REFERENCES
- Contaminated Land. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology, London, England, 1993.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Updating Remedy Decisions at Select Superfund Sites. Biannual Summary Report FY2000 and FY2001. USEPA 2003. EPA-540-R-03-001, OSWER #9355.0-94.
- DETR., Planning for Communities of, the Future, DETR Febru-ary 1998. Cm 3885.
- DETR. Contaminated Land: Implementation of Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. DETR Circular 2/2000
- HolOre G. The new contaminated land regime: Part IIA of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. Land Contain Reclam. 2000; 8: 117–32.
- Hough RL, Breward N, Young SD, et al. Assessing potential risk of heavy metal exposure from consumption of home-produced vegetables by urban populations. Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 112: 215–21.
- Bardos P. A review of the Contaminated Land Rehabilitation Network for Environmental Technologies in Europe (CLAR-INET). Part 2: Working Group findings. Land Contain Reclam. 2003; 11: 15–30.
- Jewell T, Steele J, UK regulatory reform and the pursuit of ‘sus-tainable development’: The Environment Act 1995. J Environ Law. 1996; 8: 283–300.
- Brookes T, Cox R. Strategey for the Investigation and Remedia-non of Contaminated Land, Environmental Protection Act, Part ITA, Report No. CLSTRAT REV. 4 (final. Teignbridge District Council, Devon, UK, 2001.
- Stephens C, Hough RI, Busby A, Edwards D. Assessing the health risk and impact associated with living on the Thames View Estate: a rapid literature review of methods. 2004. http://www.ishtm.ac.uk/pehru/communities/tharnesview.pdf.
- Barking & Havering Local Health Community. Barking and Dagenham Primary Care Trust-Annual Report 2003-2004 http://www.barkinghaveringhealth.nhs.uk/pubs_arepbsed2004.htm.
- Renwick AG. The use of safety or uncertainty factors in the set-ting of acute reference doses. Food Addit Contarn. 20008: 135-50.
- Teuschler LK, Dourson ML, Stiteler WM, McClure P, Tully H. Health risk above the reference dose for multiple chemicals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 1999; 30: S19–S26.
- c Sullivan J, Diamond PD, Kaplan CL, Mader Tj, Santa P., Lloyd RS. Community outreach as an iterative dialogue among scientists and communities in the Texas Gulf Coast region, Mutat Res-Rev Mutat. 2003;544;331-8.
- Foundation for Water Research, Literature Review on Risk Per-ception and Communication for Contaminated Land, Report No. SR 97(02)F, Foundation for Water Research, Marlow, UK, 1997
- Drijver M. Local Environmental Health Concerns, The Hague: Health Council of The Netherlands, 2002.
- Bennett P. Communicating about risks to public health. Point-ers to good practice, HMSO. 1998. oiww.doh.gov/pointers. htm>.
- Wylie J, Ouboter S. Reijerkerk L, Schelwald L, Weenk A, Weter-ings R. Risk communication for contaminated land: Developing guidelines from practical observations and case studies. Land Contain Reclam. 2001; 9: 164–9.
- Kidd M. Determinations rise for contaminated land Environ-mental Health News, August 11,2005. http://www.ehn-online.com/cgi-bin/news/newsfocus6/eekfzvafkpcifygeoza,html.
- Thames View Estate Residents Meeting on 28th January 2005: Summary Record of Meeting. http://www.barking-dagenhatn,gov,uk/6-living/envir-protect/pdf/thames-view-estate3.pdf.
- Sjöberg L. Local acceptance of a high-level nuclear waste repos-itory. Risk Atia1. 2004; 24: 737–49.