An Analysis of High School Counselors' Knowledge and Perceptions of NCAA Freshman Eligibility Requirements

References

• Bailey, W. (1991). Achieving integrity in intercollegiate athletics. AGB occasional paper No. 12. Washington, DC: Association of Governing Boards of Universities and Colleges,
   Google Scholar
• Blayden, J. & Pemberton, C. (2002). An investigation of NCAA initial eligibility waiver applications and awards from 1999 to 2001. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 13 (1), 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dickman, D. & Lammell, J. (2000). Getting to the core of student athletic standards. Principal Leadership, 1 (2), 30–32. Retrieved August 28, 2002, from the WilsonSelectPlus database.
   Google Scholar
• Educational Directories, Inc. (2002, September). Educational Directories, Inc. Shaumburg, IL: Linda Moody.
   Google Scholar
• Geiser, J. (1995 ). Knowledge and awareness of NCAA proposal number 16 among student-athletes and principals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. & Chandler, T. (1995). Sports counseling: Enhancing the development of the high school athlete. Journal of Counseling and Development, 74 (1), 39–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hishinuma, E. (1999). An update on NCAA college freshman academic requirements. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32 (4), 362–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzman, L. (1997). An historical analysis of NCAA freshman eligibility. Unpublished master's thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Koeler, M. (1995). Student athletes and high schools: Let's shift the focus. Clearing House, 68 (3), 158–160. Retrieved September 9, 2002 from the Academic Search Elite database.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W. (1997). Ganden v NCAA: How the NCAA's efforts to clean up its image have created an ethical and legal dilemma. Marquette Sports Law Journal, 7 Marq. Sports L. J. 465. Retrieved September 9, 2002, from the Lexis-Nexis database.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, R. & Miller, M. (1994). A study of the historical academic control measures in intercollegiate athletics (Report No. HE027716). U.S.: Alabama. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED374710).
   Google Scholar
• Newman, R. & Miller, M. (1995). Attitudes of high school personnel toward NCAA academic integrity reform measures and proposals (Report No. HE028516). U.S.: Arkansas. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED386108).
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, J. (1998). Sports rules—Deserving students and school reformers suffer: The tragic impact of the NCAA's efforts to impose standards on high schools. Teachers College Record, 100 (1), 150–154. Retrieved July 30, 2002, from the Academic Search Elite database.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Collegiate Athletic Association (2002). NCAA 2002–2003 Guide for the College-Bound Student-Athlete. Retrieved September 9, 2002, from http://www.ncaa.org/eligibility/cbsa/academic.html
   Google Scholar
• National Collegiate Athletic Association (2005). NCAA 2004–2005 Guide for the College-Bound Student-Athlete. Retrieved December 10, 2005, from http://www.ncaa.org/eligibility/cbsa/academic.html
   Google Scholar
• Petr, T. (1988). Bylaw 5–1-(j): A historical perspective. New Perspectives, 19 (1), 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Renfro, W. (2002). NCAA Division I Management Counsel approves academic reform package (NCAA Press Release). Indianapolis, IN: National Collegiate Athletic Association. Retrieved, October 23, 2002, from http://ncaa.org/releases/makepage.cgi/divi/2002102201d.htm
   Google Scholar
• Roenbeck, T. 1988. Awareness of, satisfaction with, perceived changes to, and the impact of NCAA bylaw 5–1 -(j) among principals, guidance counselors and coaches in 49 selected Columbus, Ohio area high schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State University, Columbus.
   Google Scholar
• Sain vs. CEDAR RAPIDS COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT. No. 98–2273. [155], April 25, 2001
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. (1983). Preludes to the NCAA: Early failures of faculty intercollegiate athletic control. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 54 (4), 372–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timeline - 1990 to 1999. (December 20, 1999). The NCAA News. Retrieved December 28, 2003, from http://www.ncaa.org/news/1999/19991220/active/3626n27.html.
   Google Scholar
• United States Department of Justice (1998). NCAA consent decree: United States of America v. National Collegiate Athletic Association. Retrieved December 6, 2000, from http://www.usdoj.gov/crt/ada/ncaa.htm.
   Google Scholar