260
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Letter to the Editor

Comments on Long-term clinical and cost outcomes of treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 versus insulin glargine in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients: cost-effectiveness analysis in the UK setting

, , , , , , , & show all
Pages 967-969 | Accepted 24 Mar 2006, Published online: 19 Apr 2006

References

  • Davidson MB. Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients: does it really matter how? Diabetes Care 2005;28: 494–5
  • Mikhail NE, Cope D. Initiation of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes failing oral therapy: response to Raskin et al. and Janka et al. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1537–8
  • Raskin P. Initiation of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes failing oral therapy: response to Mikhail and Cope and to Janka. Diabetes Care 2005;28:2811
  • Raskin P, Allen E, Hollander P et al. Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of biphasic and basal insulin analogs. Diabetes Care 2005; 28:260–65
  • National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Technology Appraisal Guidance – No. 53. Guidance on the use of long-acting insulin analogues for the treatment of diabetes – insulin glargine. London: NICE, 2002
  • Palmer AJ, Roze S, Valentine WJ, et al. The CORE Diabetes Model: projecting long-term clinical outcomes, costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions in diabetes mellitus (types 1 and 2) to support clinical and reimbursement decision-making. Curr Med Res Opin 2004;20(Suppl 1):5–26
  • Lee AJ, Morgan CL, Morrissey M et al. Evaluation of the association between the EQ-5D (health-related utility) and body mass index (obesity) in hospital-treated people with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes and with no diagnosed diabetes. Diabet Med 2005;22:1482–6
  • Valentine WJ, Palmer AJ, Lammert M, et al. Long-term clinical and cost outcomes of treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 vs insulin glargine in insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients: cost effectiveness analysis in a UK setting. Curr Med Res Opin 2005;21:2063–71
  • The UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998;352:837–53

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.