Advanced search
Publication Cover
Public Archaeology Volume 1, 2001 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
583
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Decoding ethics

Sarah Tarlow
Pages 245-259 | Published online: 19 Jul 2013

  • Agier, M. Comment on Pels. Current Anthropology 40(2) (1999), 114-5.
  • Amborn, H. Comment on Pels. Current Anthropology 40(2) (1999), 115-6.
  • Bahn, P. Do not disturb? Archaeology and the rights of the dead. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 3(1) (1984), 127-39.
  • Bahn, P. and Paterson, R. The last rights: more on archaeology and the dead. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 5(3) (1986), 255-7
  • Barley, N. Dancing on the Grave: Encounters with Death. John Murray, London (1995).
  • Barnes, J. Comment on Pels. Current Anthropology 40(2) (1999), 116.
  • Bernbeck, R. and Pollock, S. Ayodhya, archaeology and identity. Current Anthropology 37( Supplement) (1996) Si, 38–42.
  • Bersoff, D. Explicit ambiguity: the 1992 ethics code as an oxymoron. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 25(4) (1994), 382-7.
  • Bloch, M. Placing the Dead. Seminar Press, London and New York (1971).
  • Chippindale, C. and Pendergast, D. Intellectual property: ethics, knowledge and publication. In: Lynott, M. And Wylie, A. (eds) Ethics in American Archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s. Society for American Archaeology, Washington (1995), 45–9.
  • Clarke, D. Archaeology : the loss of innocence. Antiquity 47 (1973), 6–18.
  • Cleere, H. Reply to Holtorf. The European Archaeologist 6(1997), 11-12.
  • Crossland, Z. Excavating Argentina & apos;s ‘Disappeared’. Archaeological Dialogues ( forthcoming).
  • Copans,J. Comment on Pels. Current Anthropology 40(2) (1999), 116-8.
  • Cox, M. Crypt archaeology after Spitalfields: dealing with our recent dead. Antiquity 70 (1996), 8-10.
  • Cumberpatch, C. and Blinkhorn, P. Clients, contractors, curators and archaeology: who owns the past? In Pluciennik, M. (ed.) The Responsibilities of Archaeologists. BAR, Oxford ( forthcoming)
  • Downer, A. Archaeologists-Native American relations. In: Swidler, N., Dongoske, K., Anyon, R. and Downer, A. (eds.) Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground. Altamira, Walnut Creek, Ca. (1997), 23-34.
  • Fabian,J. Time and the Other: How Anthropology makes its Object. Columbia University Press, New York (1983)
  • Ferguson, T.]., Dongoske, K., Yeatts, M. and Jenkins, L. Working together: Hopi oral history and archaeology, part II: implementation. SAA Bulletin 13(3) (1995), 10-13.
  • Field, L. Complicities and collaborations: anthropologists and the ‘Unacknowledged Tribes’ of California. Current Anthropology 40(2) (1999), 193-209.
  • Fischer, E. Cultural logic and Maya identity: rethinking constructivism and essentialism. Current Anthropology 40(4) (1999), 473-99.
  • Geary, P. Sacred commodities: the circulation of medieval relics. In: Appadurai, A. (ed.) The Social Life of Things. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986), 169-191
  • Goldstein, L. and Kintigh, K. Ethics and the reburial controversy. American Antiquity 55(3) (1990), 585-91.
  • Hamilakis, Y. La trahison des archeologues? Archaeological practice as intellectual activity in postmodernity. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 12(1) (1999), 60-79.
  • Hammil, J. and Cruz, R. Statement of American Indians against desecration before the WorId Archaeological Congress. In: Layton, R. (ed.) Conflictin the Archaeology of Living Traditions. Routledge, London (1989), 195-200.
  • Historic Scotland. The Treatment of Human Remains in Archaeology. Historic Scotland, Edinburgh (1997).
  • Hodder, I. Interpretive archaeology and its role. American Antiquity 56 (1991), 7-18.
  • Holtorf, C. Problems with an EAA code of ethics. The European Archaeologist 6 (1997), 10-11.
  • Houtman, G. Human remains and the Vermillion Accord. Anthropology Today 6(1) (1990), 23-4.
  • Hubert, J. A proper place for the dead: a critical review of the ‘reburial’ issue. In: Layton, R. (ed.) Conflict in the Archaeology of Living Traditions. Unwin Hyman, London (1989).
  • Jemison, G. P. Who owns the past? In: Swidler, N., Dongoske, K., Anyon, R. and Downer, A. (eds.) Native Americans and Archaeologists: Stepping Stones to Common Ground. Altamira, Walnut Creek, Ca. (1997), 57-63.
  • Jones, D. G. and Harris, R. Archaeological human remains: scientific, cultural and ethical considerations. Current Anthropology 39(2) (1998), 253-64.
  • Jupp, P. From Dust to Ashes: Replacement of Burial by Cremation in England 1840-1967. Congregation Memorial Hall Trust, London (1990).
  • Kavanaugh, P. An ethic of free association: questioning a uniform and coercive code of ethics. Psychoanalytic Review 86(4) (1999), 643-62.
  • Kitchen, W. From Croatia to Cape Town: the future of the World Archaeological Congress. Antiquity 72 (1998), 747-50.
  • Lampeter Archaeological Workshop. Relativism, objectivity and the politics of the past. Archaeological Dialogues 4(2) (1997), 164-84.
  • Leone, M. The relationship between artifacts and the public in outdoor history museums. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 376 (1981), 301-13.
  • Leone, M. A historical archaeology of capitalism. American Anthropologist 97(2) (1995), 251-68.
  • Levy, J. Ethics code of the American Anthropological Association and its relevance for the SAA. In: Lynott, M. and Wylie, A. (eds) Ethics in American Archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s. Society for American Archaeology, Washington (1995), 86-93.
  • Lynott, M. Ethical principles and archaeological practice: development of an ethics policy. American Antiquity 62(4) (1997) 589-99.
  • Lynott, M. and A. Wylie. Stewardship: the central principle of archaeological ethics. In M. Lynott and A. Wylie (eds) Ethics in American archaeology: challenges for the 1990s. Washington: Society for American Archaeology (1995) 28-32.
  • Macdonald, R. Developing a code of ethics for museums. Curator 34(3) (1991), 178-186.
  • Macdonald, R. Ethics: constructing a code for all of America’s museums. Museum News 71(3) (1992), 62-5
  • MacIntyre, A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Duckworth, London (1981).
  • McManamon, F. The many publics for archaeology. American Antiquity 56(1) (1991), 121-30.
  • McNaughton, D. Moral Vision: An Introduction to Ethics. Blackwell, Oxford (1988).
  • Meighan, C. Burying American archaeology. In K. Vitelli (ed.) Archaeological Ethics. Altamira, Walnut Creek, Ca. (1996), 209-13.
  • Moore, H. Ethics and ontology: why agents and agency matter. In: Dobres, M. and Robb, J. (eds) Agency in Archaeology. Routledge, London (2000), 259-63.
  • Mulvaney, D.J. Past regained, future lost: the Kow Swamp Pleistocene burials. Antiquity 65 (1991), 12–21.
  • Parker Pearson, M. Ethics and the dead in British archaeology. The Field Archaeologist 23(1995), 17-18.
  • Parker Pearson, M. The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Sutton, Stroud (1999).
  • Pels, P. Professions of duplexity: a prehistory of ethical codes in anthropology. Current Anthropology 40(2) (1999), 101-136.
  • Potter, P. What is the use of plantation archaeology? Historical Archaeology 23(3) (1991), 94-107.
  • Rao, N. Interpreting silences: symbol and history in the case of Ramjanmabhoomi/ Babri Masjid. In: Bond, C. And Gilliam, A. (eds) Social Construction of the Past: Representation as Power. Unwin Hyman, London (1994), 154-64.
  • Reeve, J. Do we need a policy on the treatment of human remains? The Archaeologist 33 (1998), 11-12.
  • Reeve, J. and Adams, M. The Spitalfields Project 1: The Archaeology: Across the Styx. Council for British Archaeology, York (1993).
  • Rosenberg, R. Beyond the code of ethics: the responsibility of professional societies. Computers and Society 28(2) (1998), 18-25.
  • Salmon, M. Ethical considerations in anthropology and archaeology, or relativism and justice for all. Journal of Anthropological Research 53 (1997), 47–63.
  • Shanks, M. and Tilley, C. Re-constructing Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987a).
  • Shanks, M. and Tilley, C. Social Theory and Archaeology. Polity Press, Cambridge (1987b).
  • Shuster, E. The Nuremberg code: Hippocratic ethics and human rights. The Lancet 351 (1998), 974–77.
  • Sillar, B. The social life of the Andean dead. Archaeolo gical Review from Cambridge 11(1) (1992), 107–24.
  • Thomas, J. Maintaining the open space. Antiquity72(1998), 751–2.
  • Tilley, C. Archaeology as socio-political action in the present. In: Pinsky, V. and Wylie, A. (eds) Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989).
  • Turner, E. The souls of my dead brothers. In: Layton, R. (ed.) Conflict in the Archaeology of Living Traditions. Routledge, London (1989), 189-94.
  • Ucko, P. Foreword. In: Shennan, S. (ed.) Archaeological Approaches to Cultural Identity. Unwin Hyman, London (1989), ix-xx.
  • Vizenor, G. Bone courts: the rights and narrative representation of tribal bones. In: Hodder, I. and Preucel, R. (eds). Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: A Reader. Routledge, London (1996 [1986]), 652-63.
  • Watson, J. Of flesh and bones: the management of death pollution in Cantonese society. In: Bloch, M. and Parry, J. (eds). Death and the Regeneration of Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982), 155-86.
  • Williams, B. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Fontana, London (1985).
  • Wolf, E. Europe and the People without History. University of California Press, Berkeley (1982).
  • Wolf-child 2000. Speaking for the ancestors(http://www.warband.org.uk/words_of_wisdom/speaking_for_the_ancestors.htm)
  • Woodburn, J. Social dimensions of death in four African hunting and gathering societies. In: Bloch, M. and Parry, J. (eds). Death and the Regeneration of Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982), 187-210
  • Wylie, A. The philosophy of ambivalence: Sandra Harding on the science question in feminism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, suppl. 13 (1987), 59-73.
  • Wylie, A. Gender theory and the archaeological record: why is there no archaeology of gender? In: Gero, J. and Conkey, M. (eds) Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Blackwell, Oxford (1991), 31-54.
  • Wylie, A. Ethical dilemmas in archaeological practice: looting, repatriation, stewardship and the (trans)formation of disciplinary identity. Perspectives on Science 4(2) (1996), 154-94.
  • Zimmerman, L. The impact of concepts of time and the past on the concept of archaeology: some lessons from the reburial issue.Archaeological Review from Cambridge 6(1) (1987), 42-50.
  • Zimmerman, L. Made radical by my own: an archaeologist learns to accept reburial. In: Layton, R. (ed.) Conflict in the Archaeology of Living Traditions. Unwin Hyman, London (1989), 60-7.
  • Zimmerman, L. Regaining our nerve: ethics, values and the transformation of archaeology. In: Lynott, M. And Wylie, A. (eds) Ethics in American Archaeology: Challenges for the 1990s. Society for American Archaeology, Washington (1995), 64-7.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.