References
- Bühler, C. (2000) Empowered Participation of Users with Disabilities in Projects. FORTUNE Guide. Commission of the European Communities. FTB. Germany.
- Cooms, N. (1991) Disability and Technology: a Historical and Social Perspective. Paper given at the Organization of American Historians in Washington, DC.
- Cook, A.M., Hussey, S. (2000) Assistive technologies: principles and practice. Mosby. USA.
- Edyburn, D.L. (2002) Models, theories, and frameworks: Contributions to understanding special education technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 4(2), 16–24.
- EUSTAT (1999) Assistive Technology Educationfor end users. Guidelines for trainers. European Commission. Siva, Italy.
- Ezzy, D. (2002) Qualitative Analysis. Practice and innovation. London: Routledge.
- Hocking, C. (1999) Function or feelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices. Technology and Disability, 11, 3–11.
- Jonasen, V. (1998) Dansk Socialpolitik 1708–1998. Den Sociale H0jskole Ârhus.
- Kronlof, G.H., Sonn, U. (1999) Elderly women’s ways of relating to assistive devices. Technology and Disability, 10(3), 161–168.
- Lawton, M.P., Nahemow, L. (1973 ) Toward an ecological theory of adaptation and aging. In: Environmental design research. Preisler, ed. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, 24–32.
- Pape, T.L., et al (2002) The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disability and Rehabilitation, 24(1/3), 5–20.
- Pippin, K., Fernie, G.R. (1997) Designing devices that are acceptable to the frail elderly: a new understanding based upon how older people perceive a walker. Disability, 7(1/2), 93–102.
- Scherer, M.J. (1993) Living in the state of stuck. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
- Townsend, E. (Ed.) (1999) Enabling Occupation. An occupational theray perspective. Ottawa: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists.
- WHO ICF (2001) International Classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO.