Measuring Sexual Harassment in the Military: The Sexual Experiences Questionnaire (SEQ—DoD)

REFERENCES

• Arvey, R. D., & Cavanaugh, M. A. (1995). Using surveys to assess the prevalence of sexual harassment: Some methodological problems. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, L. D., Lancaster, A. R. & Reyst, H. E. (1996). Department of Defense 1995 sexual harassment survey ( Rep. No. 96–014). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
   Google Scholar
• Berdahl, J. L., Magley, V. J., & Waldo, C. R. (1996). The sexual harassment of men? Exploring the concept with theory and data. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 527–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butcher, J. N. (1993). The Minnesota report: Adult clinical system-revised: MMP1–2 ( User’s guide). Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dansky, B. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (1997). Effects of sexual harassment. In W. O’Donohue. (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 152–174). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Derogatis, L. R. (1993). Symptom Checklist-90-R. Minneapolis, MN: National Computer Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F. (1990). Sexual harassment: The definition and measurement of a construct. In M. Paludi (Ed.), Ivory power: Sexual harassment on campus (pp. 21–44). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F. Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., & Magley, V. J. (1999/ this issue). Sexual harassment in the armed forces: A test of an integrated model. Military Psychology, 11, 329–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Psychology, 17, 425–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, A., Ormerod, A. J., & Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Magley, V. J. (1997). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research and treatment (pp. 5–28). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, J. E. (1989). How women handle sexual harassment: A literature review. Social Science Research, 74, 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Harmon, L. W., Hansen, J. C., Borgen, F. H., & Hammer, A. L. (1994). Applications and technical guide for the Strong Interest Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, M. S., & Elig, T. W. (1999/ this issue). The 1995 Department of Defense sexual harassment survey: Overview and methodology. Military Psychology, 11, 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1996). Organizational influences on sexual harassment. In M. Stockdale (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace (Vol. 5, pp. 127–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter Williams, J., Fitzgerald, L. R., & Drasgow, F. (1999/ this issue). The effects of organizational practices on sexual harassment and individual outcomes in the military. Military Psychology, 11, 303–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. & Sörbom, D. (1993). New features in LISREL 8 [ Computer program]. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Magley, V. J., Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & DeNardo, M. ( in press). The effects of self-labeling sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology.
   Google Scholar
• Magley, V. J., Waldo, C. R., Drasgow, F., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999/ this issue). The impact of sexual harassment on military personnel: Is it the same for men and women? Military Psychology, 11, 283–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martindale, M. (1990). Sexual harassment in the military: 1988. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, K. T., Swan, S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 401–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, B. V., Barnwell, B. G., & Bieler, G. S. (1995). SUDAAN user’s manual: Software for analysis of correlated data. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Studd, M. V., & Gattiker, U. E. (1991). The evolutionary psychology of sexual harassment in organizations. Ethology and Sociobiology, 12, 249–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Till, F. J. (1980). Sexual harassment: A report on the sexual harassment of students. Washington, DC: National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Programs.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment of federal workers: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1988). Sexual harassment of federal workers: An update. Wash ington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Waldo, C. R., Berdahl, J. L., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1998). Are men sexually harassed? If so, by whom? Law and Human Behavior.
   Google Scholar