Children's Environmental Health: A Case Study in Implementing the Precautionary Principle

References

• Raffensperger C, Tickner J (eds). Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Washing-ton, DC: Island Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. Pesticides in the Diets of Infants and Children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Landrigan, P, Suk W, and Amler R. Chemical wastes, children's health, and the Superfund Basic Research Program. Environ Health Perspect. 1999; 107: 423–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wargo J. Our Children's Toxic Legacy: How Science and Law Fail to Protect Us from Pesticides. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Landrigan P. Risk assessment for children and other sensitive popu-lations. In: Bailar J (ed). Uncertainty in the risk assessment of envi-ronmental and occupational hazards. Ann NY AcadSci. 1999: 895.
   Google Scholar
• Children's Environmental Health Network. Resource Guide on Chil-dren's Environmental Health. San Francisco, CA: CEHN, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Schettler T, Solomon G, Valenti M, and Huddle A. Generations at Risk: Reproductive Health and the Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Schettler T, Stein J, Reich F, Valenti M. In Harm's Way: Toxic Threats to Child Development. Boston, MA: Greater Boston Physi-cians for Social Responsibility, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• May M. Disturbing behavior: neurotoxic effects on children. Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108: 262–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Consumer Product Safety Commission. The Risk of Chronic Toxicity Associated with Exposure to Diisononyl Phthalate (DINP) in Children's Products. USCPSC, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner J. A map toward precautionary decision-making. In: Raf-fensperger, C, Ticicner J (eds). Protecting Public Health and the Envi-ronment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999: 162-186.
   Google Scholar
• Colborn T., Dumanoski D, Myers JP. Our Stolen Future. New York: Dutton Books, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hubal E, Sheldon L, Burke J et al. Children's exposure assessment: a review of factors influencing children's exposure, and the data available to characterize and assess that exposure. Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108: 475–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Chemical Hazard Data Availability Study: What Do We Really Know about the Safety of High Production Volume Chemicals. Office of Pollution Preven-tion and Toxics, USEPA, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Kitman J. The secret history of lead. The Nation. 2000, March 20: 11–43.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz G, Rosner D. Cater to the children: the role of the lead industry in a public health tragedy, 1900-1955. Am J Public Health. 2000; 90: 36–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wynne B. Uncertainty and environmental learning. In: Jackson T. Clean Production Strategies. Boca Raton: Lewis Publishers, 1993: 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Landrigan P, Claudio L, Markowitz S et al. Pesticides and inner-city children: exposures, risks, and prevention. Environ Health Perspect. 1999;107, suppl 3: 431-7.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Asthma and upper respiratory illnesses. Office of Childrens Health Protection, USEPA, 2000. Available at http:www.epa.govichildren/asthma.htm.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Childhood Cancer. Office of Childrens Health Protection, USEPA, 2000. Available at http:www.epa.gov/children/cancer.htm.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. Our History. Office of Children's Health Protection, USEPA, 2000. Available at http:www.epa.govichildren/whoweihistory.htm.
   Google Scholar
• The White House. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks, April 21,1997.
   Google Scholar
• United States Environmental Protection Agency. President's Task-force on Environmental Health and Safety Risks to Children. Office of Childrens Health Protection, USEPA, 2000. Available at http:www.epa.gov/children/whatwe/fedtask.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Seerdorff L. Head of Division, Danish Environmental Protection Agency. Personal interview, May 21, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien M. Making Better Environmental Decisions: An Alternative' to Risk Assessment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett K, Raffensperger C. Precautionary science. In: Raffensperger C, Tickler J (eds). Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999: 106-22.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorino D. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Issues in Science and Technology. 1990; 15: 226–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renn O, Webler T, Wiedermann P. Fairness and Competence in Cit-izen Participation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: IKlewer Academic, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson T (ed). Clean Production Strategies. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis Publishers, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Geiser K. Cleaner production and the precautionary principle. In: Raffensperger C, Tickner J (eds). Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Washing-ton, DC: Island Press, 1999: 323-36.
   Google Scholar
• Wahlstrom B. . The precautionary approach to chemicals manage-ment: a Swedish perspective. In: Raffensperger C, Tickner y eds). Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1999: 51-70.
   Google Scholar
• Toidcs Use Reduction Institute. Massachusetts Is Cleaner and Safer. Lowell, MA: TURI. 1997
   Google Scholar
• Dreborg K. Essence of backcasting. Futures. 1996; 28: 813–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Parliament. Swedish Environmental Quality Objectives. Government Bill 1997/98:145, passed as 1998/99:MJU6,1999.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Committee on New Guidelines on Chemicals Policy. Sum-mary of the report of the Swedish Committee on New Guidelines on Chemical Policy. From, Non-Hazardous Products: Proposals for Implementation of New Guidelines on Chemicals Policy. Statens Offentliga Utredningar-SOU 2000:53.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Ministry of Environment, Swedish Environmental Protec-tion Agency, Swedish National Chemicals Inspectorate. Chemicals with Certain Properties Should be Automatically Banned. Swedish Environment. 1998; 2: 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Environment and Energy. A Strategy for Intensi-fied Efforts in the Field of Chemicals-in Demark, in the EU, and Globally. Copenhagen, Denmark, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Danish Ministry of Environment and Energy. The Consequences of Reducing the Use of Pesticides Have Now Been Dlucidated. Faktuelt 21. Copenhagen, Denmark, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• van Dunne J (ed). Environmental Contracts and Covenants: New Instruments for a Realistic Environmental Policy? Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Vermanda Lelystad, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Montague P. Preferring the least harmful way. Rachel's Environment and Health Weekly. 2000, January 27:684.
   Google Scholar
• Benbrook C, Groth E, Halloran J, Hansen M, Marquardt S. Pest Management at the Crossroads. Yorkers, NY: Consumers Union, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Olden K, Guthrie J. Children's health: a mixed review. Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108: A250–A251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boehmer-Christiansen S. The precautionary principle in Germany-enabling government. In: O'Riordan T, Cameron J (eds). Interpret-ing the Precautionary Principle. London, U.K: Earthscan, 1994: 31-61.
   Google Scholar