202
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Identifying Motivation and Interpersonal Performance Using Peer Evaluations

, &
Pages 73-88 | Published online: 17 Nov 2009

REFERENCES

  • Amir, Y., Kovarsky, Y., & Sharan, S. (1970). Peer nominations as a predictor of multistage promotions in a ramified organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 462–469.
  • Borman, W. C. (1974). The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 105–124.
  • Borman, W. C., White, L. A., & Dorsey, D. W. (1995). Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 168–177.
  • Downey, R. G., Medland, F. F., & Yates, L. G. (1976). Evaluation of a peer rating system for predicting subsequent promotion of senior military officers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 206–209.
  • Dugan, R. D. (1953). Comparison of evaluation of B-29 crews in training and in combat. American Psychologist, 8, 343–344.
  • Gordon, L. V., & Medland, F. F. (1964). The cross group stability of peer ratings of leadership potential. Personnel Psychology, 18, 173–178.
  • Green, P. E. (1978). Analyzing multivariate data. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden.
  • Hollander, E. P. (1956). Interpersonal exposure timeasadeterminant of the predictive utility of peer ratings. Psychological Reports, 2, 445–448.
  • Hollander, E. P. (1957). The reliability of peer nominations under various conditions of administration. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 85–90.
  • Klimoski, R. J., & London, M. (1974). Role of the rater in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 445–451.
  • Knapp, D. J., & Campbell, J. P. (1993). Building ajoint-service classification research roadmap: Criterion-related issues ( Rep. No. AFMC AL/HR–TP–1993–0028). Brooks Air Force Base, TX: Human Resources Directorate Manpower and Personnel Research Division.
  • Kraut, A. I. (1975). Prediction of managerial success by peer and training staff ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 14–19.
  • Love, K. G. (1981). Comparison of peer assessment methods: Reliability, validity, friendship bias, and user reaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 451–457.
  • Mayfield, E. C. (1970). Management selection: Buddy nominations revisited. Personnel Psychology, 23, 377–391.
  • Mumford, M. M. (1983). Social comparison theory and the evaluationofpeer evaluations: Areview and some applied implications. Personnel Psychology, 36, 867–881.
  • Murphy, K. R., & Cleveland, J. N. (1991). Performance appraisal. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • O'Connor, W. F., & Berkshire, J. R. (1958). Comparison of the pre-flight OLQ grade and the leadership peer rating as predictors of training failure ( Rep. No. 58–16). Pensacola, FL: U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine.
  • Oppler, S. H., Peterson, N. G., & McCloy, R. A. (1994, April). A comparison of peer supervisor ratings as criteria for the validation of predictors. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.
  • Orpen, C. (1983). Peer ratings as predictors of managerial performance. Psychological Studies, 28, 78–80.
  • Reynolds, H. H. (1966). Efficacy of sociometric ratings in predicting leadership success. Psychological Reports, 19, 35–40.
  • Rothstein, H. R. (1990). Interrater reliabilityofjob performance ratings: Growth toasymptote level with increasing opportunity to observe. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 322–327.
  • Russell, T. L., Crafts, J. L., Tagliareni, F. A., McCloy, R. A., & Barkley, P. (1996). Job analysis of Special Forces jobs ( ARI Research Note 96–76). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
  • Russell, T. L., Rohrback, M. R., Nee, M. T., Crafts, J. L., Peterson, N. G., & Mael, F. A. (1995).Development of a roadmap for Special Forces selection and classification research ( ARI Tech. Rep. No. 1033). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
  • Schumacher, J. E., Scogin, F., Howland, K., & McGee, J. (1992). The relation of peer assessment to future law enforcement performance. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 19, 286–293.
  • Shore, T. H., Shore, L. M., & Thornton, G. C. (1992). Construct validity of self- and peer evaluations of performance dimensions in an assessment center. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 42–54.
  • Wherry, R. J., & Fryer, D. H. (1949). Buddy ratings: Popularity contestorleadership criteria? Personnel Psychology, 2, 147–159.
  • Williams, S. B., & Leavitt, H. J. (1947). Group opinion as a predictor of military leadership. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 11, 283–291.
  • Willingham, W. W. (1959). On deriving standard scores for peer nominations with subgroups of unequal size. Psychological Reports, 5, 397–403.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.