Roles and Tasks of the Senior Woman Administrator (SWA) in Intercollegiate Athletics: A Role Congruity Perspective

References

• Acosta, R., & Carpenter, L. (2008). Women in intercollegiate sport: A longitudinal study - thirty-one year update 1977–2008. Retrieved July 27, 2008 at http://www.acostacarpenter.org
   Google Scholar
• Atwater, L., Brett, J., Waldman, D., DiMare, L., & Hayden, M. (2004). Men’s and women’s perceptions of the gender typing of management subroles. Sex Roles, 50, 191–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, L., Grappendorf, H., Field, G., & Lilienthal, S. (2006, June). Does athletic participation matter for women? Examining hiring preferences to entry-level management positions using role congruity theory. Paper presented at the North American Society for Sport Management Annual Convention, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Claussen, C., & Lehr, C. (2002). Decision-making authority of senior woman administrators. International Journal of Sport Management, 3, 215–228.
   Google Scholar
• Cundiff, H. (1985 ). A comparison of roles and tasks between randomly selected NCAA Division I, II, and III athletic directors. (Doctoral dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. 1984). Dissertation Abstracts International, 45/08, 2323.
   Google Scholar
• Diekman, A., & Goodfriend, W. (2006). A role congruity perspective on gender norms. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 369–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diekman, A., & Eagly, A. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. (1987) Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A., & Karau, S. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychology Review, 109, 573–598.
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P. (1991 ). Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Rolesi25, 351–378.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, R.O., O’Connor, M.E., Jones, W., & Mihelich, M.H. (1980). Role relevant sex typing and opportunity in agentic and communal domains. Journal of Personality, 48, 419–434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, L., & Lynch, A. (2005). Social role theory and the perceived gender role orientation of athletes. Sex Roles, 52, 227–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawes, K. (2002, January 7). Sweet Role: NCAA senior woman administrator builds new position. The NCAA News. Retrieved January 10, 2003 at http://ncaa.org/news/2002/20020107/active/3901n02.html.
   Google Scholar
• Hosick, M. (2005, February 14). CWA takes subcommittee approach on future issues: Priorities include SWA role, practice policies. The NCAA News, p. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis, S. (1988). The representation of women in university athletic programs. Journal of Sport Management, 2, 14–25.
   Google Scholar
• Inglis, S., Danylchuk, K., & Pastore, D. (2000). Multiple realities of women’s work experiences in coaching and athletic management. Women in Sport & Physical Activity Journal, 9, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, B. (1993). Changes in the perceived roles and tasks of NCAA Division I, II, and III athletic directors in light of changes in the economy since 1983–1984. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of New Mexico at Albuquerque.
   Google Scholar
• Judd, M. (1996). A gender comparison of competencies important for success in college athletic administration. Physical Educator, 52, 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Judd, P., & Oswald, P. (1997). Employment desirability: The interactive effects of gender-profile, stimulus sex, and gender-typed occupation. Sex Roles, 37, 467–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levick, C. (2002, October 11). NCAA committee on women’s athletics chronology of work completed. Presented at the National Association of Collegiate Women Athletic Administrators Fall Forum, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, J. (2003, May 13). Notes on the past status of intercollegiate athletics for women. Paper presented at the Women’s Leadership Symposium in Intercollegiate Athletics, Columbus, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• National Association for Intercollegiate Athletics (NAIA). (2007). Member institutions information: National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics. Available at http://naia.cstv.com/member-services/about/members.htm
   Google Scholar
• National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2006). Division I manual 2006–2007:Constitution, operating bylaws, administrative bylaws. NCAA Educational Services: Indianapolis, IN.
   Google Scholar
• NCAA Legislative Database (1987). Division III policy interpretation for women in administrative structure. LSBDI database service available at http://www.ncaa.org
   Google Scholar
• NCAA Legislative Database (2003). Division II proposal for SWA. LSBDI database service available at http://www.ncaa.org
   Google Scholar
• NCAA Interpretation (1987). NCAA by-law interpretation for institutions administrative designees. Retrieved June 28, 2003 at https://goomer.ncaa.org/wdbctx/LSDBis/LSDBI.home
   Google Scholar
• NCAA Division II Management Council (1999). The senior woman administrator position. NCAA Division II Project Team Report. Retrieved January 24, 2007 at http://www.ncaa.org/governance/d2_2002_review/swa.pdf
   Google Scholar
• NCAA. (2002). How to strengthen your athletics management team: Involving your Senior Woman Administrator. [Brochure]. Indianapolis, IN: NCAA Educational Services.
   Google Scholar
• National Junior College Athletic Association (NJCAA). (2007). Membership directory. Available at http://www.njcaa.org/membershipdirectory.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Pent, A., & Grappendorf, H. (2007). Financial decision making and NCAA Senior Women Administrators. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 116.
   Google Scholar
• Raphaely, D. (2003, April 8). An analysis of the senior woman administrator position within NCAA athletics departments. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. University of San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, B., & Yoder, J. (2004). Gender differences in leadership emergence persist even for dominant women: An updated confirmation of role con- gruity theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 187–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, J., Tiell, B., Goff, A., Kovalchik, M., & Stallman, R. (2006, March 13). Clarification of the senior woman administrator designation. Paper presented at Live NCAA Web Cast, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• West, C. (1999, June). Notes on the history of women in intercollegiate athletics. Presentation at the National Association of Intercollegiate Athletic Administrators and Higher Education Resource Center Midwest (NACWAA/HERS) Institute for Administrative Advancement, Bryn Mar, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J., & Miller, D. (1983). Sex-role orientation and athletic administration. Sex Roles, 9, 1137–1149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar