REFERENCES
- Bastian, L. D., Lancaster, A. R., & Reyst, H. E. (1996). Department of Defense 1995 sexual harassment survey ( Rep. No. 96–014). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
- Donovan, M. A., & Drasgow, F. (1999/ this issue). Do men’s and women’s experiences of sexual harassment differ? An examination of the differential test functioning of the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire. Military Psychology, 11, 265–282.
- Drasgow, F., Fitzgerald, L. F., Magley, V. J., Waldo, C. R., & Zickar, M. J. (1998). The 1995 armed forces sexual harassment survey: Report on scales and measures ( Rep. No. 96–015). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
- Edwards, J. E., Elig, T. W., Edwards, D. L., & Riemer, R. A. (1997a). The 1995 armed forces sexual harassment survey: Administration, datasets, and codebook for Form A ( Rep. No. 95–014). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
- Edwards, J. E., Elig, T. W., Edwards, D. L., & Riemer, R. A. (1997b). The 1995 armed forces sexual harassment survey: Administration, datasets, and codebook for Form B ( Rep. No. 95–015). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
- Edwards, J. E., Elig, T. W., Edwards, D. L., & Riemer, R. A. (1997c). The 1995 armed forces sexual harassment survey: Administration, datasets, and codebookfor Form C ( Rep. No. 95–016). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
- Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.
- Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., & Magley, V. J. (1999/ this issue). Sexual harassment in the armed forces: A test of an integrated model. Military Psychology, 11, 329–343.
- Fitzgerald, L. F., Magley, V. J., Drasgow, F., & Waldo, C. R. (1999/ this issue). Measuring sexual harassment in the military: The Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ–DoD). Military Psychology, 11, 243–263.
- Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164–177.
- Hay, M. S., & Elig, T. W. (1999/ this issue). The 1995 Department of Defense sexual harassment survey: Overview and methodology. Military Psychology, 11, 233–242.
- Hunter Williams, J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1999/ this issue). The effects of organizational practices on sexual harassment and individual outcomes in the military. Military Psychology, 11, 303–328.
- Magley, V. J., Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & DeNardo, M. (in press). The effects of self-labeling sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology.
- Magley, V. J., Waldo, C. R., Drasgow, F., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999/ this issue). The impact of sexual harassment on military personnel: Is it the same for men and women? Military Psychology, 11, 283–302.
- Martindale, M. (1990). Sexual harassment in the military: 1988. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
- Mason, R. E., Kavee, J. A., Wheeless, S. C., George, B. J., Riemer, R. A., & Elig, T. W. (1996). The 1995 armed forces sexual harassment survey: Statistical methodology report ( Rep. No. 96–016). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
- U.S. Department of the Army. (1997). Senior review panel report on sexual harassment (Vol. 1 ). Washington, DC: Author.
- U.S. Department of Defense. (1996). News release: 1995 sexual harassment survey: Washington, DC: Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (Public Affairs).
- U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment of federal workers: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1988). Sexual harassment of federal workers: An update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1995). Sexual harassment in the federal workforce: Trends, progress, continuing challenges. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.