Engineering History, or the History of Engineering? Re-Writing the Technological Past

REFERENCES

• Throughout this lecture, I have used the following abbreviations: EcHR, Economic History Review HoT, History of Technology T&C, Technology and Culture TNS, Transactions of the Newcomen Society
   Google Scholar
• Dictionary of National Biography, 1951–1960 (Oxford, 1971), pp. 300–01; C. Singer, 'The HappyScholar: The First Dickinson Memorial Lecture', TNS, vol. 29 (1953–55), pp. 123–36; J. Foster Petree, 'Some Reflections on Engineering Biography: The Eighth Dickinson Memorial Lecture', TNS, vol. 40 (1967–68), pp. 147–57.
   Google Scholar
• A. Titley, 'Presidential Address', TNS, vol. 1 (1920–21), pp. 65–76; L.St.L. Pendred, 'Presidential Address — The Value of Technological History', TNS, vol. 4 (1923–24), pp. 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• E.W. Hulme, 'Introduction to the Literature of Historical Engineering to the Year 1640', TNS, vol. 1(1920–21), p. 11. See also S.B. Hamilton, 'Why Engineers Should Study History', TNS, vol. 25 (1945–47), p. 9.
   Google Scholar
• S.B. Hamilton, 'Sixty Glorious Years: The Impact of Engineering on Society in the Reign of Queen Victoria', TNS, vol. 31(1957–59), pp. 182–94; C.E. Lee, 'Railway Engineering: Its Impact on Civilisation', TNS, vol. 36 (1963–64), pp. 109–131; L.T.C. Rolt, 'The History of the History of Engineering', TNS, vol. 42 (1969–70), pp. 149–58; W.H. Chaloner, Was there a Decline of the Industrial Spirit in Britain, 1850-1939?', TNS, vol. 55 (1983–84), pp. 211–18; H. Ford, 'Energy — The Key to the History of Engineering', TNS, vol. 63 (1991–92), pp. 209–16; R. Fox, 'Diversity and Diffusion: the Transfer of Technologies in the Industrial Age', TNS, vol. 70 (1998–99), pp. 185–96.
   Google Scholar
• C.E. Lee, 'Fourth Biennial Dickinson Memorial Lecture: Introductory Remarks by the President', TNS, vol. 32(1959–60), p. 112.
   Google Scholar
• L.T.C. Rolt, Isambard Kingdom Brunel (London, 1965); idem, Thomas Telford (London, 1958); idem, George and Robert Stephenson (London, 1960).
   Google Scholar
• T.P. Hughes, 'The Order of the Technological World', HoT, vol. 5 (1980), pp. 1–17; cf. D. MacKenzie, 'Marx and the Machine', T&C, vol. 25 (1984), pp. 473–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Titley, 'Presidential Address', TNS, vol. 1(1920–21), p. 65.
   Google Scholar
• The literature on these controversies is vast. I found the following especially helpful: R.L. Heilbroner, `Do Machines Make History?', T&C, vol. 8 (1967), pp. 335–45; N. Rosenberg, 'Technology and the Environment: An Economic Exploration', T&C, vol. 12 (1971), pp. 543–62; Technology in Western Civilisation, eds M. Kranzberg and C.W. Russell, Jr, 2 vols (New York, 1967); Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, eds L. Marz and M. Roe Smith (Cambridge, MA, 1994).
   Google Scholar
• A.R. Hall, 'Where is the History of Technology?', HoT, vol. 22 (2000), pp. 203–09; R.A. Buchanan, 'Reflections on the Decline of the History of Technology in Britain', ibid., pp. 211–21; H.S. Torrens, 'Some Thoughts on the History of Technology and its Current Condition in Britain', ibid., pp. 223–32.
   Google Scholar
• C. Singer, Technology and History (L.T. Hobhouse Memorial Lecture, no. 21, London, 1952); A History of Technology, eds C. Singer et al., 5 vols (Oxford, 1954–58).
   Google Scholar
• T.C. Barker, 'The Beginnings of the Economic History Society', EcHR, 2nd. ser., vol. 30 (1977), pp. 1–19; Social Change and Revolution in England, 1540–1640, ed. L. Stone (London, 1965); The Standard of Living in Britain in the Industrial Revolution, ed. A.J. Taylor (London, 1975).
   Google Scholar
• M. Kranzberg, 'At the Start', T&C, vol. 1(1959–60), pp. 1–10; J.M. Standenmaier, Technology's Storytellers: Reweaving the Human Fabric (Cambridge, MA, 1985), pp. 1–14, 202-09.
   Google Scholar
• R.S. Woodbury, 'The Scholarly Future of the History of Technology', T&C, vol. 1 (1959–60), pp. 345–48; E.T. Layton, 'Technology as Knowledge', T&C, vol. 15 (1974), pp. 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• For three valuable surveys, see: T.P. Hughes, 'Emerging Themes in the History of Technology', T&C, vol. 20 (1979), pp. 697–711; D.A. Hounshell, 'On the Discipline of the History of American Technology', Journal of American History, vol. 67 (1981), pp. 854–65; J. Standenmaier, 'Recent Trends in the History of Technology', American Historical Review, vol. 95 (1990), pp. 715–25.
   Google Scholar
• N.B. Harte, 'Trends in Publications on the Economic and Social History of Great Britain and Ireland, 1925-74', EcHR, 2nd ser., vol. 30 (1977), pp. 20–41; D.C. Coleman, History and the Economic Past: An Account of the Rise and Decline of Economic History in Britain (Oxford, 1987), pp. 93–127.
   Google Scholar
• J. Simmons, 'Technology in History', HoT, vol. 3 (1978), pp. 1–12; R.A. Buchanan, 'History of Technology in the Teaching of History', ibid., pp. 13–27. For the involvement of Hall, Harris and Buchanan in the affairs of the Newcomen Society, see their contributions cited below in note 20.
   Google Scholar
• L.T.C. Rolt, op. cit. (5), p. 156; P. Mathias, The Transformation of England: Essays in the Economic and Social History of England in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1979), p. 40. See also J.R. Harris, Industry and Technology in the Eighteenth Century: Britain and France (Birmingham, 1973), p. 3; S. Lilley, 'Technological Progress and the Industrial Revolution', in The Fontana Economic History of Europe, ed. C. Cipolla, vol. 3, The Industrial Revolution (London, 1973), p. 254.
   Google Scholar
• 'The Newcomen Society: Diamond Jubilee: A Symposium to Commemorate the Sixtieth Anniversary of the Founding of the Society', TNS, vol. 51(1979–80), pp. 193–228. See especially the following articles: D.G. Tucker, 'Interpretations of the History of Technology and the Newcomen Society Tradition', pp. 197–201; A.R. Hall, 'The History of Technology in Relation to the History of Science', pp. 206–09; J.R. Harris, 'Economic History and the History of Technology', pp. 210–13; R.A. Buchanan, 'Industrial Archaeology in Relation to the History of Technology', pp. 214–19. See also D.G. Tucker, 'Conference Report: Diamond Jubilee of the Newcomen Society: the Science Museum, London, November 18,1980', T&C, vol. 23 (1982), pp. 73–77.
   Google Scholar
• D.C. Coleman, History and the Economic Past (Oxford, 1987), pp. 126–48; R.J. Evans, In Defence of History (London, 1997), pp. 278–79; M.J. Daunton, 'What is Economic History', in What is History Today?, ed. J. Gardiner (London, 1988), pp. 37–38.
   Google Scholar
• A. Roland, 'What Hath Kranzberg Wrought?', T&C, vol. 38 (1997), p. 698; H.S. Torrens, op. cit. (11), pp. 224–25.
   Google Scholar
• See, for example, the following essays in Marx and Roe Smith, Does Technology Drive History? (Cambridge, MA, 1994): P. Scranton, 'Determinism and Indeterminacy in the History of Technology', pp. 143–68; R. Williams, 'The Political and Feminist Dimensions of Technological Determinism', pp. 217–35; L. Marx, 'The Idea of "Technology" and Postmodern Pessimism', pp. 237–57.
   Google Scholar
• D. Edgerton, 'Reflections on the History of Technology in Britain', HoT, vol. 22 (2000), pp. 181–87; G. Gooday, 'The Flourishing of History of Technology in the United Kingdom: A Critique of Antiquarian Complaints of Neglect', ibid., pp. 189–201; I. Inkster, 'Pursuing Big Books: Technological Change in Global History', ibid., pp. 233–53.
   Google Scholar
• R.A. Buchanan, 'Theory and Narrative in the History of Technology', T&C, vol. 32 (1991), pp. 365–76.
   Google Scholar
• P. Hudson, The Industrial Revolution (London, 1992), pp. 9–10; C. MacLeod, 'James Watt, Heroic Invention and the Idea of the Industrial Revolution', in Technological Revolutions in Europe: Historical Perspectives, eds M. Berg and K. Bruland (Cheltenham, 1998), pp. 96–115.
   Google Scholar
• Hudson, Industrial Revolution, pp. 13–15, 25; P. Mantoux, The Industrial Revolution in the Eighteenth Century (London, 1928), pp. 42–43; N. Rosenberg, Schumpeter and the Endogeneity of Technology: Some American Perspectives (London, 2000), pp. 1–18; T.S. Ashton, The Industrial Revolution, 1760–1830 (Oxford, 1948), p. 48.
   Google Scholar
• D. Cannadine, 'The Present and the Past in the English Industrial Revolution, 1880-1980', Past & Present, no. 103 (1984), pp. 133–37.
   Google Scholar
• J.H. Clapham, An Economic History of Modern Britain, 3 vols (Cambridge, 1926–38), vol. 1, TheEarly Railway Age, 1820–1850, pp. viii, 41,66,142-45,155. See also R. Jenkins, 'Presidential Address: Observations on the Rise and Progress of Manufacturing Industry in England', TNS, vol. 7 (1926–27), p. 13.
   Google Scholar
• D. Cannadine, op. cit. (28), pp. 149–56.
   Google Scholar
• D. Landes, The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (Cambridge, 1969), pp. 41–42; P. Deane, The First Industrial Revolution (Cambridge, 1967), pp. 118, 119-24,127-33.
   Google Scholar
• E.J. Hobsbawm, Labouring Men: Studies in the History of Labour (London, 1964), pp. 64–125; E.P. Thompson, The Making of the English Working Class (London, 1965), esp. pp. 314–49.
   Google Scholar
• H.J. Habakkuk, American and British Technology in the Nineteenth Century: The Search for Labour-Saving Inventions (Cambridge, 1967); A.E. Musson and E. Robinson, Science and Technology in the Industrial Revolution (Manchester, 1969); Science, Technology and Economic Growth in the Eighteenth Century, ed. A.E. Musson (London, 1972); Mathias, Transformation of England (London, 1979), pp. 21–87.
   Google Scholar
• D. Cannadine, op. cit. (28), pp. 159–67.
   Google Scholar
• G.R. Hawke, Railways and Economic Growth in England and Wales, 1840–1870 (Oxford, 1970), esp. pp. 196, 405; G.N. von Tunzelman, Steam Power and British Industrialisation to 1870 (Oxford, 1978), p. 8, chs 5–7; E.L. Jones, Growth Recurring: Economic Change in World History (Oxford, 1988), pp. 19, 54.
   Google Scholar
• D.S. Landes, The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some are So Rich and Some So Poor (London, 1998), pp. 45–59, 186–9; idem, 'The Fable of the Dead Horse; or, the Industrial Revolution Revisited', in The British Industrial Revolution: An Economic Perspective, ed. J. Mokyr, 2nd edn (Boulder, CO, 1999), pp. 128–59; J. Mokyr, 'Technological Change, 1700-1830', in The Economic History of Britain since 1700, eds R. Floud and D. McCloskey, 2nd edn, 3 vols (Cambridge, 1994), vol. 1, pp. 41–43.
   Google Scholar
• C. Sabel and J. Zeitlin, 'Historical Alternatives to Mass Production', Past & Present, no. 108 (1985), p. 141; M. Berg, The Age of Manufactures: Industry, Innovation and Work in Britain, 1700–1820 (London, 1985); M. Berg and P. Hudson, 'Rehabilitating the Industrial Revolution', EcHR, 2nd ser., vol. 45 (1992), p. 34.
   Google Scholar
• G.R. Hawke, 'Reinterpretations of the Industrial Revolution', in The Industrial Revolution and British Society, eds P.K. O'Brien and R. Quinault (Cambridge, 1993), p. 60.
   Google Scholar
• P. Mathias and J.A. Davis, 'Editors' Introduction', in Innovation and Technology in Europe: fromthe Eighteenth Century to the Present Day, eds P. Mathias and J.A. Davis (Oxford, 1991), pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• E.J. Hobsbawm, Industry and Empire: From 1750 to the Present Day (Harmondsworth, 1969), pp. 13–20; M. Adas, 'Introduction', in Technology and European Overseas Enterprise, ed. E.J. Hobsbawm (London, 1996), pp. xv—xxvi.
   Google Scholar
• L.St.L. Pendred, op. cit. (4), p. 7; L.J. Colley, Captives: Britain, Empire and the World, 1600–1850 (London, 2002), pp. 367–68.
   Google Scholar
• D.R. Headrick, 'The Tools of Imperialism: Technology and the Expansion of European Colonial Empires in the Nineteenth Century', Journal of Modern History, vol. 51 (1979), pp. 231–34.
   Google Scholar
• D.R. Headrick, The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century (Oxford, 1981), pp. 17–57; idem, 'Tools of Imperialism', p.260; pp. 83–114; H. Strachan, European Armies and the Conduct of War (London, 1983), pp. 76–89; M. Crowder, 'West African Resistance', in West African Resistance: The Military Response to Colonial Occupation, ed. H. Strachan (London, 1971), pp. 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• W. Woodruff, Impact of Western Man: A Study of Europe's Role in the World Economy, 1750–1960 (London, 1966), pp. 223–50.
   Google Scholar
• D.R. Headrick, op. cit. (43), pp. 129–56, 165–79; C.E. Lee, op. cit. (5), pp. 119–26; R.A. Buchanan, 'The Overseas Projects of I.K. Brunel', TNS, vol. 54(1982–83), pp. 156–60.
   Google Scholar
• C.W. Smith and M. Norton Wise, Energy and Empire: A Biographical Study of Lord Kelvin (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 649–83; D.R. Headrick, The Tentacles of Progress: Technology Transfer in the Age of Imperialism, 1850–1940 (Oxford, 1988), pp. 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• J. Morris, Pax Britannica: The Climax of an Empire (London, 1968), p. 361; D.R. Headrick, op. cit. (43), pp. 49–96.
   Google Scholar
• D.R. Headrick, op. cit. (46), pp. 145–208,259–303.
   Google Scholar
• J. Morris, Farewell the Trumpets: An Imperial Retreat (London, 1978), pp. 338–62; R.G. Irving, Indian Summer: Lutyens, Baker and Imperial Delhi (London, 1981), pp. 194–95.
   Google Scholar
• J. Darwin, Britain, Egypt and the Middle East: Imperial Policy in the Aftermath of War (London, 1981), pp. 219, 228–29; M. Gilbert, Winston S. Churchill, vol. 4, 1916–22 (London, 1975), pp. 490–97, 796-819; H. Probert, Bomber Harris (London, 2001), pp. 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• A.G. Frank, On Capitalist Underdevelopment (Bombay, 1975); F. Stewart, Technology and Underdevelopment (London, 1977); S. Hill, The Tragedy of Technology (London, 1988); M. Adas, Machines as the Measure of Men: Science, Technology, and Ideologies of Western Dominance (London, 1989).
   Google Scholar
• J. Simmons, op. cit. (18), pp. 2–4; J. Schneer, London, 1900: Imperial Metropolis (London, 1999), pp. 184–226.
   Google Scholar
• P.M. Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict from 1500 to 2000 (London, 1988), p. 202.
   Google Scholar
• D. Cannadine, Ornamentalism: How the British Saw their Empire (London, 2001), esp. pp. 121–35.
   Google Scholar
• P.M. Kennedy, op. cit. (53), pp. 290–99; E.J. Hobsbawm, op. cit. (40), pp. 134–53, 172–94; D. Landes, op. cit. (31), pp. 326–58.
   Google Scholar
• D. Cannadine, In Churchill's Shadow: Confronting the Past in Modern Britain (London, 1902), pp. 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• S.B. Hamilton, op. cit. (5), p. 193.
   Google Scholar
• C.P. Snow, The Two Cultures, intro. S. CoRini (Cambridge, 1998), p. 11; H. Wilson, Purpose in Politics: Selected Speeches (London, 1964), p. 27; B. Pimlott, Harold Wilson (London, 1992), pp. 301–05; P. Ziegler, Wilson: The Authorised Life of Lord Wilson of Rievaulx (London, 1993), pp. 143–44.
   Google Scholar
• C. Barnett, The Swordbearers (London, 1963); The Collapse of British Power (London, 1972); The Audit of War (London, 1986).
   Google Scholar
• D. Cannadine, op. cit. (56), pp. 37–41. See also J. Walvin, Victorian Values (London, 1987); Victorian Values, Proceedings of the British Academy, ed. T.C. Smout, lxxviii (1992).
   Google Scholar
• A.R. Hall, op. cit. (11), pp. 205–09; H.S. Torrens, op. cit. (11), pp. 223–32.
   Google Scholar
• D.H. Aldcroft, 'The Entrepreneur and the British Economy, 1870-1914', EcHR, 2nd. ser., vol. 18 (1964), pp. 113–34; A.L. Levine, Industrial Retardation in Britain, 1880–1914 (London, 1967); The Development of the British Economy and Foreign Competition, 1875–1914, ed. D.H. Aldcroft (London, 1968); D.H. Aldcroft and H.W. Richardson, The British Economy, 1870–1939 (London, 1969).
   Google Scholar
• D.N. McCloskey, Economic Maturity and Entrepreneurial Decline: British Iron and Steel, 1870–1913 (Cambridge, MA, 1973); idem, Enterprise and Trade in Victorian Britain (London, 1981); L.G. Sandberg, 'The Entrepreneur and Technological Change', in The Economic History of Britain since 1700, eds R. Floud and D. McCloskey, 2 vols (Cambridge, 1981), pp. 99–120.
   Google Scholar
• M. Sanderson, The Universities and British Industry, 1850–1970 (London, 1972), esp. pp. 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• D. Edgerton, 'The "White Heat" Revisited: The British Government and Technology in the 1960s', Twentieth-Century British History, vol. 7 (1996), pp. 53–82; J. Tomlinson, 'Inventing "Decline": The Falling Behind of the British Economy in the Post-War Years', EcHR, 2nd ser., vol. 49 (1996), pp. 731–57; idem, 'The British "Productivity" Problem in the 1960s', Past & Present, no. 175 (2002), pp. 188–210.
   Google Scholar
• E. Ashby, Technology and the Academics (London, 1958), pp. 50–66, 75-88.
   Google Scholar
• W.H. Chaloner, op. cit. (5), pp. 211–18. For further critiques of (respectively) Weiner and Barnett, see: J. Raven, 'Viewpoint: British History and the Enterprise Culture', Past & Present, no. 123 (1989), pp. 178–204; J. Harris, 'Enterprise and the Welfare States: A Comparative Perspective', Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th ser., vol. 40 (1990), pp. 183–91.
   Google Scholar
• For a persuasive and provocative general survey, see D. Edgerton, Science, Technology and British Industrial 'Decline', 1870–1970 (Cambridge, 1996). See also British Culture and Economic Decline, eds B. Collins and K. Robbins (London, 1990); F.M.L. Thompson, Gentrification and the Enterprise Culture: Britain, 1780–1980 (Oxford, 2001), esp. pp. 1–22,143-62.
   Google Scholar
• C. Singer, op. cit. (2), p. 132.
   Google Scholar
• M.J. Daunton, Progress and Poverty: An Economic and Social History of Britain, 1700–1850 (Oxford, 1995), p. 127.
   Google Scholar
• D. Edgerton, op. cit. (68), pp. 3, 69.
   Google Scholar
• L.St.L. Pendred, op. cit. (3), p. 9.
   Google Scholar