Pulsed electromagnetic fields for osteogenesis and repair

References

• Einhorn TA. Enhancement of fracture healing. J Bone Joint Surg 1995; 77A: 940–56
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasuda I. Fundamental aspects of fracture treatment. JiKyoto Med Soc 1953; 4: 395–406
   Google Scholar
• Ryaby JT. Clinical effects of electromagnetic and electric fields on fracture healing. Clin Orthop 1998; 355S: S205-15
   Google Scholar
• Otter MW, McLeod KJ, Rubin C. Effects of electromagnetic fields in experimental fracture repair. Clin Orthop 1998; 355S: S91-04
   Google Scholar
• McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. Clinical use of electrical stimulation in fracture healing. Phys Med Rehabil State Art Rev 1995; 9: 67–76
   Google Scholar
• Fukada E, Yasuda I. On the piezoelectric effect of bone. JiPhysiol Soc Japan 1957; 12: 121–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran GVB, Pawluck RJ, Bassett CAL. Electromechanical characteristics of bone under physiological moisture conditions. Clin Orthop 1968; 58: 249–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedenberg ZB, Brighton CT. Bioelectric potentials in bone. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1966; 48: 915–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgens RB. Endogenous ionic currents traverse intact and damaged bone. Science 1984; 225: 478–82
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterman AL, Bora FW Jr. Electrical stimulation applied to bone and nerve injuries in the upper extremity. Orthop Clin North Am 1986; 17: 353–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett CA, Pilla A A, Pawluk RJ. A non-operative salvage of surgically-resistant pseudoarthrosis and non-unions by pulsing electromagnetic fields. A preliminary report. Clin Orthop 1977; 124: 128–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett CAL, Valdes MG, Hernandez E. Modification of fracture repair with selected pulsing electromagnetic fields. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1982; 64-A: 888–95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black J. Tissue response to exogenous electromagnetic signals. Orthop Clin North Am 1984; 15: 15–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brighton CT, Pollack SR. Treatment of recalcitrant nonunion with a capacitively coupled electric field. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1985; 67: 577–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett CAL, Mitchell SN, Gaston SR. Treatment of ununited tibial diaphyseal fractures with pulsing electromagnetic fields. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1981; 63: 511–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geier KA, Hesser K. Electrical bone stimulation for treatment of nonunion. Orthop Nurs 1985; 4: 41–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bassett CAL. The development and application of pulsed electromagnetic fields for ununited fractures and arthrodeses. Orthop Clin North Am 1984; 15: 61–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassett CA, Mitchell SN, Gaston SR. Pulsing electromagnetic field treatment in ununited fractures and failed arthrodeses. JAMA 1982; 247: 623–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sah RLY, Kim Y, Doong JH, et al. Biosynthetic response of cartilage explants to dynamic compression. J Orthop Res 1989; 7: 619–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaron RK, Ciomber DM. Synergistic effects of growth factors and pulsed fields on proteoglycan synthesis in articular cartilage. J Orthop Res 1992; 17: 527
   Google Scholar
• Shankar VS, Simon BJ, Bax CMR, et al. Effects of electromagnetic stimulation on the functional responsiveness of isolated rat osteoblasts. J Cell Physio 1998; 176: 537–44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Abbott J, Bee JA. Pulsed electromagnetic fields influence hyaline cartilage extracellular matrix composition without affecting molecular structure. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996; 4: 63–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H, Lees P, Abbott J, et al. Pulsed electromagnetic fields preserve proteoglycan composition of extracellular matrix in embryonic chick sternal cartilage. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997; 1336: 303–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaron RK, Ciomber DM. Proteoglycan synthesis in articular cartilage explants. Mol Biol 1992; 3 (Suppl): 65A
   Google Scholar
• Aaron RK, Ciomber DM. Therapeutic effects of electromagnetic fields in the stimulation of connective tissue repair. J Cell Biochem 1993; 52: 42–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torricelli P, Fini M, Giavaresi G, et al. In vitro evaluation of the effects of electromagnetic fields used for bone healing. Electroi&iMagnetobiology 1998; 17: 335–42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidovitch Z, Shanfeld J, Montgomery P, et al. Biochemical mediators of the effects of mechanical forces in electric currents on mineralized tissue. Calcif Tissue Int 1984; 36: S86-97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons RJ, Ryaby JT, Magee FP, et al. IGF-II receptor number is increased in TE-85 cells by low amplitude, low frequency electromagneitc field exposure. J Bone Miner Res 1995; 10: 812–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons RJ, Ryaby JT, Magee FP, et al. Combined magnetic fields increase IGF-II secretion in osteoblast cultures. Endocrinology 1995; 136: 3100–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryaby JT, Fitzsimmons RJ, Khin NA, et al. The role of insulin-like growth factor in magnetic field regulation of bone formation. Bioelectrochem Bioenerg 1994; 35: 87–91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhuang H, Wang W, Seldes RM, et al. Electrical stimulation induces the level of TGF-B1 mRNA in osteoblastic cells by a mechanism involving calcium/ calmodulin pathway Biochem Biophys Res Comm 1997; 237: 225–9
   Google Scholar
• Simmons DJ, Wood J, Wajorajch M, et al. Effect of magnetic fields on linear and radial bone growth in rats-a circadian study. J Bioelectric 1986; 5: 187–99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Riola J, Pamies J A, Hernandez ER, et al. Influence of electromagnetic fields on bone mass and growth in developing rats: a morphometric, densitometric, and histomorphometric study. Calcif Tissue Int 1997; 60: 533–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. The effect of low-frequency electrical fields on osteogenesis. J Bone Jt Surg 1992; 74-A: 920–9
   Google Scholar
• McLeod KJ, Rubin CT. The effect of low-frequency electrical fields on osteogenesis. J Bone Joint Surg 1992; 74A: 920–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skerry T, Pead M, Lanyon L. Modulation of bone loss during disuse by pulsed electromagnetic fields. J Orthop Res 1991; 9: 600–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin CT, McLeod KJ, Lanyon LE. Prevention of osteoporosis by pulsed electromagnetic fields. J Bone Joint Surg 1989; 71A: 411–6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito M, Fay LA, Ito Y, et al. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on instrumented posterolateral spinal fusion and device-related stress shielding. Spine 1997; 22: 382–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazer PA, Heilmann MR, Lotz JC, et al. Use of electromagnetic fields in a spinal fusion. Spine 1997; 22: 2351–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darendeliler MA, Darendeliler A, Sinclair PM. Effects of static magnetic and pulsed electromagneitc fields on bone healing. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1997; 12: 43–53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Landry PS, Sadasivan KK, Marino AA, et al. Electromagnetic fields can affect osteogenesis by increasing the rate of differentiation. Clin Orthop 1997; 338: 262–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law HT, Annan I, McCarthy ID, et al. The effect of induced electrical currents on bone after experimental osteotomy in sheep. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1985; 67: 463–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller GJ, Burchardt H, Enneking WF, et al. Electromagnetic stimulation of canine bone grafts. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1984; 66: 693–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grace KLR, Revell WJ, Brookes M. The effects of pulsed electromagnetism on fresh fracture healing: osteochondral repair in the rat femoral groove. Orthopedics 1998; 21: 297–302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontanesi G, Giancecchi F, Rotini R, et al. Treatment of delayed union and pseudoarthrosis by low frequency pulsing electromagnetic stimulation: Study of 35 cases. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 1983; 9: 305–18
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinsenkamp M, Ryaby J & Burney F. Treatment of nonunion by pulsing electromagnetic fields: European multicenter study of 308 cases. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 1985; 19: 147–51
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharrard WJW. A double-blind trial of pulsed electromagnetic fields for delayed union of tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg 1990; 72-B: 347–355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes GB. Treatment of delayed unions and nonunions of the proximal fifth metatarsal with pulsed electromagnetic fields. Foot Ankle Int 1994; 15: 552–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams BD, Frykman GK, Taleisnik J. Treatment of scaphoid nonunion with casting and pulsed electromagnetic fields: a study continuation. J Hand Surg 1992; 17A: 910–4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borsalino G, Bagnacani M, Bettati E, et al. Electrical stimulation of human femoral intertrochanteric osteotomies. Clini Orthop 1988; 237: 256–63
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mammi GI, Rocchi R, Cadossi R, et al. The electrical stimulation of tibial osteotomies. Clin Orthop 1993; 288: 246–53 -
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy WF, Roberts CG, Zuege RC, et al. Use of electromagnetic fields in treatment of loosened cemented hip prostheses. Clin Orthop 1993; 286: 198–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabrah K, Hoffmeier M, Gilgert F, et al. Bone density changes in osteoporosis prone women exposed to pulsed electromagnetic fields. J Bone Miner Res 1990; 5: 437–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyres KS, Saleh M, Kanis JA. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on bone formation and bone loss during limb lengthening. Bone 1996; 18: 505–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aaron RK, Lennox D, Bunce G, et al. The conservative treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A comparison of core decompression and pulsing electromagnetic fields. Clin Orthop 1989; 249: 209–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trock DH, Bollet AJ, Markoll R. The effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee and cervical spine. Report of randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trials. J Rheumatol 1994; 21: 1903–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernoff N, Rogers JM, Kavet R. A review of the literature on potential reproductive and developmental toxicity of electric and magnetic fields. Toxicology 1992; 74: 91–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Sagredo JM, Monteagudo JL. Effect of low-level pulsed electromagnetic fields on human chromosomes in vitro: analysis of chromosomal aberrations. Hereditas 1991; 115: 9–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong B, Theriault G, Guenel P, et al. Association between exposure to pulsed electromagnetic fields and cancer in electric utility workers in Quebec, Canada, and France. Am J Epidemiol 1994; 140: 805–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savitz DA, Dufort V, Armstrong B, et al. Lung cancer in relation to employment in the electric utility industry and exposure to magnetic fields. Occup Environ Med 1997; 54: 396–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar