Exposure and Absorption of Hazardous Materials through the Skin

References

• Vecchia BE. Estimating the dermally ab-sorbed dose from chemical exposure: data analysis, parameter estimation, and sensitivity to parameter uncertainties. MS Thesis, Colorado School of Mines. Golden, CO, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH). TLVs and BEIs: Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents. Cincinnati, OH, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. National Occupa-tional Exposure Survey, 1981-1983. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 88-106. Special Data Analysis, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Grandjean P. Preventing percutaneous absorption of industrial chemicals: the "skin" denotation. Am J hid Med 1988; 14: 97–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scansetti G, Piolatto G, Rubino G. Skin notations in the context of workplace ex-posure standards. Am J Ind Med. 1988; 14: 725–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiserova-Bergerova V, Pierce jT, Droz PO. Dermal absorption potential of in-dustrial chemicals: criteria for skin notation. Am J Ind Med. 1990; 17: 617–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy GL, Brock WJ, Banerjee AK. As-signment of skin notation for threshold limit values of chemicals based on acute dermal toxicity. Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1993; 8: 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• European Center for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals. Strategy for as-signing a "skin notation." Report 31 (Re-vised). Brussels, Belgium, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• de Cock J, Heederick D, Kromhout H, Boleij JSM. Strategy for assigning a "skin notation": a comment. Ann Occup Hyg. 1996; 40: 611–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Center for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals. Special Report No. 15. Examination of a proposed skin notation strategy. Brussels, Belgium, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Bunge AL, Cleek RL, Vecchia BE. A new method of estimating dermal absorption from chemical exposure. 3. Compared with steady-state methods for prediction and data analysis. Pharmaceut Res. 1995; 12: 972–82.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Assessment Guidance for Super-fund. Vol. 1: Human Health Evaluation Manual, Supplemental Guidance, Der-mal Risk Assessment, Interim Guidance. NCEA-W-0364, May 1998, External Re-view Draft.
   Google Scholar
• Fenske R, Van HemmenR. Occupational skin exposure to chemical substances: setting limits. Ann Occup Hyg. 1994; 38: 333–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guest I. The Chemical Industries Associ-ation guidance on allocating occupa-tional exposure bands. Ann Occup Hyg. 1998; 42: 407–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans P. A banding approach to control-ling the risks from dermal exposure. Skin Contacts, newsletter of the Dermal Expo-sure Network, Europe, June issue, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Bos PMJ, Brouwer DH, Stevenson H, Boogaard PJ, de Kort WLAM, van Hem-men 3. Proposal for the assessment of quantitative dermal exposure limits in occupational environments: Part 1. De-velopment of a concept of derive a quan-tiative dermal occupational exposure limit. Occup Environ Med. 1998; 55: 705–804.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer DH, Hoogendoom L, Bos PMJ, Boogaard PJ, van Hemmen D. Proposal for the assessment of quantitative dermal exposure limits in occupational environ-ments: Part 2. Feasibility of study for ap-plication in an exposure scenario for MDA by two different dermal exposure sampling methods. Occup Environ Med. 1988; 55: 805–11.
   Google Scholar
• Packham CL. Setting limits on occupa-tional skin exposure to chemical sub-stances (letter to the editor). Ann Occup Hyg. 1995; 39: 125–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker JD, Whittaker C, McDougal JN. Role of the TSCA interagency testing committee in meeting the U.S. govern-ment data needs: designating chemicals for percutaneous absorption rate testing. In: Marzulli FN, Maibach HI (ed). Der-matotoxicology. 5th ed. Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis, 1996: 371-81.
   Google Scholar