References
- Jacobs A. The involvement of professional medical writers in medical publications: results of a Delphi study. Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21(2):311–6
- International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. http://www.icmje.org [last accessed 13 January 2005]
- Wager E, Field EA, Grossman L. Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companies. Curr Med Res Opin 2003;19(3):149–54. Also available from http://www.gpp-guidelines.org [last accessed 13 January 2005]
- CONSORT statement. http://www.consort-statement.org [last accessed 13 January 2005]
- ISRCTN. http://www.controlled-trials.com [last accessed 13 January 2005]
- Angell M. The pharmaceutical industry – to whom is it accountable? New Engl J Med 2000;342:1902–4
- Anon. Ghost with a chance in publishing undergrowth. Lancet 1993;342:1498–9
- Anon. The tightening grip of big pharma. Lancet 2001;357:1141
- Bodenheimer T. Uneasy alliance. Clinical investigators and the pharmaceutical industry. New Engl J Med 2000;342:1539–44
- Davidoff F, DeAngelis CD, Drazen JM, et al. Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability. Ann Intern Med 2001;135:463–6 [also Lancet 358:854–6]
- Horton R. Signing up for authorship. Lancet 1996;347:780
- Horton R. The unmasked carnival of science. Lancet 1998;351:688–9
- Huston P, Moher D. Redundancy, disaggregation, and the integrity of medical research. Lancet 1996;347:1024–6
- Lagnado M. Haunted papers. Lancet 2002;359:902
- Rennie D. Conflicts of interest in the publication of science. J Am Med Assoc 1991;266:266–7
- Rennie D, Flanagin A. Authorship! Authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters and the two-sided coin. J Am Med Assoc 1994;271:469–71
- Rennie D. When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable. J Am Med Assoc 1997;278:579–85
- Rennie D. Thyroid storm. J Am Med Assoc 1997;277:1238–43
- Rennie D, Flanagin A, Yank V. The contributions of authors. J Am Med Assoc 2000;284:89–91
- Sharp D. A ghostly crew. Lancet 1998;351:1076
- Smith R. Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record. Br Med J 2001;323:588