A double-blind comparison of meptazinol versus placebo in chronic rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis

References

• Beecher H. K. The powerful placebo. J.A.M.A. 1955; 155: 16021. Beecher H. K. The powerful placebo. J.A.M.A. 1955; 155: 1602
   Google Scholar
• Beecher H. K., Keaths A. S., Mosteller F., Lasagna L. The effectiveness of oral analgesics (morphine, codeine and acetylsalicylic acid) and the problem of placebo 'reactors' and 'non-reactors'. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1953; 109: 3932. Beecher H. K., Keaths A. S., Mosteller F., Lasagna L. The effectiveness of oral analgesics (morphine, codeine and acetylsalicylic acid) and the problem of placebo 'reactors' and 'non-reactors'. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1953; 109: 393
   Google Scholar
• Cooper S. A. Double-blind comparison of zomepirac sodium, propoxyphene/acetaminophen and placebo in the treatment of oral surgical pain. Curr. Ther. Res. 1980; 28: 6303. Cooper S. A. Double-blind comparison of zomepirac sodium, propoxyphene/acetaminophen and placebo in the treatment of oral surgical pain. Curr. Ther. Res. 1980; 28: 630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell-Matts S. G. Dextromaramide analgesia in the acute general medical patient. Practitioner 1962; 188: 5244. Flavell-Matts S. G. Dextromaramide analgesia in the acute general medical patient. Practitioner 1962; 188: 524
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flavell-Matts S. G. A comparable trial of Solpadeine with Tabs codeine co. soluble B.P. Clin. Trials J. 1969; 6: 1035. Flavell-Matts S. G. A comparable trial of Solpadeine with Tabs codeine co. soluble B.P. Clin. Trials J. 1969; 6: 103
   Google Scholar
• Flavell-Matts S. G. A double-blind comparison of pentazocine-paracetamol and dextropropoxyphene-paracetamol compound tablets. J. Int. Med. Res. 1972; 1: 266. Flavell-Matts S. G. A double-blind comparison of pentazocine-paracetamol and dextropropoxyphene-paracetamol compound tablets. J. Int. Med. Res. 1972; 1: 26
   Google Scholar
• Flavell-Matts S. G. Chronic rheumatic disease. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 1973; 27: 817. Flavell-Matts S. G. Chronic rheumatic disease. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 1973; 27: 81
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flavell-Matts S. G. Analgesics. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 1973; 27: 3598. Flavell-Matts S. G. Analgesics. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 1973; 27: 359
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flavell-Matts S. G., Ward P. R. A double-blind comparison of meptazinol versus pentazocine in chronic rheumatoid and osteoarthritis. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 1980; 34: 2869. Flavell-Matts S. G., Ward P. R. A double-blind comparison of meptazinol versus pentazocine in chronic rheumatoid and osteoarthritis. Br. J. Clin. Pract. 1980; 34: 286
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstuck N. D., Ward P. J. Treatment of pain following I.U.D. insertion with meptazinol — a new centrally acting analgesic. Contracept. Deliv. Syst. 1983; 4: 3310. Goldstuck N. D., Ward P. J. Treatment of pain following I.U.D. insertion with meptazinol — a new centrally acting analgesic. Contracept. Deliv. Syst. 1983; 4: 33
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kangilaski J. Beta-endorphin levels lower in arthritis patients. J.A.M.A. 1981; 246: 20311. Kangilaski J. Beta-endorphin levels lower in arthritis patients. J.A.M.A. 1981; 246: 203
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lasagna L., Mosteller E., Von Felsinger J. M., Beecher H. K. A study of the placebo response. Am. J. Med. 1954; 16: 77012. Lasagna L., Mosteller E., Von Felsinger J. M., Beecher H. K. A study of the placebo response. Am. J. Med. 1954; 16: 770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littlejohns D. W., Vere D. W. The clinical assessment of analgesic drugs. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol 1981; 11: 31913. Littlejohns D. W., Vere D. W. The clinical assessment of analgesic drugs. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol 1981; 11: 319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray W. J. Evaluation of aspirin in treatment of headache. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1964; 5: 2114. Murray W. J. Evaluation of aspirin in treatment of headache. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 1964; 5: 21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price R. K. J., Latham A. N. Double-blind comparison of meptazinol (200 mg) and dextropropoxyphene/paracetamol in a multi-centre, general practice setting. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 1982; 8: 5415. Price R. K. J., Latham A. N. Double-blind comparison of meptazinol (200 mg) and dextropropoxyphene/paracetamol in a multi-centre, general practice setting. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 1982; 8: 54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price R. K. J., Latham A. N. Long term assessment of the efficacy and safety of oral meptazinol (200 mg) in general practice. Curr. Ther. Res. 1982; 31: 80716. Price R. K. J., Latham A. N. Long term assessment of the efficacy and safety of oral meptazinol (200 mg) in general practice. Curr. Ther. Res. 1982; 31: 807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price R. K. J., Latham A. N. Meptazinol: a side-effect profile compared to placebo in general practice. J. Int. Med. Res. 1982; 10: 21917. Price R. K. J., Latham A. N. Meptazinol: a side-effect profile compared to placebo in general practice. J. Int. Med. Res. 1982; 10: 219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price R. K. J., Latham A. N. Pain type and sex-dependent responses to a placebo controlled multi-centre analgesic trial. Clin. Trials J. 1982; 19: 10718. Price R. K. J., Latham A. N. Pain type and sex-dependent responses to a placebo controlled multi-centre analgesic trial. Clin. Trials J. 1982; 19: 107
   Google Scholar
• Schindel L. The placebo dilemma. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1978; 13: 23119. Schindel L. The placebo dilemma. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1978; 13: 231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhaus J. E., Bevan W., Webb S. C., Thompson W. R. Evaluation of analgesics by the rating of patient behaviour. Anesthesiology 1964; 25: 6420. Steinhaus J. E., Bevan W., Webb S. C., Thompson W. R. Evaluation of analgesics by the rating of patient behaviour. Anesthesiology 1964; 25: 64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade A. G., Ward P. J. First impressions of the use of meptazinol in general practice. J. Int. Med. Res. 1981; 9: 7421. Wade A. G., Ward P. J. First impressions of the use of meptazinol in general practice. J. Int. Med. Res. 1981; 9: 74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward P. J. Double-blind comparison of meptazinol versus pentazocine in patients with chronic backache. Curr. Ther. Res. 1981; 30: 50722. Ward P. J. Double-blind comparison of meptazinol versus pentazocine in patients with chronic backache. Curr. Ther. Res. 1981; 30: 507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallenstein S. L., Heidrich G., Kaiko R., Houde R. W. Clinical evaluation of mild analgesics: the measurement of clinical pain. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1980; 10: 31923. Wallenstein S. L., Heidrich G., Kaiko R., Houde R. W. Clinical evaluation of mild analgesics: the measurement of clinical pain. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1980; 10: 319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar