Assessing the Impact of Migraine

References

• Breslau N, Rasmussen BK. The impact of migraine: epidemiology, risk factors, and co-morbidities. Neurology 2001;56(Suppl 1):S4–S12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Micieli G. Suffering in silence. In: Edmeads J (Ed.): Migraine: A Brighter Future. Worthing: Cambridge Medical Publications, 1993; pp.1–12
   Google Scholar
• Osterhaus JT, Townsend RJ, Gandek B et al. Measuring the functional status and well-being of patients with migraine headache. Headache 1994;34:337–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart WF, Shechter A, Lipton RB. Migraine heterogeneity. Disability, pain intensity, and attack frequency and duration. Neurology 1994;44(Suppl 4):S24–S39
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Liberman J et al. Patterns of health-care utilization for migraine in England. Cephalalgia 1999;19:305 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Stang PE, Von Korff M. The diagnosis of headache in primary care: factors in the agreement of clinical and standardized diagnoses. Headache 1994;34:138–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard A, Massiou H, Herrmann MA. Frequency and profile of migraine patients seen by general practitioners. Semin Hop Paris 1999;75:440–6
   Google Scholar
• Edmeads J, Láinez JM, Brandes JL et al. Potential of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire as a public health initiative and in clinical practice. Neurology 2001;56(Suppl 1):S29–S34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dowson A, Jagger S. The UK migraine patient survey: quality of life and treatment. Curr Med Res Opin 1999;15(4):241–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton RB, Stewart WF. Acute migraine therapy: do doctors understand what migraine patients want from therapy? Headache 1999;39(Suppl 2):20–6
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Sciences/Institute of Medicine (NAS/IOM). Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington DC: NAS Press, 1991
   Google Scholar
• Edmeads J, Findlay H, Tugwell P et al. Impact of migraine and tension-type headache on life-style, consulting behaviour, and medication use: a Canadian population survey. Can J Neurol Sci 1993;20:131–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai F, Igarashi H. Epidemiology of migraine in Japan. Cephalalgia 1997;17:15–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke CE, MacMillan L, Sondhi S et al. Economic and social impact of migraine. Q J Med 1996;89:77–84
   Google Scholar
• Von Korff M, Stewart WF, Simon DJ et al. Migraine and reduced work performance: a population-based diary study. Neurology 1998;50:1741–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Korff M, Ormel J, Keefe FJ et al. Grading the severity of chronic pain. Pain 1992;50:133–49
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Arefeh I, Russell G. Prevalence of headache and migraine in schoolchildren. BMJ 1994;309:765–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osterhaus J. The hidden consequences of migraine. In: Edmeads J (Ed.), Migraine: A Brighter Future. Worthing: Cambridge Medical Publications, 1993; pp.21–7
   Google Scholar
• Office of Health Economics. Compendium of Health Statistics. London: OHE, 1989
   Google Scholar
• Smith RC. Impact of migraine on the family. Headache 1996;36:278 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Kryst S, Scherl ER. Social and personal impact of headache in Kentucky. In: Olesen J (Ed.), Headache Classification and Epidemiology. New York: Raven Press Ltd, 1994; pp.345–50
   Google Scholar
• de Lissovoy G, Lazarus SS. The economic cost of migraine. Present state of knowledge. Neurology 1994;44(Suppl 4):56–62
   Google Scholar
• Von Korff MR, Stang PE. Prediction of the psychosocial and behavioral outcomes of headache. In: Olesen J (Ed.), Headache Classification and Epidemiology. New York: Raven Press, 1994; pp.367–71
   Google Scholar
• Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Simon D et al. Reliability of an illness severity measure for headache in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Cephalalgia 1998;18:44–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Simon D et al. Validity of an illness severity measure in a population sample of migraine headache sufferers. Pain 1999;79:291–301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner K et al. Reliability of the migraine disability assessment score in a population-based sample of headache sufferers. Cephalalgia 1999;19:107–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Whyte J et al. An international study to assess reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score. Neurology 1999;53:988–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Kolodner KB et al. Validity of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score in comparison to a diary-based measure in a population sample of migraine sufferers. Pain 2000;88:41–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart WF, Lipton RB, Dowson AJ et al. Development and testing of the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire to assess headache-related disability. Neurology 2001;56(Suppl 1):S20–S28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holmes WF, MacGregor EA, Sawyer JPC et al. Information about migraine disability influences physicians’ perceptions of illness severity and treatment needs. Headache 2001;41:343–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathew NT, Villareal S, Kailasam J. Improvement in headache related disability in chronic daily headache-treatment outcome assessed by MIDAS. Headache 2000;40:420 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Freitag F, Diamond S, Lyss H et al. MIDAS as a healthcare utilization tool in the challenging patient. Cephalalgia 2000;20:365 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Bjorner JB, Kosinski M. Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing. Med Care 2000;38:S73–S82
   Google Scholar
• Lipton RB, Sheftell F, Stewart WF et al. The MIDAS perception study: headache characteristics and treatment at low MIDAS grades. Cephalalgia 2001;21:326–7 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Lipton RB, Stewart WF, Stone AM et al. Stratified care vs step care strategies for migraine: results of the Disability in Strategies of Care (DISC) Study. JAMA 2000;284:2599–605
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Headache Impact Test (HIT). www.amIhealthy.com
   Google Scholar
• Tepper S, Dahlof C, Sheftell F et al. Impact of migraine relative to other headache types. Cephalalgia 2001;21:331–2 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Diamond M, Cady R, Dewey J et al. The internet-delivered dynamic headache impact test (HIT™): profile of the first 19 000+ respondents. Cephalalgia 2001;21:332 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Dowson A, Diamond M, Pryse-Phillips W et al. Health care-seeking behaviour of respondents after taking the headache impact test (HIT™). Cephalalgia 2001;21:332–3 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Kosinski M, Bjorner JB, Dahlof C et al. Development of HIT-6, a paper-based short form for measuring headache impact. Cephalalgia 2001;21:334 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Garber WH, Kosinski M, Dahlof C et al. HIT-6 reliably measures the impact of headache. Cephalalgia 2001;21:333 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Ware J, Kosinski M, Dahlof C et al. Validity of HIT-6, a paper-based short form for measuring headache impact. Cephalalgia 2001;21:333 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Bayliss MS, Kosinski M, Diamond M et al. HIT-6 scores discriminate among headache sufferers differing in headache-associated workplace productivity loss. Cephalalgia 2001;21:333–4 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Dahlof C, Tepper S, Pryse-Phillips W et al. Comparability of scores on the Headache Impact Test™ (HIT) and HIT-6™. Cephalalgia 2001;21:334–5 (Abstract)
   Google Scholar
• Dowson AJ, Gruffydd-Jones K, Hackett G et al. Migraine Management Guidelines. London: Synergy Medical Education, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Matchar DB, Young WB, Rosenberg JH et al. Multispecialty consensus on diagnosis and treatment of headache: pharmacological management of acute attacks. Neurology 2000;54: www.aan.com/public/practiceguidelines/03.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lipton RB, Silberstein SD. The role of headache-related disability in migraine management. Neurology 2001;56(Suppl 1):S35–S42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bedell AW, Cady RK, Diamond ML et al. Patient-centered strategies for effective management of migraine. Springfield: Primary Care Network, 2000
   Google Scholar
• Dowson AJ. A survey assessing general practitioners’ perceptions of the impact of migraine in the UK. (In preparation)
   Google Scholar
• Steiner TJ, MacGregor EA, Davies PTG. Guidelines for all doctors in the diagnosis and management of migraine and tension-type headache. British Association for the Study of Headache 2000; www.bash.org.uk
   Google Scholar
• Lewis TA, Solomon GD. Advances in migraine management. Cleveland Clin J Med 1995;62:148–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener HC, Brune K, Gerber WD et al. Therapy of acute migraine attacks and migraine prophylaxis – guidelines of the German Migraine and Headache Society [in German]. Nervenheilkunde 1997;16:500–10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar