Toward Standardized Measurement of Sexual Harassment: Shortening the SEQ-DoD Using Item Response Theory

REFERENCES

• Arvey, R. D., & Cavanaugh, M. A. (1995). Using surveys to assess the prevalence of sexual harassment: Some methodological problems. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 39–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, F. B. (1992). Item response theory: Parameter estimation techniques. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, L. D., Lancaster, A. R., & Reyst, H. E. (1996). Department of Defense 1995 sexual harassment survey ( Rep. No. DMDC-96-014). Washington, DC: Defense Manpower Data Center.
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson, A. L., & Rosenfeld, P. (1994). Assessment of sexual harassment in the active duty Navy. Military Psychology, 6, 69–93.
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson, A. L., Rosenfeld, P., Booth-Kewley, S., & Magnusson, P. (1992). Assessment of sexual harassment in the Navy: Results of the 1989 Navy-wide survey ( Rep. No. NPRDC TR 92–11). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson, A. L., Rosenfeld, P., & Newell, C. (1993). Sexual harassment in the active duty Navy: Findings from the 1991 Navy-wide survey ( Rep. No. NPRDC TR 94–2). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Defense Manpower Data Center. (1988, November). Standardization of sexual harassment and discrimination survey measures ( Proceedings of the Defense Manpower Data Center meeting). Arlington, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Tsien, S., Williams B. A., & Mead, A. D. (1995). Fitting polytomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 143–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drasgow, F., & Lissak, R. I. (1983). Modified parallel analysis: A procedure for examining the latent dimensionality of dichotomously scored item responses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 363–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EEOC Guidelines, 29 C.F.R. §1604.11 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 425–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F., Magley, V. J., Drasgow, F., & Waldo, C. R. (1998). The 1995 Armed Forces Sexual Harassment Survey: Report on measurement of sexual harassment ( Rep. No. DMDC-98-005). Washington, DC: Defense Manpower Data Center.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., & Richards, M. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebhard, R. A., & LaBenne, F. J. (1993). An evaluation of individual empowerment and self-efficacy on sexual harassment in the work environment. Unpublished master's thesis, Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, OH.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government Accounting Office. (1994). DoD service academies: Update on the extent of sexual harassment ( Publication No. GA1.1: NSIAD-94-6). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Government Accounting Office. (1995). DoD service academies: Update on the extent of sexual harassment ( Publication No. GA1.1: NSIAD-95-58). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, R. J. (1993). Personal harassment in the Canadian Forces: 1992 survey. Willowdale, Ontario: Canadian Forces Personnel Applied Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, M. V., & Williams, B. A. (1991, May). An overview and evaluation of nonparametric IRF estimation strategies. Paper presented at the meeting of Office of Naval Research Contractors on Model-Based Measurement, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, M. V., & Williams, B. A. (1993). Nonparametric models for polychotomously scored item responses: Analysis and integration. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Magley, V. J., Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & DeNardo, M. (1999). Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 390–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, M. (1990). Sexual harassment in the military: 1988. Washington, DC: Defense Manpower Data Center.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, M. (1991). Sexual harassment in the military: 1988. Sociological Practice Review, 2, 200–216.
   Google Scholar
• Maydeu-Olivares, A., Drasgow, F., & Mead, A. D. (1994). Distinguishing among parametric item response models for polychotomous ordered data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 18, 245–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, L. J., Hulin, C., & Drasgow, F. (2000). Longitudinal analysis of dispositional influences and sexual harassment: Effects on job and psychological outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 53, 21–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munson, L. J., Miner, A. G., & Hulin, C. L. (2001). Labeling sexual harassment in the military: An extension and replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 293–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muraki, E. (1996). A generalized partial credit model. In W. J. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Eds.), Handbook of modern item response theory (pp. 153–164). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch, M., & Nichol, K. L. (1995). Women veterans' experiences with domestic violence and with sexual harassment while in the military. Archives of Family Medicine, 4, 411–418.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Niebuhr, R. E. (1997). Sexual harassment in the military. In W. O. Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 250–262). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2000). Likelihood-based item-fit indices for dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24, 50–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, E. A. (1985). Wounded healers: A summary of the Vietnam Nurse Veteran Project. Military Medicine, 150, 571–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quenette, M. A. (1992). Navy-wide Personnel Survey (NPS) 1991: Management report of findings ( Rep. No. NPRDC-TR-92-20). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, K. E. (1989). Women in the armed services: Career and family intentions and expectations. Canberra, Australia: Department of Defense.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, K. E. (1995). Sexual harassment in the Australian Defense Force. Canberra, Australia: Australian Army Psychology Corps.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld, P., & Culbertson, A. L. (1994). Command Assessment Team Survey System (CATSYS): User guide ( Rep. No. NPRDC-TN-94-11). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores (Psychometric Monograph No. 18). Iowa City, IA: Psychometric Society.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, D. (1991). MULTILOG user's guide (Version 6). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1986). A taxonomy of item response models. Psychometrika, 51, 567–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turban, D. B., Sanders, P. A., Francis, D. J., & Osburn, H. G. (1989). Construct equivalence as an approach to replacing validated cognitive ability selection tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 62–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense. (1995). Status of the Armed Forces Survey: 1995 Form B-Gender Issues ( Survey No. 95–001b). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. A. (1999). EMPOCC: A computer program for IRT fit plots. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. H., Fitzgerald, L. F., Harned, M. H., & Lancaster, A. R. (1999). Research on sexual harassment in the military: A review and analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar