REFERENCES
- Brill, L. M. (1999, July). Virtual reality. Funworld, 15(7), 54–62.
- Burdea, G., & Coiffet, P. (1994). Virtual reality technology. New York: Wiley.
- Committee on Ship Bridge Simulation Training, Marine Board, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems, National Research Council. (1995). Simulated voyages: Using simulation technology to train and license mariners. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Cook, N. (1994). VR: Even better than the real thing. Jane’s Defense Weekly, 21(8), 24–25.
- Doctrine for submarine interior communications. (1995). ( Rep. No. COMSUBLANT/COMSUB-PACINST 2305.1D CH–1 N461/N402A).Norfolk, VA, and Pearl Harbor, HI: Commander Submarine Force United States Atlantic and Pacific Fleet.
- Fowlkes, J., Dwyer, D. J., Oser, R. L., & Salas, E. (1998). Event-based approach to training. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 8, 209–221.
- Gradecki, J. (1994, May–June). Virtual reality arcade systems. PCVR Magazine, 15, pp. 5–8.
- Hammell, T. J., Williams, K. E., Grasso, J. A., & Evans, W. (1980). Simulators for mariner training and licensing phase I: The role of simulators in the mariner training and licensing process ( Vols. 1–2, Rep. No. CAORF 50–78101–01). Kings Point, NY: National Maritime Research Center.
- Hays, R. T., Seamon, A. G., & Bradley, S. K. (1997). Useroriented design analysis of the VESUB technology demonstration system ( Rep. No. NAWCTSD TR 97–013). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division. ( DTIC No. ADA 332 570)
- Hays, R. T., Vincenzi, D. A., Seamon, A. G., & Bradley, S. K. (1998). Training effectiveness evaluation of the VESUB technology demonstration system (Rep. No. NAWCTSD TR 98–003). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division. ( DTIC No. ADA 349 219)
- Kalansky, R. S. (1993). The science of virtual reality and virtual environments. Reading, MA: Addi-son-Wesley.
- Knerr, B. W., Goldberg, S. L., Lampton, D. R., Witmer, B. G., Bliss, J. P., Moshell, J. M., & Blau, B. S. (1994). Research in the use of virtual environment technology to train dismounted soldiers. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 6(4), 9–20.
- Lampton, D. R., Knerr, B. W., Goldberg, S. L., Bliss, J. P., Moshell, J. M., & Blau, B. S.(1994). The Virtual Environment Performance Assessment Battery (VEPAB): Development and evaluation. Presence, 3, 145–157.
- Magee, L. E.(1997). Virtual reality simulator (VRS) for training ship handling skills. In R. J. Seidel & P. R. Chatelier (Eds.), Virtual reality, training’s future? Perspectives on virtual reality and related emerging technologies (pp. 19–29). New York: Plenum.
- Null, C. H., & Jenkins, J. P. (1993). NASA virtual environment research, applications, and technology. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
- Rheingold, H. (1991). Virtual reality. New York: Simon Schuster.
- Tenney, Y. J., Briscoe, H., Pew, R. W., Bradley, S. K., Seamon, A. G., & Hays, R. T. (1996).Virtual environment submarine officer of the deck simulation and training: Preliminary requirements recommendation ( Rep. No. NAWCTSD SR 96–002). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division.
- U.S. Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard. (1990). Navigation rules: International–inland ( Commandant Instruction No. M16672.2B). Washington, DC: Commandant, United States Coast Guard.