Effects of Industrial Detergents on the Barrier Function of Human Skin

References

• Effendy I, Maibach HI. Surfactants and experimental irritant con-tact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 33: 217–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartorelli P, Aprea C, Bussani R, Novelli MT, Orsi D, Sciarra G. In vitro percutaneous penetration of methyl-parathion from a com-mercial formulation through the human skin. Occup Environ Med. 1997; 54: 524–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tupker RA. The influence of detergent on the human skin. Thesis. University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Treffel P, Gabard B. Vehicle influence on the in vitro skin pene-tration of ultra-violet filters used in sun screen formulations. In: Brain KR, James VJ, Walters KA (eds). Prediction of Percutaneous Penetration. Vol. 4B. Cardiff, Wales: STS Publishing, 1996: 178-81.
   Google Scholar
• Grandjean P. Skin Penetration: Hazardous Chemicals at Work. London, U.K.: Taylor and Francis, 1990
   Google Scholar
• Maibach HI, Feldmann RJ, Milby TH, Serat WF. Regional varia-tion in percutaneous penetration in man. Arch Environ Health. 1971; 23: 208–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhein LD, Simon A, Hill RL, Cagan RH, Mattai J, Maibach HI. Hu-man cutaneous response to a mixed surfactant system: role of so-lution phenomena in controlling surfactant irritation. Dermato-logica. 1990; 180: 18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm KP, Surber C, Maibach HI. Effect of sodium lauryl sulfate-induced skin irrigation on in vivo percutaneous absorp-tion of four drugs. J Invest Dermatol. 1991; 96: 963–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry F, Goffin V, Maibach HI, Pierard GE. Regional differences in stratum corneum reactivity to surfactants. Quantitative assess-ment using the corneosurfametry bioassay. Contact Dermatitis. 1997; 37: 271–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahlberg JE. The effect of anionic, cationic, and nonionic deter-gents on the percutaneous absorption of sodium chromate (5ICr) in the guinea pig. Acta Dermatol Venerol. 1968; 48: 549–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boman A. Factors influencing the percutaneous absorption of or-ganic solvents: an experimental study in the guinea pig. Arbeta och Hdlsa. 1989; 11: 1–51.
   Google Scholar
• Priborsky J, Takayama K, Priborska Z, Muhlbachova E, Nagai T. Influence of detergents on skin barrier properties. Pharmacol Toxicol. 1992; 70: 344–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fullerton A, Broby-Johansen U, Agner T. Sodium lauryl sulphate penetration in an in vitro model using human skin. Contact Der-matitis. 1994; 30: 222–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankild S, Andersen KE, Nielsen GD. Effect of sodium lauryl sul-fate (SLS) on in vitro percutaneous penetration of water, hydro-cortisone and nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 1995; 32: 338–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsey JD, Woollen BH, Auton TR, Scott RC. The predictive ac-curacy of in vitro measurements for the dermal absorption of a lipophilic penetrant (fluazifop-butyl) through rat and human skin. Fundam Appl Toxicol. 1994; 23: 230–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Southwell D, Barry BW, Woodford R. Variations in permeability of human skin within and between species. Int J Pharmacol. 1994; 18: 299–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smit HA, Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Burema J, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP. Variability in transepidermal water loss of the skin: evaluation of a method to assess susceptibility to contact dermatitis in epi-demiological studies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1990; 62: 509–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tupker RA, Pinnagoda J, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP. The influence of repeated exposure to surfactants on the human skin as deter-mined by transepidermal water loss and visual scoring. Contact Dermatitis. 1989; 20: 108–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menne T, Calvin G. Concentration threshold of non-occluded nickel exposure in nickel-sensitive individuals and controls with and without surfactant. Contact Dermatitis. 1993; 29: 180–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindsen M, Bruze M, Christensen OB. The significance of previ-ous allergic contact dermatitis for elicitation of delayed hyper-sensitivity to nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 1997; 37: 101–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allenby CF, Basketter DA. An arm immersion model of compro-mised skin. II. Influence on minimal eliciting patch test concen-trations of nickel. Contact Dermatitis. 1993; 28: 129–33.
   Google Scholar