562
Views
23
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Do Men's and Women's Experiences of Sexual Harassment Differ? An Examination of the Differential Test Functioning of the Sexual Experiences Questionnaire

&
Pages 265-282 | Published online: 17 Nov 2009

REFERENCES

  • Austin, J. T., & Villanova, P. (1992). The criterion problem: 1917–1992. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 836–874.
  • Baker, F. B., Al-Karni, A., & Al-Dosary, I. M. (1991). EQUATE: A computer program for the test characteristic curve method of IRT equating. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 78.
  • Berdahl, J. L., Magley, V. J., & Waldo, C. R. (1996). The sexual harassment of men? Exploring the concept with theory and data. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20, 527–547.
  • Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.
  • Bock, R. D., & Lieberman, M. (1970). Fitting a response model for n dichotomously scored items. Psychometrika, 35, 179–197.
  • Bock, R. D., & Mislevy, R. J. (1982). Adaptive EAP estimation of ability in a microcomputer environment. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 431–444.
  • Candell, G. L., & Drasgow, F. (1988). An iterative procedure for linking metrics and assessing item bias in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 12, 253–260.
  • Drasgow, F., Levine, M. V., Tsien, S., Williams, B., & Mead, A. D. (1995). Fitting polychotomous item response theory models to multiple-choice tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 143–165.
  • Drasgow, F., & Parsons, C. K. (1983). Applications of unidimensional item response theory models to multidimensional data. Applied Psychological Measurement, 11, 59–79.
  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.
  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric analysis. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 425–445.
  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, A., Ormerod, A. J., & Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152–175.
  • Fleer, P. F. (1993). A Monte Carlo assessment of a new measure of item and test bias. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago.
  • Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164–177.
  • Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hay, M. S., & Elig, T. W. (1999/this issue). The 1995 Department of Defense sexual harassment survey: Overview and methodology. Military Psychology, 11, 233–242.
  • Hulin, C. L. (1987). A psychometric theory of evaluations of item and scale translations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18, 115–142.
  • Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., & Parsons, C. K. (1983). Item response theory: Applications to psychological measurement. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
  • Jöreskog, R. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409–426.
  • Magley, V. J., Waldo, C. R., Drasgow, F., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1999/ this issue). The impact of sexual harassment on military personnel: Is it the same for men and women? Military Psychology, 11, 283–302.
  • Martindale, M. (1990). Sexual harassment in the military: 1988. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
  • McGrath, J. E. (1981). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. American Behavioral Scientist, 25, 179–210.
  • Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (1989). PC-BILOG 3 [Computer software], Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
  • Popovich, P. M., Campbell, K. L., Everton, W. J., Mangan, M. R., & Godinho, R. M. (1994, April). Perceptions of traditional and alternative forms of sexual harassment. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Nashville, TN.
  • Raju, N. S. (1996). DFITDUA: Differential functioning of items and tests for dichotomously-scored, unidimensional assessments [Computer program]. Atlanta: Georgia Institute of Technology.
  • Raju, N. S., van der Linden, W. J., & Fleer, P. F. (1995). IRT-based internal measures of differential functioning of items and tests. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19, 353–368.
  • Reise, S. P., Widaman, K. F., & Pugh, R. H. (1993). Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 552–566.
  • Segall, D. O. (1983). Test characteristic curves, item bias, and transformation to a common metric in item response theory: A methodological artifact with serious consequences and a simple solution. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign.
  • Stocking, M. L., & Lord, F. M. (1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 201–210.
  • U.S. Department of Defense. (1995). Status of the Armed Forces Survey: 1995 Form B–Gender Issues (Survey No. 95-001b). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
  • Vaux, A. (1993). Paradigmatic assumptions in sexual harassment research: Being guided without being misled. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 116–135.
  • Waldo, C. R., Berdahl, J. L., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1998). Are men sexually harassed? If so, by whom? Law and Human Behavior, 22, 59–79

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.