Can conventional therapeutic ultrasound units be used to accelerate fracture repair?

References

• Robertson VJ, Spurritt D. Electrophysical agents: implications of their availability and use in undergraduate clinical placements. Physiotherapy 1998; 84: 335–344
   Google Scholar
• Pope GD, Mockett SP, Wright JP. A survey of electrotherapeutic modalities: ownership and use in the NHS in England. Physiotherapy 1995; 81: 82–91
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay DM, Dearness J, McGinley CC. Electrotherapy usage trends in private physiotherapy practice in Alberta. Physiother Can 1995; 47: 30–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindsay D, Dearness J, Richardson C, et al. A survey of electromodality usage in private physiotherapy practices. Aust J Physiother 1990; 36: 249–256
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson AJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Clinical application of electrotherapeutic modalities. Phys Ther 1988; 68: 1235–1238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Haar G, Dyson M, Oakley S. Ultrasound in physiotherapy in the United Kingdom: results of a questionnaire. Physiother Pract 1988;4: 69–72
   Google Scholar
• ter Haar G, Dyson M, Oakley EM. The use of ultrasound by physiotherapists in Britain, 1985. Ultrasound Med Biol 1987;13: 659–663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal PS, Sobti VK, Roy KS. Histomorpho-chemical studies on the effects of ultrasonic therapy on the healing of experimental muscular injury in dogs. Indian J Animal Sci 1991; 61: 600–601
   Google Scholar
• Hasson S, Mundorf R, Barnes W, et al. Effect of pulsed ultrasound versus placebo on muscle soreness perception and muscular performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1990; 22: 199–205
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gum SL, Reddy GK, Stehno-Bittel L, et al. Combined ultrasound, electrical stimulation, and laser promote collagen synthesis with moderate changes in tendon biomechanics. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 76: 288–296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson BA, Schwane JA, Starcher BC. Effect of ultrasound therapy on the repair of Achilles tendon injuries in rats. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 171–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enwemeka CS, Rodriguez O, Mendosa S. The biomechanical effects of low-intensity ultrasound on healing tendons. Ultrasound Med Biol 1990; 16: 801–807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enwemeka CS. The effects of therapeutic ultrasound on tendon healing: a biomechanical study. Amer J Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 68: 283–287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing DS, Weinstein A. Ultrasound therapy of subacromial bursitis: a double-blind trial. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 194–199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum E, Biemann I, Mustard B. Comparison of ultrasound/ultraviolet-C and laser for treatment of pressure ulcers in patients with spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 1994; 74: 812–823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byl NN, McKenzie A, Wong T, et al. Incisional wound healing: a controlled study of low and high dose ultrasound. JOSPT 1993; 18: 619–628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byl NN, McKenzie AL, West JM, et al. Low-dose ultrasound effects on wound healing: a controlled study with Yucatan pigs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 656–664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young SR, Dyson M. Effect of therapeutic ultrasound on the healing of full-thickness excised skin lesions. Ultrasonics 1990; 28: 175–180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed B, Ashikaga T. The effects of heating with ultrasound on knee joint displacement. JOSPT 1997; 26: 131–137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook SD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, et al. Acceleration of tibia and distal radius fracture healing in patients who smoke. Clin Orthop 1997; 337: 198–207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen TK, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, et al. Accelerated healing of distal radius fractures with the use of specific, low-intensity ultrasound. J Bone and Joint Surg 1997; 79A: 961–973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman JD, Ryaby JP, McCabe J, et al. Acceleration of tibial fracture-healing by non-invasive, low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. J Bone and Joint Surg 1994; 76A: 26–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kristiansen TK. The effect of low power specifically programmed ultrasound on the healing time of fresh fractures using a Colles' model. J Orthop Trauma 1990; 4: 227–228 (abs)
   Google Scholar
• Ward AR. Electricity Fields and Waves in Therapy. Marrickville, NSW: Science Press, 1986
   Google Scholar
• Chan AK, Sigelmann RA, Guy AW. Calculations of therapeutic heat generated by ultrasound in fat- muscle-bone layers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1974; BME- 21: 280–284
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann JF, DeLateur BJ, Warren CG, et al. Heating of joint structures by ultrasound. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1968; 49: 28–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehmann JF, DeLateur BJ, Silverman DR. Selective heating effects of ultrasound in human beings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1966; 47: 331–338
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson PA, Herrick JF, Krusen FH. Temperatures produced in bone marrow, bone and adjacent soft tissues by ultrasonic diathermy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1950; 31: 687–695
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Payton OD, Lamb RL, Kasey ME. Effects of therapeutic ultrasound on bone marrow in dogs. Phys Ther 1975; 55: 20–27
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janes JM, Kelly PJ, Herrick JF. The effect of highdosage ultrasonic energy on femora of the dog. J Bone and Joint Surg 1962; 44A: 1299–1307
   Google Scholar
• Ardan NI, Janes JM, Herrick JF. Ultrasonic energy and surgically produced defects in bone. J Bone and Joint Surg 1957; 39A: 394–402
   Google Scholar
• DeForest RE, Herrick JF, Janes JM, et al. Effects of ultrasound on growing bone. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1953; 34: 21–30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• NCRP. Biological Effects of Ultrasound: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1983
   Google Scholar
• Frizzell LA, Dunn F. Biophysics of ultrasound. In: Lehmann JF (ed.). Therapeutic Heat and Cold. (4th ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1990: 362–397
   Google Scholar
• Goss SA, Frizzell LA, Dunn F, et al. Dependence of the ultrasonic properties of biological tissue on constituent proteins. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 1041–1044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goss SA, Frizzell LA, Dunn F. Ultrasonic absorption and attenuation in mammalian tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol 1979; 5: 181–186
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ter Haar GR. Biological effects of ultrasound in clinical applications. In: Suslick KS (ed.). Ultrasound: Its Chemical, Physical, and Biological Effects. New York: VCH, 1988: 305–320
   Google Scholar
• ter Haar G. Basic physics of therapeutic ultrasound. Physiotherapy 1987;73: 110–113
   Google Scholar
• Chivers RC. Fundamentals of ultrasonic propagation. In: Preston RC (ed.). Output Measurements for Medical Ultrasound. London: Springer-Verlag, 1991: 19–33
   Google Scholar
• Hoogland R. Ultrasound Therapy. Delft, The Netherlands: Enraf-Nonius, 1995
   Google Scholar
• Wells PNT. Biomedical Ultrasonics. London: Academic Press, 1977
   Google Scholar
• Wells PNT. Physical Principles of Ultrasonic Diagnosis. London: Academic Press, 1969
   Google Scholar
• McDiarmid T, Ziskin MC, Michlovitz SL. Therapeutic ultrasound. In: Michlovitz SL (ed.). Thermal Agents in Rehabilitation. (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company, 1996: 168–212
   Google Scholar
• Haken BA, Frizzell LA, Carstensen EL. Effect of mode conversion on ultrasonic heating at tissue interfaces. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 387–392
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lehmann JF, DeLateur BJ. Therapeutic Heat. In: Lehmann JF (ed.). Therapeutic Heat and Cold. (4th ed.). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1990: 503–581
   Google Scholar
• Low J, Reed A. Electrotherapy Explained: Principles and Practice. (2nd ed.). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Hekkenberg RT. Characterising ultrasonic physiotherapy systems by performance and safety now internationally agreed. Ultrasonics 1998; 36: 713–720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hekkenberg R, Reibold R, Zeqiri B. Development of standard measurement methods for essential properties of ultrasound therapy equipment. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994; 20: 83–98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum EL. Ultrasound: to heat or not to heat—that is the question. Phys Ther Rev 1997; 2: 59–72
   Google Scholar
• Hekkenberg RT, Oosterbaan WA, van Beekum WT. Evaluation of ultrasound therapy devices. Physiotherapy 1986; 72: 390–395
   Google Scholar
• Evans JA. Physics—the nature of ultrasound. In: Lerski RA (ed.). Practical Ultrasound. Oxford: IRL Press, 1988: 1–13
   Google Scholar
• IEC 1689. Ultrasonics—Physiotherapy systems— Performance Requirements and Methods of Measurement in the Frequency Range 0.5 MHZ to 5 MHZ. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission, 1996
   Google Scholar
• Draper DO, Castel JC, Castel D. Rate of temperature increase in human muscle during 1 MHz and 3 MHz continuous ultrasound. JOSPT 1995; 22: 142–150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer JF. Ultrasound: evaluation of its mechanical and thermal effects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984; 65: 223–227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Haar G, Wyard SJ. Blood cell banding in ultrasonic standing wave fields: a physical analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol 1978;4: 111–123
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klug W, Franke W-G & Knoch H-G. Scintigraphic control of bone-fracture healing under ultrasonic stimulation: an animal experimental study. Eur J Nucl Med 1986; 11: 494–497
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yang K-H, Parvizi J, Wang S-J, et al. Exposure to low- intensity ultrasound increases aggrecan gene expression in a rat femur fracture model. J Orthop Res 1996; 14: 802–809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S-J, Lewallen DG, Bolander ME, et al. Low intensity ultrasound treatment increases strength in a rat femoral fracture model. J Orthop Res 1994; 12: 40–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilla AA, Mont MA, Nasser PR, et al. Non-invasive low- intensity pulsed ultrasound accelerates bone healing in the rabbit. J Orthop Trauma 1990; 4: 246–253
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyson M, Brookes M. Stimulation of bone repair by ultrasound. In: Lerski RA & Morley P (eds). Ultrasound '82. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1983: 61–66
   Google Scholar
• McMeeken J. Electrotherapy. In: Zuluaga M, Briggs C, Carlisle J, et al. (eds). Sports Physiotherapy: Applied Science and Practice. Melbourne: Churchill Livingstone, 1996: 237–238
   Google Scholar
• Dyson M, Pond J, Woodward B, et al. The production of blood cell stasis and endothelial cell damage in the blood vessels of chick embryos treated with ultrasound in a stationary waveform. Ultrasound Med Biol 1974; 1: 133–148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyson M. Therapeutic applications of ultrasound. In: Nyborg WL & Ziskin MC (eds). Biological Effects of Ultrasound. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1985: 121–133
   Google Scholar
• Ziskin MC. Report on the Safety of the Therasonics Medical Systems SAFHS Unit, Model 2A. In: PMA900009. 1989: Vol. 3, Section Vl.A.l, 209–234
   Google Scholar
• Duarte LR. The stimulation of bone growth by ultrasound. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1983; 101: 153–159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstensen EL. Acoustic cavitation and the safety of diagnostic ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 1987; 13: 597–606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai C-L, Chang WH, Liu T-K, et al. Ultrasound can affect bone healing both locally and systemically. Chin J Physiol 1991; 34: 213–222
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsai C-L, Chang WH, Liu TK. Preliminary studies of duration and intensity of ultrasonic treatments on fracture repair. Chin J Physiol 1992; 35: 21–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsai C-L, Chang WH, Liu T-K, et al. Ultrasonic effect on fracture repair and prostaglandin E2 production. Chin J Physiol 1992; 35: 27–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Singh M, Sobti VK, Roy KS. Effects of therapeutic ultrasound in healing of humerus fractures in dogs. Indian J Animal Sci 1997; 67: 210–211
   Google Scholar
• Dyson M. A review of recent experimental evidence on the effects of diagnostic ultrasound on tissue. In: Evans JA (ed.). Physics in Medical Ultrasound. London: Institute of Physical Sciences in Medicine, 1986: 1–11
   Google Scholar
• St. John Brown B. How safe is diagnostic ultrasonography? Can Med Assoc J 1984;131: 307–311
   Google Scholar
• Pye SD, Milford C. The performance of ultrasound physiotherapy machines in Lothian Region, Scotland, 1992. Ultrasound Med Biol 1994; 20: 347–359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd JJ, Evans JA. A calibration survey of physiotherapy ultrasound equipment in North Wales. Physiotherapy 1988; 74: 56–61
   Google Scholar
• Thompson SM, Fyfe MC. A survey of output characteristics of some new therapeutic ultrasound instruments manufactured in Australia. Aust J Physiother 1983; 29: 10–13
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fyfe MC, Parnell SM. The importance of measurement of effective transducer radiating area in the testing and calibration of 'therapeutic' ultrasonic instruments. Health Physics 1982; 43: 377–381
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen KGR, Battye CK. Performance of ultrasound therapy instruments. Physiotherapy 1978; 64: 174–179
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart HF, Harris GR, Herman BA, et al. Survey of use and performance of ultrasonic therapy equipment in Pinellas County, Florida. Phys Ther 1974; 54:707–714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankel VH. Results of prescription use of pulse ultrasound therapy in fracture management. In: Szab- Z, Lewis JE, Fantini GA, et al. (eds). Surgical Technology International VII. San Francisco: Universal Medical Press, 1998: 389–393
   Google Scholar
• Brueton RN, Brookes M, Heatley FW. The effect of ultrasound on the repair of a rabbits tibial osteotomy held in rigid external fixation. J Bone and Joint Surg 1987; 69B: 494 (abs)
   Google Scholar
• Tänzer M, Harvey E, Kay A, et al. Effect of noninvasive low intensity ultrasound on bone growth into porous- coated implants. J Orthop Res 1996; 14: 901–906
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xavier CAM, Duarte LR. Ultrasonic stimulation of bone callus: clinical applications. Rev Brasil Ortop 1983; 18: 73–80
   Google Scholar
• Choffie M, Duarte LR. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and effects on ununited fractures. Read at Orthopaedic Health Conference. University Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil: June 15, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Jensen JE. Stress fracture in the world class athlete: a case study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 783–787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar