The Effects of Organizational Practices on Sexual Harassment and Individual Outcomes in the Military

REFERENCES

• Arnold v. City of Seminole. 614 F. Supp. 853, 40 FEP Cases at 1553 (E.D. Okla. 1985).
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J. B., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barret v. Omaha. National Bank, 726 F.2d 424, 35 FEP Cases 593 ( 8th Cir. 1984).
   Google Scholar
• Bastian, L. D., Lancaster, A. R., & Reyst, H. E. (1996). Department of Defense 1995 sexual harassment survey. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett v. Corroon & Black Corp., 845 F.2d 104, 105–6 (5th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1020 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Biaggio, M. K., Watts, D., & Brownell, A. (1990). Addressing sexual harassment: Strategies for prevention and change. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Ivory power: Sexual harassment on campus. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Broderick v. Ruder, 46 EPD & 38, 042 (D.D.C. 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson, A. L., & Rodgers, P. (1997). Improving managerial effectiveness in the workplace: The case of sexual harassment of Navy women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1953–1971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culbertson, A. L., & Rosenfeld, P. (1993). Understanding sexual harassment through organizational surveys. In P. Rosenfeld, J. E. Edwards, & M. D. Thomas (Eds.), Improving organizational surveys: New directions, methods, and applications (pp. 164–187). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Culbertson, A. L., & Rosenfeld, P. (1994). Assessment of sexual harassment in the active-duty Navy. Military Psychology, 6, 69–93.
   Google Scholar
• Dansky, B. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (1997). Effects of sexual harassment. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 152–174). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Fain, T. C., & Anderton, D. L. (1987). Sexual harassment: Organizational context and diffuse status. Sex Roles, 5, 291–311.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F. (1996). Institutional policies and procedures. In B. Lott & M. E. Reilly (Eds.), Combating sexual harassment in higher education (pp. 129–140). Washington, DC: NEA Professional Library Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, L. F., Hulin, C., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: An integrated model. In G. Keita & J. Hurrell Jr., (Eds.), Job stress in a changing workforce: Investigating gender, diversity, and family issues (pp. 55–73). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., Schneider, K. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of the antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decisions Processes, 71, 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grundmann, E. O., O’Donohue, W., & Peterson, S. H. (1997). The prevention of sexual harassment. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 175–184). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Gutek, B. A. (1997). Sexual harassment policy initiatives. In W. O’Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 185–198). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, M. S., & Elig, T. W. (1999 /this issue). The 1995 Department of Defense sexual harassment survey: Overview and methodology. Military Psychology, 11, 233–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesson-Mclnnis, M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Sexual harassment: A preliminary test of an integrative model. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 877–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1996). Organizational influences on sexual harassment. In M. Stockdale (Ed.), Sexual harassment in the workplace (Vol. 5, pp. 127–150). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• LaFontaine, E., & Tredeau, L. (1986). The frequency, sources, and correlates of sexual harassment among women in traditional male occupations. Sex Roles, 15, 433–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindemann, B., & Kadue, D. D. (1992). Sexual harassment in employment law (pp. 415–424). Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Livingston, J. A. (1982). Responses to sexual harassment on the job: Legal, organizational and individual actions. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magley, V. J., Zickar, M. J., Salisbury, J., Drasgow, F., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997, April). Evaluating the effectiveness of sexual harassment training. In L. F. Fitzgerald (Chair), Innovations in sexual harassment theory and methods: Old questions, new answers. Symposium conducted at the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
   Google Scholar
• Martindale, M. (1990). Sexual harassment in the military: 1988. Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
   Google Scholar
• Meritor Savings Bank. FSB v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 40 FEP Cases 1822 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Munson, L. J., Hulin, C., & Drasgow, F. (1998). Sexual harassment and temporal dynamics: The effects of sexual harassment over time. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Popovich, P. M. (1988). Sexual harassment in organizations. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 1, 273–282.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. B. (1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men. Sex Roles, 17, 269–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. B., Geidd, J. L., & Williams, K. B. (1995). A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 69–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. B., LaVite, C., & Stoller, L. (1993). A social psychological analysis of sexual harassment: The person/situation interaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 68–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. B., & Stoller, L. (1994). Sexual cognition processes in men high in the likelihood to sexually harass. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 163–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor, J. B., & Whalen, N. J. (1997). A typology of sexual harassment: Characteristics of harassers and the social circumstances under which sexual harassment occurs. In W. O’Donohue (Ed), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 129–151). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, C., Dyer, C. C., & Campbell, D. A. (1988). Campus harassment: Sexual harassment policies and procedures at institutions of higher learning. Signs, 13, 792–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, K. T. (1996, August). Bystander stress: The effect of organizational tolerance of sexual harassment on victims coworkers. Paper presented to the convention of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout v. Black Clawson Co., 689 F. Supp. 774,46 FEP Cases 1339 ( S.D. Ohio, 1988).
   Google Scholar
• Shupe, E., Cortina, L. M., Ramos, A., Buchanan, N. T., Trujillo, O., & Antonatos, A. (1996, March). The outcomes of sexual harassment of Hispanic women. In L. F. Fitzgerald (Chair), Expanding the scope of sexual harassment with diverse populations. Symposium conducted at the annual conference of the Association of Women in Psychology, Portland, OR.
   Google Scholar
• Sorenson, R. C., Luzio, R. C., & Mangione-Lambie, M. G. (1994, July). Perceived seriousness, recommended and expected organizational response, and effects of bystander and direct sexual harassment. Paper presented at the Third International Congress of Applied Psychology, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Defense. (1995). Status of the Armed Forces Survey: 1995 Form B-Gender Issues ( Survey No. 95–001b). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment of federal workers: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1988). Sexual harassment of federal workers: An update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine-French, S., & Radtke, H. L. (1989). Attributions of responsibility for an incident of sexual harassment in a university setting. Sex Roles, 21, 545–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates v. Avco Corporation, 819 F.2d 630, 43 FEP Cases 1595 (6th Cir. 1987).
   Google Scholar
• Zickar, M. J., Munson, L., & Hulin, C. L. (1997). Organizational antecedents of sexual harassment. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar