Relating Cohesion to Stress, Strain, Disintegration, and Performance: An Organizing Framework

References

• Adler, A. B., Vaitkus, M. A., & Martin, J. A. (1996). Combat exposure and posttraumatic stress symptomatology among U.S. soldiers deployed to the Gulf War. Military Psychology, 8. 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderman, E. M. (1992, August). Classroom practices and perceptions of school culture: An HLM model. Paper presented at the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• ARCOST Action Team. (1980, May). Improving stability and enhancing cohesion in the U.S. Army. Unpublished technical report, Department of the Army, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Armfield, F. (1994). Preventing post-traumatic stress disorder resulting from military operations. Military Medicine, 159, 739–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Army Research Branch. (1943). Officer interest in men-As the men themselves see it (Rep. No. ETO-11). Washington, DC: Headquarters, Office of Chief Administration, European Theater of Operations.
   Google Scholar
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartko, J. J. (1976). On various intraclass correlation reliability coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 83, 762–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartone, P. T., & Adler, A. B.. (1999/this issue). Cohesion over time in a peacekeeping medical task force. Military Psychology, 11, 85–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battistich, V., Solomon, D., Kim, D., Watson, M. & Schaps, E. (1995). Schools as communities, poverty levels of student populations, and students' attitudes, motives, and performance: A multilevel analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 627–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. (1990). Thinking sociologicaly. Cambridge, England: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Beebe, G. W., & Apple, J. W. (1951). Variation in psychological tolerance to ground combat in World War 11 (Final report). Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Council, Division of Medical Sciences, Follow-up Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Belenky, G., Noy, S., & Solomon, Z. (1987). Battle stress, morale, cohesion, combat effectiveness, heroism, and psychiatric casualties: The Israeli experience. In G. Belenky (Ed.), Contemporary studies in combat psychiatry (pp. 11–20). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L. (1954). Group standards, cohesiveness, and productivity. Human Relations, 7, 509–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L. (1956). Group norms among bomber crews: Patterns of perceived crew attitudes, “actual” crew attitudes, and crew liking related to aircrew effectiveness in Far Eastern combat. Socionietry, 29, 141–153.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, L. (Ed.). (1978). Group process. New York: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Bliese, P., & Halverson, R. R. (1996). Individual and nomothetic models of job stress: An examination of work hours, cohesion, and well-being. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 1171–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69, 479–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1988). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and group resistance to disruption. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 199–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. (Eds.). (1968). Group dynamics: Research and theory. Evanston, IL: Row & Peterson.
   Google Scholar
• Cobb, S. (1976). Social support as a moderator of life stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, 300–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. (1992). Stress, social support, and disorder. In H. O. F. Veiei, & U. Baumann (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support (pp. 109–123). New York: Hemisphere.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S., & Wills, T. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coser, L. (1956). Functions of social conflict. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cota, A. A., Dion, K. L. Evans, C. R., Kilik, L., & Longman, R. S. (1995). The structure of group cohesion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 572–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrona, C. E. (1990). Stress and social support: In search of optimal matching. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of the Army. (1982, June). Training, developing, and maintaining unit cohesion (Department of the Army Pamphlet No. 350-2). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Department of the Army. (1998). Field manual 22-100: Military leadership (Draft). Fort Leavenworth, KS: Center for Army Leadership.
   Google Scholar
• Derogatis, L. R. (1975). Brief Symptom Inventory. Baltimore, MD: Clinical Psychometric Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dohrenwend, B. S., & Dohrenwend, B. P. (Eds.). (1984). Stressful life events and their contexts. New York: Neale Watson.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, H. (1978, October). Self-presentations of general psychological well-being of American adults. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, E. (1951). Suicide: A study in sociology (G. Simpson, Ed., and J. A. Spaulding, & G. Simpson, Trans.). New York: Free Press. ( Original work published 1897)
   Google Scholar
• Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressure in informal groups. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Figley, C. R. (Ed.). (1978). Stress disorders among Vietnam veterans. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, R. B. (1990). Social support and psychological trauma: A methodological review. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 3, 593–611.
   Google Scholar
• Foy, D. W., Sipprelle, R. C., Rueger, D. B., & Carroll, E. M. (1984). Etiology of post-traumatic stress disorder in Vietnam veterans: Analysis of premilitary, military, and combat exposure influences. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52, 79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, R. (1986). Unit morale: From a theoretical puzzle to an empirical illustration-An Israeli example. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 549–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, R., & Jones, F. D. (1995). A psychological model of combat stress. In F. D. Jones L. R. Sparacino V. L. Wilcox J. M. Rothberg, & J. W. Stokes (Eds.), War psychiatry (pp. 133–148). Washington, DC: TMM Publications at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center.
   Google Scholar
• Gal, R., & Manning, F. J. (1987). Morale and its components: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 17, 369–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallops, M. Laufer, R. S., & Yager, T. (1981). Revised combat scale. In R. S. Laufer, & T. Yager (Eds), Legacies of Vietnam: Comparative adjustments of veterans and their peers (Vol. 3, p. 125). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, A. J. (1957, April). Observations upon the epidemiology of mental illness in troops during warfare. Paper presented at the Symposium on Socia) Psychiatry, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, A. J. (Ed.). (1973). Neuropsychiatry in World War II: Overseas theaters (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Department of the Army, Office of the Surgeon General.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, A. J. Ryan, F. J. Lubin, A. Ramona, C. V., & Tucker, A. C.. (1957). Psychiatric prediction and military effectiveness, Part 3. U.S. Armed Forces Medical Journal, 8, 346–357.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goh, S. C. Young, D. J., & Fraser, T. J. (1995). Psychosocial climate and student outcomes in elementary mathematics classrooms: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, D. P. (Ed.). (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, J. (1988). The measurement of group cohesion in U.S. Army units. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 149–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, J. (1989). The army's new unit replacement system and its relationship to group cohesion and social support. Military Psychology, 1, 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, J. (1997). Test of a model incorporating stress, strain, and disintegration in the cohesion-performance relation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1489–1526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinker, R. R., & Spiegel, J. P. (1945). Men under stress. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, N., & Martin, W. E. (1952). On group cohesiveness. American Journal of Sociology, 52, 546–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gully, S. M., Devine, D. J., & Whitney, D. J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26, 497–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gully, S. M., Whitney, D. J., & Devine, D. J. (1993, May). Bringing cohesion to group cohesion: A literature review and meta-analysis. Paper presented at the 8th Annual Convention of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, San Francisco.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, W. D. (1985). Cohesion: The human element in combat. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. (1976). Stress response syndromes. New York: Aronson.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M., Wilner, N., & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of Events Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, R. L. (1982). Psychiatric epidemiology and prevention: An overview of the possibilities. In R. L. Hough, P. A. Gongia, V. B. Brown, & S. E. Goldston (Eds), Psychiatric epidemiology and prevention: The possibilities (pp. 1–28). Los Angeles: Neuropsychiatric Institute.
   Google Scholar
• House, J. S. (1974). Occupational stress and coronary heart disease: A review and theoretical integraion. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 15, 12–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Joyce, W., & Slocum, J. W. (1988). Organizations do not cognize. Academy of Management Review, 19, 129–132.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions andflascoes (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, J. H. (1984). Cohesion in the U.S. military. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keane, T. M., Caddell, J., & Taylor, K. L. (1988). Mississippi Scale for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: Three studies in reliability and validity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 85–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellett, A. (1982). Combat motivation: The behavior of soldiers in battle. Boston: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkland, F. R., Bartone, P. T, & Marlowe, D. H. (1993). Commanders' priorities and psychological readiness. Armed Forces and Society, 19, 579–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Hattrup, K. (1992). A disagreement about within-group agreement: Disentangling issues of consistency versus consensus. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 161–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, G. P. (1991). Sustained military performance in continuous operations: Combatant fatigue, rest, and sleep needs. In R. Gal, & A. D. Mangelsdorff (Eds), Handbook of military psychology (pp. 255–277). West Sussex, England: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Langner, T. S., & Michael, S. T. (1963). Life stress and mental illness: The midtown Manhattan study, (Vol. 2). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laufer, R. S. (1985). War, trauma, and human development: Vietnam. In S. Sonnenberg A. Blank, & J. Talbott (Eds.), The trauma of war: Stress and recovery in Vietnam veterans (pp. 31–55). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. L. (1969). Patterns of adjustment and human effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, N., Dean, A., & Ensel, W. M. (Eds). (1986). Social support, life events, and depression. Orlando, FL: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Lindell, M. K., & Futch, C. J. (1996, April). Measuring inter-rater agreement using rwg(j). Paper presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of the Society for Industrial Organizational Psychology, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Little, R. W. (1964). Buddy relations and combat performance. In M. Janowitz (Ed.), The new military: Changing patterns of organization (pp. 195–224). New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness as interpersonal attraction. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259–309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mael, F. A., & Alderks, B. E. (1993). Leadership team cohesion and subordinate work unit morale and performance. Military Psychology, 5, 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Manning, F. J., & Ingraham, L. H. (1987). An investigation into the value of unit cohesion during peacetime. In G. L. Belenky (Ed.), Contemporary studies in combat psychology (pp. 47–68). Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Mareth, T. R. (1985). Combat stress reaction: A concept of evolution. Military Medicine, 159, 186–190.
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe, D. H. (1979). Cohesion, anticipated breakdown, and endurance in battle: Consideration for severe and high intensity combat. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, S. L. A. (1966). Men against fire. New York: Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R., & Davids, K. (1995). The effects of group development techniques on a professional athletic team. Journal of Social Psychology, 135, 533–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychological Bulletin, 1, 30–46.
   Google Scholar
• Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look. Human Relations, 42, 771–785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, B., & Cooper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesion and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noy, S. (1978, June). Stress and personality as factors in the causality and prognosis of combat reaction. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Psychosocial Stress and Adjustment in Time of War and Peace, Jerusalem.
   Google Scholar
• Noy, S. (1987). Battle intensity and the length of stay on the battlefield as determinants of the type of evacuation. Military Medicine, 152, 601–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnery, J. A. (1993, April). Relationships between classroom climate, student characteristics, and language achievement in the elementary classroom: An exploratory investigation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, L. W. (1990). The relationship of group cohesion to group performance: A meta-analysis and critique of the literature. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, L. W., Harman, J., Hoover, E., Hayes, S. M., & Pandhi, N. A. (1999/this issue). A quantitative integration of military cohesion literature. Military Psychology, 11, 57–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olmsted, M. S., & Hare, A. P. (1978). The small group. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Ostroff, O. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level of analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 963–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L. (1983). The dynamics of small groups. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan, B., Raudenbush, S. W., & Kang, S. J. (1991). Organizational design in high schools: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Education, 99, 238–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., & Pierce, G. R. (1990). Social support: The search for theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9, 133–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, P. L., & Gabriel, R. A. (1976). Cohesion and disintegration in the American Army. Armed Forces and Society, 2, 340–376.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, S. (1959). The psychology of affiliation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuier, R. S. (1980). Definition and conceptualization of stress in organizations. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 184–215.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, A. (1962). Collected papers: Vol. 1. The problem of social reality. The Hague, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarzwald, J., Solomon, Z. Weisenberg, M., & Mikulincer, M. (1987). Validation of the Impact of Events Scale for the psychological consequences of combat. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 251–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seashore, S. (1954). Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Shils, E. A. (1950). Primary groups in the American Army. In R. K. Merton, & P. F. Lazarsfeld (Eds.), Continuities in social research: Studies in the scope and method of the American soldier (pp. 16–39). Salem, NH: Ayer.
