Organizational Characteristics of Small Metal-Fabricating Businessesin Minnesota

References

• NIOSH. Identifying high-risk small business industries-1999. Accessed February 24, 2006. !http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/sbintro.html.
   Google Scholar
• United States Small Business Administration. Characteristics of small business employees and owners- 1997. Accessed October 27, 2005. http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/sbfaq.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols T, Dennis A, Guy W. Size of employment unit and injury rates in British manufacturing: a secondary analysis of WS 1990 data. Ind Rel. 1997; 26: 45–56.
   Google Scholar
• McVitte D, Banikin H, Brocklebank W. The effects of firm size on injury frequency in construction. Saf Sci. 1997; 27: 19–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oleinick A, Gluck J, Guire K. Establishment size and risk of occupational injury. Ain J Ind Med. 1995; 28: 1–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayhew C, Quinlan M. The effects of outsourcing on occupa-tional health and safety; a comparative study of factory-based workers and outworkers in the Australian clothing industry. Int J Health Serv. 1999; 29: 83–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters DR. Employee representation and health and safety: a strategy for improving health and safety performance in small enterprises? Employ Rev. 1998; 20: 180–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe P, Kitay J. Small business and employment relations. Labor and Industry. 1988; 1: 516–50.
   Google Scholar
• Barbeau E, Roelofs C, Yougnstrom R, Sorenson G, Stoddard A, LaMontagne AD. Assessment of occupational safety and health programs in small businesses. Am J Ind Med. 2004; 45: 371–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leviton LC, Sheehy JW. Ecouraging small businesses to adopt effective technologies to prevent exposure hazards. Am J Ind Med. 1995; 29: 409–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick K, Walters D. Worker representation on health and safety in small enterprises: lessons from a Swedish approach. Int Lab Rev. 1998; 137: 367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen D, Sieber W National occupational exposure survey: analysis of management interview responses. DHHS (NIOSH). DHHS (NIOSH). Publication No. 89-103. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Ser-vice-1988. Accessed August 26, 2005. http:www.cdc.gov/external/niosh/89-103.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stokols D, McMahan S, Clitheroe HC, Wells, M. Enhancing cor-porate compliance with worksite safety and health legislation. J Sal Res. 2001; 32: 441–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champoux D, Brun JP. Occupational health and safety man-agement in small size enterprises: an overview of the situation and avenues for intervention. Sal Sci. 2003; 41: 301–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin JM., Weir N. Canadian approaches to the promotion of health in small workplaces. Can J Public Health. 1995; 86: 109–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eakin JM, MacEachen E. Health and the social relations of work: a study of the health-related experiences of employees in small workplaces. Sociol Health Illness. 1998; 20: 896–914.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakin JM. Leaving it up to the workers: sociological perspective of the management of health and safety in small workplaces. Int J Health Serv. 1992; 22: 689–704.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reference USA. Reference USA: An Info USA Service. 2006. Accessed August 26, 2005. http:www.referenceusa.com
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota Workers Compensation Insurers Association. 2006. Accessed February 16, 2006. http://www.mwcia.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Munshi K, Parker DP, Samant Y, Brosseau LB, Pan W, Xi M. Machine safety evaluation in small metal working facilities: an evaluation of inter-rater reliability in the quantification of machine-related hazards. Am J Ind Med. 2005; 48: 381–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSHA. Machine Guarding Checklist. 2004a; Assessed February 24, 2006. http://www.osha.gov/publications/mach_safeguard/checklist.html
   Google Scholar
• OR-OSHA. Oregon OSHA safety checklist. 2004; Assessed February 24, 2006. http://www.cbs.state.or.us/external/osha/pdf/sharp/sharpchecklist.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brubaker S. Optimum machine guarding. Occup Health Sal. 1997; 66: 3740.
   Google Scholar
• Ellenbecker MJ.Engineering controls as an intervention to reduce worker exposure. Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29: 303–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samant Y, Parker D, Brosseau L., et al Profile of machine safety in small metal fabrication businesses. Am J Ind Med. 2006; 49: 352–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OSHA. Form 33. 2004b. Assesseded February 24, 2006. http://www.osha.gov/oshdoc/directive_pdf/csp2_2004-06_ch-4_exhibitl.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Minnesota OSHA. A Workplace Accident and Injury Reduction Program (AWAIR). 2003. Assessed August 26, 2005. http://www.doli.state.mn.us/pdf/awair.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OSHA. Record keeping form. 2004c. Assessed February 24, 2006. http://www.osha.gov/recordkeeping/new-osha300form1-1-04.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• SAS. The SAS System. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon HS, Walters V, Lewchuck W., et al Workplace organi-zational correlates of lost-time accident rates in manufacturing. Am J Ind Med. 1996; 29: 258–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boden LI, Hall JA, Levenstein C, Punnett L. The impact of health and safety committees. A study based on survey, inter-view, and Occupational Safety and Health Administration data. J Occup Med. 1984; 26: 829–834.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor GS. A reanalysis of the relation between unionization and workplace safety. Int J Health Serv. 1987; 17: 443–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman CD, Cord B, Donovan RJ, Jalleh G. Association of the health-promoting workplace with trade unionism and other industrial factors. Am J Health Promot. 1998; 12: 325–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson MG, DeJoy DM, Jorgensen CM, Crump CJ. Health pro-motion programs in small worksites: results of a national survey. Am J Health Promot. 1999; 13: 358–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahan, Wells S, Stokols M, Kimari D, Clitheroe HG. Assess-ing health promotion programming in small businesses. 2003. Assessed August 26, 2005. !http://ajhs.tamu.edu/17-3/mcma-han.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Harms-Ringdahl L, Jansson T. Safety, health and environment in small process plants-results from a European survey. J Safety Res. 2000;3171–80.
   Google Scholar
• OSHA. Differences between federal OSHA and Minnesota OSHA. Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry. 2006. Assessed October 25, 2006. http://www.doli.state.mn.us/differ.html.
   Google Scholar