References
- Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014;64:9-29
- Stehman FB, Look KY. Carcinoma of the vulva. Obstet Gynecol 2006;107:719-33
- Hacker NF, Eifel PJ, van der Velden J. Cancer of the vulva. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015;131(Suppl 2):S76-S83
- Li J, Cai Y, Ke G, et al. Validation of the new FIGO staging system (2009) for vulvar cancer in the Chinese population. Gynecol Oncol 2015;137:274-9
- Fons G, Hyde SE, Buist MR, et al. Prognostic value of bilateral positive nodes in squamous cell cancer of the vulva. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009;19:1276-80
- Hacker NF. Vulvar cancer. In: Berek JS, Hacker NF, editors. Berek & Hacker’s Gynecologic Oncology, 5th edn. Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkins, 2010:576-92
- de Hullu JA, van der Zee AG. Surgery and radiotherapy in vulvar cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2006;60:38-58
- Hauspy J, Beiner M, Harley I, et al. Sentinel lymph node in vulvar cancer. Cancer 2007;110:1015-23
- Xu LQ, Luo RZ, Sun XM, et al. Prognostic analysis of early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. World J Surg Oncol 2013;11:20
- Woelber L, Mahner S, Voelker K, et al. Clinicopathological prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence in vulvar cancer. Anticancer Res 2009;29:545-52
- Baiocchi G, Cestari FM, Rocha RM, et al. Does the count after inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in vulvar cancer correlate with outcome? Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:339-43
- Konidaris S, Bakas P, Gregoriou O, et al. Surgical management of invasive carcinoma of the vulva. A retrospective analysis and review. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2011;32:505-8
- Forner DM, Lampe B. Exenteration in the treatment of stage III/IV vulvar cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2012;124:87-91
- Sutton AJ, Barton P, Sundar S, et al. Cost-effectiveness of sentinel lymph node biopsy vs inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy in women with vulval cancer. Br J Cancer 2013;109:2533-47
- Vidal-Sicart S, Puig-Tintore LM, Lejarcegui JA, et al. Validation and application of the sentinel lymph node concept in malignant vulvar tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007;34:384-91
- Brammen L, Staudenherz A, Polterauer S, et al. Sentinel lymph node detection in vulvar cancer patients: a 20 years analysis. Hell J Nucl Med 2014;17:184-9
- FIGO Committee on Gynecological Oncology. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009;105:103-4
- Hacker NF. Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2009;105:105-6
- Odicino F, Pecorelli S, Zigliani L, Creasman WT. History of the FIGO cancer staging system. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2008;101:205-10
- Tabbaa ZM, Gonzalez J, Sznurkowski JJ, et al. Impact of the new FIGO 2009 staging classification for vulvar cancer on prognosis and stage distribution. Gynecol Oncol 2012;127:147-52
- Tan J, Chetty N, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, et al. Validation of the FIGO 2009 staging system for carcinoma of the vulva. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012;22:498-502
- van der Steen S, de Nieuwenhof HP, Massuger L, et al. New FIGO staging system of vulvar cancer indeed provides a better reflection of prognosis. Gynecol Oncol 2010;119:520-5
- Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:W65-94
- Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al.; QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:529-36
- Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Schmid CH. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 1997;127:820-6
- Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539-58
- DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-88
- Baiocchi G, Silva Cestari FM, Rocha RM, et al. Prognostic value of the number and laterality of metastatic inguinal lymph nodes in vulvar cancer: revisiting the FIGO staging system. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013;39:780-5
- Sznurkowski JJ, Milczek T, Emerich J. Prognostic factors and a value of 2009 FIGO staging system in vulvar cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2013;287:1211-18
- Stankevica J, Macuks R, Baidekalna I, Donina S. Midline involvement as a risk factor for vulvar cancer recurrence. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:5237-40
- Sun X, Zhang Y, Sun J, et al. The comparative study of former and latest FIGO staging of vulva cancer. Minerva Chir 2012;67:187-95
- Woelber L, Eulenburg C, Choschzick M, et al. Prognostic role of lymph node metastases in vulvar cancer and implications for adjuvant treatment. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2012;22:503-8
- Sharma DN, Rath GK, Kumar S, et al. Treatment outcome of patients with carcinoma of vulva: experience from a tertiary cancer center of India. J Cancer Res Ther 2010;6:503-7
- Tantipalakorn C, Robertson G, Marsden DE, et al. Outcome and patterns of recurrence for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages I and II squamous cell vulvar cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2009;113:895-901
- Gadducci A, Tana R, Barsotti C, et al. Clinico-pathological and biological prognostic variables in squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2012;83:71-83
- Panici PB, Tomao F, Domenici L, et al. Prognostic role of inguinal lymphadenectomy in vulvar squamous carcinoma: younger and older patients should be equally treated. A prospective study and literature review. Gynecol Oncol 2015;137:373-9