   Google Scholar
• Shils, E. A., & Janowitz, M. (1948). Cohesion and disintegration in the Wehrmacht in World War II. Public Opinion Quarterly, 12, 29–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siebold, G. L. (1993, August). The case for unit cohesion. Paper presented at the 101st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Siebold, G. L., & Kelly, D. (1988). Development of the Combat Platoon Cohesion Questionnaire ( Tech. Rep. No. 817). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. ( DTIC No. AD-A204 917)
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, C. R., & Fromkin, H. L. (1980). Uniqueness: The human pursuit of difference. New York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Z. (1989). Psychological sequelae of war: A 3-year prospective study of Israeli combat stress reaction casualties. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 177, 342–346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon, Z., & Mikulincer, M. (1990). Life events and combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder: The intervening role of locus of control and social support. Military Psychology, 2, 241–256.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Z., Mikulincer, M, & Hobfoll, S. E. (1986). Effects of social and battle intensity on loneliness and breakdown during combat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1269–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spink, K. S. (1998). Mediational effects of social cohesion on the leadership behavior-intention to return relationship in sport. Group Dynamics, 2, 92–100.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, A. A. (1976). Conflict and cohesion: A review of the literature. Social Forces, 20, 143–172.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, M., & Neumann, M. (1978). Traumatic neurosis and social support in the Yom Kippur War returnees. Military Medicine, 143, 866–868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 26–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stouffer, S. A., Lumsdaine, A. A., Lumsdaine, M. H., Williams, R. M. Jr., Smith, M. B., Janis, I. L., Star, S. A., & Cottrell, L. S. (Eds.). (1949). The American soldier: Combat and its aftermath: Vol. 2. Studies in social psychology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Swank, R. L., & Marchand, W. E. (1946). Combat neuroses: Development of combat exhaustion. Archives of Neurological Psychiatry, 55, 236–247.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1954). The behavior of small groups under stress conditions of “survival.” American Sociological Review, 19, 751–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1957). What happens to the sociometrie structure of small groups in emergencies and extreme conditions. Group Psychotherapy, 10, 212–220.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, E. P. (1961). A theory of leadership and interpersonal behavior under stress. In L. Petrullo, & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Leadership and interpersonal behavior (pp. 100–117). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, M. P., & Gifford, R. K. (1991). Fatal training accidents: The military unit as a recovery context. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 4, 233–249.
   Google Scholar
• Vaitkus, M., & Griffith, J. (1990). An evaluation of unit replacement on individual morale and unit cohesion in the all-volunteer army. Military Psychology, 2, 221–239.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, B. A. (1997). When soldiers quit: Studies in military disintegration. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
   Google Scholar
• Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (1985). The measurement of cohesion in sports teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. London, Canada: Sports Dynamics.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, T. A. (1985). Supportive functions of interpersonal relationships. In S. Cohen, & S. L. Syme (Eds.), Social support and health (pp. 61–82). Orlando, FL: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., Brown, P., & Kelley, J. M. (1993). Reassessing war stress: Exposure and the Persian Gulf War. Journal of Social Issues, 49(4), 15–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worchel, S., & Shackelford, S. L. (1991). Groups under stress: The influence of group structure and environment on process and performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 640–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K. M., Marlowe, D., & Gifford, R. K. (1996). Deployment stress and Operation Desert Shield: Preparation for the war. In R. J. Ursano, & A. E. Norwood (Eds), Emotional aftermath of the Persian Gulf War (pp. 283–314). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yitzhaki, T., Kotler, M., & Solomon, Z. (1991). The clinical picture of acute combat stress reaction among Israeli soldiers in the 1982 Lebanon War. Military Medicine, 156, 193–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership in organizations (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., & Lowe, C. A. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 547–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S. J., & McCoy, C. (1988). The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimbardo, P. G. (1970). The human choice: Individuation, reason and order vs. deindividuation, impulse and chaos. In W. J. Arnold, & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1969 (Vol. 17, pp. 237–307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar