Perceived Combat Readiness as Collective Efficacy: Individual- and Group-Level Analysis

REFERENCES

• Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., Murry, W., & Suvasubramaniam, N. (1996). Building highly developed teams: Focusing on shared leadership processes, efficacy, trust, and performance. In Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (Vol. 3, pp. 173–209). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social-cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bartone, P., & Kirkland, F. R. (1991). Optimal leadership in small army units. In R. Gal & A. D. Mangelsdorff (Eds.), Handbook of military psychology (pp. 393–409). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Baynes, J. C. (1967). Morale. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, D. (1990). Pygmalion in management: Productivity as a self-fulfilling prophecy. Lexington, MA: Lexington.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, R. (1986). Unit morale: Fromatheoretical puzzle to an empirical illustration—An Israeli example. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 549–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, R., & Manning, F. J. (1987). Morale and its components: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 369–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, J. M., & James, L. R. (1993). Personality, affect and behavior in groups revisited: Comment on aggregation, levels of analysis, and a recent application of within and between analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 798–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, J. (1988). Measurement of group cohesion in U. S. Army units. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 149–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, J. (1995). An experimental examination of a model of social climate in elementary schools. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinker, R. R., & Spiegel, J. P. (1945). Men under stress. Philadelphia: Blakiston.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo, R. A., Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potencyin groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. J., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. J., & Wolf, G. (1992). Rwg: An assessment of interrater agreement. Journalof Applied Psychology, 78, 306–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Hattrup, K. (1992). A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, F. J. (1991). Morale, cohesion and esprit de corps. In R. Gal & A. D. Mangelsdorff (Eds.), Handbook of military psychology (pp. 453–470). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, C., & Chatman, J. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 492–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prussia, G. E., & Kinicki, A. J. (1996). A motivational investigation of group effectiveness using social-cognitive theory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 187–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, M. L., & Knight, P. A. (1994). The impact of perceived group success-failure on motivational beliefs and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 755–766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau, D. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multilevel and cross-level perspectives. In L. L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 1–37). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Schriesheim, C. A., Cogliser, C. C., & Neider, L. L. (1995). Is it “trustworthy”? A multiple-levels-of-analysis reexamination of an Ohio State leadership study, with implications for future research. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 111–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, B. (1990). Calculations, values and identities: The sources of collectivistic work motivation. Human Relations, 43, 313–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization Science, 4, 577–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibutani, T. I. (1978). The derelicts of Company K: A sociological study of demoralization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shils, E. A., & Janowitz, M. (1948). Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12, 280–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver, W. S., & Bufanio, K. M. (1996). The impact of group efficacy and group goals on group task performance. Small Group Research, 27, 347–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 89–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1985). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed., pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A. S. (1994). Reputational effectiveness: Toward a mutual responsiveness framework. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 16, pp. 257–307). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
   Google Scholar
• Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar