The Bobath concept: a critical review of the theoretical assumptions that guide physiotherapy practice in stroke rehabilitation

References

• Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW & Bateman A. Stroke: issues in recovery and rehabilitation. Physiotherapy 1995; 81: 689–94
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Stroke rehabilitation. Effective Healthcare Bull 1992;2: 1–11
   Google Scholar
• Jackson J. Approaches to neurological rehabilitation by physiotherapists. Br J Ther Rehabil 1994; 1: 71–4
   Google Scholar
• Ashbum A, Partridge C & De Souza L. Physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of stroke: a review. Clin Rehabil 1993; 7: 337–45
   Google Scholar
• Bobath B. Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and Treatment, 3rd edn. Oxford: Heinemann, 1990
   Google Scholar
• Gordon J. Assumptions underlying physical therapy intervention: theoretical and historical perspectives. In: Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Gordon J, Gentile AM & Held JM (eds) Movement Science Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation. London: Heinemann, 1987: 1–30
   Google Scholar
• Ostrosky KM. Facilitation versus motor control. Clin Mgmt 1990; 10: 34–40
   Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V & Bass Haugen J. Motor behaviour research implications for therapeutic approaches to central nervous system dysfunction. Am J Occup Ther 1994; 48: 733–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stachura K. Professional dilemmas facing physiotherapists. Physiotherapy 1994; 80: 357–60
   Google Scholar
• Nativ A. Kinesiological issues in motor training following brain trauma. Crit Rev Phys Rehabil Med 1993; 5: 227–46
   Google Scholar
• Valvano J & Long T. Neurodevelopmental treatment: a review of the writings of the Bobaths. Paediatr Phys Ther 1991; 3: 125–9
   Google Scholar
• Mayston M. The Bobath concept: evolution and application. In: Forssberg H & Hirshfeld H (eds) Movement Disorders in Children. Medicine in Sport and Science. Basel: Karger, 1992; 36: 1-6
   Google Scholar
• Bobath K & Bobath B. The neurodevelopmental concept. In: Scrutton D (ed.) Management of the motor disorders of children with CP. Clinics in Developmental Medicine. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott, 1984;90: 7–12
   Google Scholar
• Lynch M & Grisogono V. Strokes and Head Injuries: A Guide for Patients, Families and Carers. London: John Murray, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Davies PM. Steps to Follow. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1985
   Google Scholar
• Edwards S. The incomplete spinal lesion. In: Bromley I (ed.) Tetraplegia and Paraplegia: A Guide for Physiotherapists. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1991: 145–66
   Google Scholar
• Semans S. The Bobath concept in the treatment of neurological disorders. Am J Phys Med 1966; 46:732–88
   Google Scholar
• Sodring KM. The Bobath concept in the treatment of adult hemiplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 1980:101–5
   Google Scholar
• Keshner E. Re-evaluating the theoretical model underlying the neurodevelopmental theory: a literature review. Phys Ther 1981; 61: 1035–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohman I. The Bobath approach and the geriatric stroke patient. Clin Phys Ther 1987; 14: 183–95
   Google Scholar
• Bly L. A historical and current view of the basis of neurodevelopmental treatment. Paediatr Phys Ther 1991; 3: 131–5
   Google Scholar
• Goodgold-Edwards SA. Principles for guiding action during motor learning: a critical evaluation of neurodevelopmental treatment. Phys Ther Pract 1993; 2: 30–9
   Google Scholar
• Kidd G, Lawes N & Musa I. Understanding neuromuscular plasticity. London: Edward Arnold, 1992: 57-68
   Google Scholar
• Attermeier S. Should the normal motor developmental sequence be used as a theoretical model in patient treatment? In: Proc 11 STEP Conf on Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems. Alexandria: Foundation for Physical Therapy, 1991: 85–7
   Google Scholar
• Ryerson SD. The foot in hemiplegia. In: Hunt GC & McPoil TG (eds) Physical Therapy of the Foot and Ankle, 2nd edn. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1995:135–57
   Google Scholar
• Lee RG & Van Donkelaar P. Mechanisms underlying functional recovery following stroke. Can J Neurol Sei 1995; 22: 257–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr JH, Shepherd RB & Ada L. Spasticity: research findings and implications for intervention. Physiotherapy 1995; 81: 421–9
   Google Scholar
• Carey Jr & Burghardt TP. Movement dysfunction following CNS lesions: a problem of neurologic and muscular impairment. Phys Ther 1993; 73: 538–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz V. Spasticity: exaggerated reflexes or movement disorders. In: Forssberg H & Hirshfeld H (eds) Movement Disorders in Children. Medicine in Sport and Science. Basel: Karger, 1992; 36: 225-33
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt RA. Motor learning principles for physical therapy. In: Proc 11 STEP Conf on Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems. Alexandria: Foundation for Physical Therapy 1991: 49–63
   Google Scholar
• Massion J. Movement, posture and equilibrium: interaction and coordination. Prog Neurobiol 1992; 38: 35–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz V. Human neuronal control of automatic functional movements: interaction between central programmes and afferent input. Physiol Rev 1992; 72: 33–69
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalley-Hammell K. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation. London: Chapman and Hall, 1995;45:1–32
   Google Scholar
• Foster A & Young J. Stroke rehabilitation: can we do better? Br Med J 1992; 305: 1446–7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shumway-Cook A & Woollacott M. Motor control: theory and applications. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1995: 3-21
   Google Scholar
• Horak FB. Assumptions underlying motor control for neurologic rehabilitation. In: Proc 11 STEP Conf on Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems. Virginia: Foundation for Physical Therapy, 1991:11–27
   Google Scholar
• Shepard K. Theory: criteria, importance and impact. In: Proc 11 STEP Conf on Contemporary Management of Motor Control Problems. Virginia: Foundation for Physical Therapy, 1991: 5–10
   Google Scholar