Excessive and Disproportionate Advertising in Peer-reviewed Journals

REFERENCES

• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Jour-nals. http://www.icmje.org/. Last updated October 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Avorn J, Chen M, Hartley R. Scientific versus commercial sources of influence on the prescribing behavior of physicians. Am J Med. 1982; 73: 4–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemminki E. Review of the literature on the factors affecting drug prescribing. Soc Sci Med. 1975; 9; 111–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler DA. Addressing the problem of misleading advertising. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 116: 950–1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns R, Moskowitz M, Osband M, Kazis L. Newspaper report-ing of the medical literature. J Gen Intern Med, 1995; 10: 19–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips D, Kanter E, Bednarczyk B, Tastad P. Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scien-tific community. N Eng1J Med, 1991; 325: 1180–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber E. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of pub-lished studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA, 2002; 287: 2847–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BPA International Journal Circulation Audit, June 2001. http://www.bpai.corn/. Accessed June 12, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• ISI Journal Citation Report, 2000. http://www.isinet.com/isi/. Accessed February 2004.
   Google Scholar
• New England Journal of Medicine. 2001; 344-345: 1-1978 and 1-1882.
   Google Scholar
• Journal of the American Medical Association. 2001; 285-286: 1-3129 and 1-3119.
   Google Scholar
• Consolidated Financial Statement, Annual Report. Year Ending December 31, 2001, pp.26-34. American Medical Association, Auditors: Deloitte and Touche LLP.
   Google Scholar
• Journal of the American Medical Association. 2002 Rate Card. Number 56 / Effective January 1, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• PERQ/HCI Journal Ad Review. Top 15 Multispecialty Journals by Advertising Revenue 2001 Data. http://www.perq-hci.com/news/spending/multispecialtylitml.
   Google Scholar
• New England Journal of Medicine online media kit. http://contentnejrn.org. Accessed June 12, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Revenue Per Advertising Dollar Expenditure: by most adver-tised segment. Ad Age. http:www.adage.com/page.cms?pageid=918. Accessed September 24, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Glassman PA, Hunter-Hayes J, Nakamura T. Pharmaceutical advertising revenue and physician organizations: how much is too much. West J Med. 1999; 171:234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magazine Publishers of America (MPA). 2003 Report: Editorial Trends and Magazine Handbook. http://www.magazine.org/editorial/editorial_trends_and_magazine_handbook/1106.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Time Media Kit. http://www.time-planner.com/planner/research/index.htrnl. Last accessed November 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Jones M, Greenfield S, Bradley C. A survey of the advertising of nine new drugs in the general practice literature. J Clin Phar-macol Then 1999; 24: 451–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson CP, Bloom DA. Sales and science: changing patterns of pharmaceutical and medical device advertising in peer reviewed, urology publications, 1975-2000. J Urol. 2001; 166: 2317-20.
   Google Scholar
• Altman LK. Inside medical journals, a rising quest for profits. New York Times. August 24, 1999, Tuesday, Late Edition.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe S. Drug advertising that go straight to the hippocampus. Lancet. 1996; 348:632.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes MS, Dobai BH, Shapiro MF. Pharmaceutical advertise-ments in leading medical journals: expert's assessments. Ann Intern Med. 1992; 116: 912–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell PJ. Let the buyer (and reader) beware!: targeted advertising in medical journals. Arch Ophthalrnol. 1999; 117: 1077.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith R. Another editor bites the dust. BMJ 1999; 319: 272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman LS, Richter ED. Conflict of interest and scientific Integrity. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2005; 11: 205–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis RM, Mullner M. Editorial independence at medical jour-nals owned by professional associations: a survey of editors. Sci Eng Ethics. 2002, 8; 513–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedantam S. Business, science clash at medical journal. Washin-ton Post. February 7, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Med journals ‘too close to firms.’ BBC World Edition. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/hea1th/4552509.stm. Accessed May 17, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman LS, Richter ED. Relationship between conflicts of interest and research results. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19; 51–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar