linn S, Monson R, et al. Work and pregnancy. J OccupMed. 1984; 26: 415–21.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hemminki K, Niemi M, Kyyronen P. Kilpikari I, Vaino H. Spon-taneous abortions and reproductive selection mechanisms in the rubber and leather industry in Finland. Br J Ind Med. 1983; 40: 81–6.
   Google Scholar
• Axelsson G. Selection bias in studies of spontaneous abortion among occupational groups. J Occup Med. 1984; 26: 525–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Selevan SG. Design considerations in pregnancy outcome studies of occupational populations. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1981; 7 (4) 76–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freeman DH. Sample size determination in comparative studies. In: Bracken M (ed). Perinatal Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press, 1984: 357–69.
   Google Scholar