References
- Watterson A. Chemical hazards and public confidence. Lancet. 1993; 342: 131–2.
- Lemen RA (National Institute for Occu-pational Safety and Health). Letter to M Mercier (International Program on Chemical Safety), Oct. 5, 1993.
- Maltoni C (Collegium Ramazzini). Letter to M Mercier, Nov. 2, 1993.
- Conclusions and recommendations of a workshop on multiple chemical sensitivi-ties (MCS). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1996; 24: 8188–S189.
- Abrams H, et al. Letters to the editor. Arch Envir Health 1996; 51: 338–40.
- Claussen EB (US Dept of State). Letter to M Mercier, June 24, 1996.
- Pinnagoda C (ILO-Geneva). Memoran-dum to W Vieira dos Santos (ILO-Brasilia), Apr. 23, 1993.
- Giannasi F, Thebaud-Mony A. Occupa-tional exposures to asbestos in Brazil. Int J Occup Environ Health. 1997; 3: 150–7.
- Takala J (ILO-Geneva). Letter to B Castleman, Oct. 1, 1997.
- Knave B. Personal communication to B Castleman, January 16, 1998.
- Grandjean P. Impartiality in research. Int J Occup Environ Health. 1997; 3: 158–60.
- Knave B. Personal communication to B Castleman, January 28, 1998.
- Greenberg M. Letter to S Koziell (WHO-Copenhagen), Oct. 20, 1997.
- Grandjean P (Odense University). Letter to X Bonnefoy (WHO-Copenhagen), Oct
- Dalton AJP ( Transport -and General Workers Union, UK).I.,Itei to X Bon-nefoy, Oct. 24, 1997. Refeti'to editorial, WHO: where there is no vision, the peo-ple perish. Lancet 1997; 350: 749.
- Canada and France fall out over the risks of asbestos. Nature. 1997; 385: 379.
- Wages RE (Oil, Chemical, and Atomic Workers Intl. Union). Letter to J Takala (ILO), Sept. 10, 1997.