Patient-controlled analgesia:patient and nurse satisfaction with intravenous delivery systems and expected satisfaction with transdermal delivery systems

References

• Tsui SL, Law S, Fok M, et al. Postoperative analgesia reduces mortality and morbidity after esophagectomy. Am J Surg 1997;173:472–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth 1997;78:606–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebovits AH, Zenetos P, O’Neill DK, et al. Satisfaction with epidural and intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Pain Med 2001;2:280–6
   Google Scholar
• Jamison RN, Ross MJ, Hoopman P, et al. Assessment of postoperative pain management: patient satisfaction and perceived helpfulness. Clin J Pain 1997;13:229–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vila H, Smith RA, Augustyniak MJ, et al. The efficacy and safety of pain management before and after implementation of hospital-wide pain management standards: is patient safety compromised by treatment based solely on numerical pain ratings? Anesth Analg 2005;101:474–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi ER, Schechter LN. Patient-controlled analgesia: finding a balance between cost and comfort. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2006;63:S3–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karci A, Tasdogen A, Erkin Y, et al. Evaluation of quality in patient-controlled analgesia provided by an acute pain service. Eur Surg Res 2003;35:363–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miaskowski C. Patient-controlled modalities for acute postoperative pain management. J Perianesth Nurs 2005;20:255–67
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellino TA, Ward SE. Perceived control mediates the relationship between pain severity and patient satisfaction. J Pain Symp Manag 1998;15:110–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellino TA. Relationships between patient attitudes, subjective norms, perceived control, and analgesic use following elective orthopedic surgery. Res Nurs Health 1997;20:97–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allard J, Carthey J, Cope J, et al. Medication errors: causes, prevention and reduction. Br J Haematol 2002;116:255–65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang AM, Ip WY, Cheung TH. Patient-controlled analgesia versus conventional intramuscular injection: a cost effectiveness analysis. J Adv Nurs 2004;46:531–41
   Google Scholar
• Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) Medication Safety Alert. Safety issues with patient-controlled analgesia Part I – how errors occur. July 10, 2003
   Google Scholar
• Vicente KJ, Kada-Bekhaled K, Hillel G, et al. Programming errors contribute to death from patient-controlled analgesia: case report and estimate of probability. Can J Anesth 2003;50:328–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordin M, Gordon DB, Anastassopoulos KP, et al. Multicenter, prospective, observational study of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV PCA) resource utilization (RU) in acute postoperative pain management. Presented at 2005 Meeting of American Society of Health System Pharmacists, June 11–15, Boston
   Google Scholar
• Lysakowski C, Dumont L, Tramèr MR, et al. A needle-free jet-injection system with lidocaine for peripheral intravenous cannula insertion: a randomized controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis. Anesth Analg 2003;96:215–19
   Google Scholar
• Camu F, Van Aken H, Bovill JG. Postoperative analgesic effects of three demand-dose sizes of fentanyl administered by patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 1998;87:890–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chelly JE, Grass J, Houseman TW, et al. The safety and efficacy of a fentanyl patient-controlled transdermal delivery system for acute postoperative analgesia: a multicenter, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2004;98:427–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi ER, Reynolds L, Chung F, et al. Patient-controlled transdermal fentanyl hydrochloride vs intravenous morphine pump for postoperative pain: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004;291:1333–41
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viscusi ER, Reynolds L, Tait S, et al. An iontophoretic fentanyl patient-activated analgesic delivery system for postoperative pain: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Anesth Analg 2006;102:188–94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron-Epel O, Dushenat M, Friedman N. Evaluation of the consumer model: relationship between patient’s expectations, perceptions and satisfaction with care. Int J Qual Health Care 2001;13:317–23.
   Google Scholar
• Fosnocht DE, Hollifield MB, Swanson ER. Patient preference for route of pain medication delivery. J Emerg Med 2004;26:7–11
   Google Scholar
• Borner MM, Schoffski P, deWit R, et al. Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomized crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2002;38:349–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu G, Franssen E, Fitch MI, et al. Patient preferences for oral versus intravenous palliative chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:110–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heine RJ. Unlocking the opportunity of tight glycaemic control. Promise ahead: the role of inhaled insulin in clinical practice. Diabetes Obes Metab 2005;7:S19–23
   Google Scholar
• Worthington I. Delivery systems for acute migraine medications. Can Fam Physician 2001;47:322–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apkon M, Leonard J, Probst L, et al. Design of a safer approach to intravenous drug infusions: failure mode effects analysis. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:265–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan G, Cooley C. Injection systems for two luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonists: a comparative assessment of administration times and nurses’ perceptions. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2005;9:334–40
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen/NetRatings: Three out of four Americans have access to the internet, according to Nielsen/NetRatings (Press Release). March 18, 2004; http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_040318.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Abramowitz S, Cote AA, Berry E. Analyzing patient satisfaction: a multianalytic approach. QRB Qual Rev Bull 1987;13:122–30
   Google Scholar
• Blanchard CG, Labrecque MS, Ruckdeschel JC, et al. Physician behaviors, patient perceptions, and patient characteristics as predictors of satisfaction of hospitalized adult cancer patients. Cancer 1990;65:186–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmel S. Satisfaction with hospitalization: a comparative analysis of three types of services. Soc Sci Med 1985;21:1243–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry 1988;25:25–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamison RN, Taft K, O’Hara JP, et al. Psychosocial and pharmacologic predictors of satisfaction with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 1993;77:121–5
   Google Scholar
• Ward SE, Gordon DB. Patient satisfaction and pain severity as outcomes in pain management: a longitudinal view of one setting’s experience. J Pain Symptom Manage 1996;11:242–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar