134
Views
41
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Breast Cancer Risk in Hispanic Agricultural Workers in California

Pages 123-131 | Published online: 19 Jul 2013

References

  • United States Bureau of the Census, 1990. General Population Characteristics. California. 1990 CP-1-6. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, Bureau of the Census.
  • Kwong S, Perkins C, Morris C, et al. Cancer in California 1988-1998, Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Ser-vices, Cancer Surveillance Section, December 2000.
  • Kelsey J, Bernstein L. Epidemiology and prevention of breast cancer. Annu Rev Public Health. 1996; 17: 47–67.
  • State of California, Department of Health Services. Birth Records. Sacramento, CA, 1998.
  • Laden F, Hunter DJ. Environmental risk factors and female breast cancer. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998; 19: 101–23.
  • O'Leary ES, Vena JE, Freudenheim JL, Brasure J. Pesticide exposure and risk of breast cancer; a nested case-control study of residentially stable women living on Long Island, Environ Res. 2004; 4: 134–44.
  • Band PR, Le ND, Fang R, Deschamps M, Gallagher RP, Yang P. Identification of occupational cancer risks in British Columbia. A population-based case--cöntrol study of 995 incident breast cancer cases by menopausal status, controlling for confounding factors. J Occup Environ Med. 2000; 42: 284–310.
  • Kocic B, Jankovic S, Petrovic B, Tiodorvic B. Some insufficiently recognized risk factors for breast cancer. Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1996; 124: 175–8.
  • Petxalia SA, Chow WIL McLaughlin JK, Jin F, Gao YT, Dosemeci M. Occupational risk factors for breast cancer among women in Shanghai. Am J Ind Med. 1998; 34: 477–83.
  • Brophy JT, Keith MM, Gorey KM, et al. Occupational histories of cancer patients in a Canadian cancer treatment center and the generating hypothesis regarding breast cancer and farming. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2002; 8: 346–53.
  • Blair A, Dosemeci M, Heineman E. Cancer and other causes of death among male and female farmers from twenty-three states. Am J Ind Med. 1993; 23: 729–42.
  • Wicklund K, Dich J. Cancer risks among female farmers in Sweden. Cancer Causes and Control. 1994; 5: 449–57.
  • Settiini, L, Comba P, Carried i P, et al. Cancer risk among female agricultural workers: a multi-center case-control study. Am J Ind Med. 1999; 36: 13541.
  • Wang Y, Lewis-Michl EL, Fitzgerald E, Stark A. Cancer incidence among a cohort of female farm residents in New York State. Arch Environ Health. 2002; 57: 561–7.
  • National Center for Environmental Health, Division of Labora-tory Sciences. NCEH Pub. No. 02-0716. Atlanta, GA, 2003.
  • Morris CM, Cohen R, Perkins CI, et al. Cancer in California 1988-1996. Sacramento, CA, California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, March 1999.
  • California Cancer Reporting System Standards. Volume One: abstracting and coding procedures for hospitals, fifth edition. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Health Services, California Cancer Registry, Data Standards and Assessment Unit, 1988.
  • Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Sum-mary Staging Guide for the Cancer Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Reporting (SEER) Program. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, 1977; reprinted 1986.
  • Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. SEER Extent of Disease-1988 Coding Instructions, second edition. NIH Pub. No. 92-2313. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute, 1992.
  • Jaro MA. Probabilistic record linkages of large public health databases. Stat Med. 1995; 14: 491–8.
  • California Department of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento, CA, 2001. Available at http://www.cpr.cagov/docs/pur/pur98rep/tables04.htm.
  • Hall B, Richards F. Health Data Summary for California Coun-ties. 1994 Report. Department of Health Services. State of Cali-fornia, Sacramento, CA, September 1994.
  • Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Nat Cancer Inst. 1959; 22: 719–48.
  • Breslow N, Day N. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research, Vol. 1. The analysis of case control studies. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyons, France, 1980.
  • Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), Version 11.0. Chicago, IL, 2001.
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Chemicals Evaluated for Carcinogenic Potential. Science Information Branch, Health Effects Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, 2001.
  • Hoar SK, Blair A, Holmes-FE, et al. Agricultural herbicides use and risk Of lymphoma and soft-tissue sarcoma. JAMA. 1986; 256: 1141–7.
  • Cantor KP, Blair A, Everett G, et al. Pesticides and other agri-cultural risk factors for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma among men in Iowa and Minnesota. Cancer Res. 1992; 52: 2447–55.
  • Gallo MA, Lawryk NJ. Organic phosphorous pesticides. In: Hayes WJ Jr, Laws ER Jr (eds). Handbook of Pesticide Toxicol-ogy. New York: Academic Press, 1991.
  • U.S. Public Health Service. Hazardous Substance Data Bank. Washington, DC, 1995.
  • Hernandez B, Spencer J, Schneider F, Welsh A, Fredrickson S. A Summary of Dislodgeable Foliar Pesticide Residues at Expira-tion of the Restricted Entry Interval, 1997-2001. California - Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento, CA, 2002.
  • Mills PK, Kwong S. Cancer incidence in the United Farm Work-ers of America (UFW), 1987-1997. Am J Ind Med. 2001; 40: 596–603.
  • Krukl, Aboul-Enein HY. Occupational physical activity and the risk of breast cancer. Cancer Detect Prey. 2003; 27: 187–92.
  • Yost K, Perkins C, Cohen R, Morris C, Wright W. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control. 2001; 12: 703–11.
  • Liu L, Deapen D, Bernstein L. Socioeconomic status and can-cers of the female breast and reproductive organs: a comparison across racial/ethnic populations in Los Angeles County, Cali-fornia (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 1998; 9: 369–80.
  • Villarejo D, Lighthall D, Bade B, Samuels S. Access to Health Care for California's Hired Farm Workers: A Baseline Report. California Program on Access to Care, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 2001.
  • Perkins C, Cohen R, Young JL, Schlag R, Wright W. Cancer in California: Detailed Site and Histology, 1990-1994. California Department of Health Services, Cancer Surveillance Section, Sacramento, CA, December 1997.
  • American Cancer Society, California Division and Public Health Institute, California Cancer Registry. California Facts and Fig-ures, 2002. American Cancer Society, California Division, Oak-land, CA, September 2001.
  • Gilliland F, Hunt WC, Baumgartner KB, et al. Reproductive risk factors for breast cancer in Hispanic and non-Hispanic white women. Am J Epidemiol. 1998; 148: 683–92.
  • Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Ecologic studies. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippin-cott-Raven, 1998.
  • Mills PK, Yang R. Prostate cancer risk in California farm work-ers. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45;249–58.
  • Alavanja M, Samanic C, Dosemeci M, et al. Use of agricultural pesticides and prostate cancer risk in the Agricultural Health Study Cohort. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157: 800–14.
  • Gammon MD, Wolff MS, Neugat AI, et al. Environmental toxins and breast cancer on Long Island. II. Organochlorine compound levels in blood. Cancer Epidemiol Biol Prey. 20021: 686-97.
  • Kristensen P, Andersen A, Irgens LM. Hormone-dependent cancer and adverse reproductive outcomes in farmers' fami- - lies-effects of climatic conditions favoring fungal growth in grain. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2000; 26: 33127.
  • Reeves M, Schafer KS. Greater risks, fewer rights: U.S. farm-workers and pesticides. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2003; 9: 30–9.
  • Duell EJ, Millikan RC, Savitz DA, et al. A population-based case-control study of farming and breast cancer in North Car-olina. Epidemiology. 2000; 11: 523–31.
  • Savitz D, Olshan A. Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol. 1995; 142: 904–8.
  • Rothman K. No adjustments are needed for multiple compar-isons. Epidemiology. 1990; 1: 43–6.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.