Governing Discourses of Stem Cell Research: Actors, Strategies, and Narratives in the United Kingdom and South Korea

References

• Beck Ulrich (2005). Power in the Global Age: A New Global Political Economy. Translated by Kathleen Cross. Cambridge: Polity
   Google Scholar
• Beck Ulrich (2009). World at Risk. Translated by Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge: Polity
   Google Scholar
• Beck Ulrich , Giddens Anthony , and Lash Scott (1994). Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Bioethics Advisory Committee (2001). Proposal to Approve Research Plan of Somatic Stem Cell Cloning. Seoul: Bioethics Advisory Committee
   Google Scholar
• Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (2006). BBSRC Delivery Plan, 2011–2015: Maximising Economic Growth in the Age of Bioscience. Swindon: BBSRC (http://www.bbsrc.ac.uk/web/FILES/Publications/delivery_plan_2011_2015.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu Pierre (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu Pierre (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Edited by Thompson John B. Translated by Gino Raymond and Matthew Adamson. Cambridge: Polity
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu Pierre (2004). Science of Science and Reflexivity. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Polity
   Google Scholar
• Burchell Kevin , Franklin Sarah , and Holden Kerry (2009). Public Culture as Professional Science: Final Report of the ScoPE Project. London: BIOS
   Google Scholar
• Castells Manuel (2009). Communication Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Durant John , Bauer Martin W. , and Gaskell George (1998). Biotechnology in the Public Sphere: A European Sourcebook. London: Science Museum
   Google Scholar
• Entman Robert M. (1993). Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm. Journal of Communication 4: 51–58
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault Michel (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977. Edited and translated by Colin Gordon. New York: Pantheon
   Google Scholar
• Franklin Sarah (2007). Dolly Mixtures: The Remaking of Genealogy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
   Google Scholar
• Franklin Sarah , and Kaftantzi Lamprini (2008). Industry in the Middle: Interview with Intercytex Founder and CSO, Dr. Paul Kemp. Science as Culture 17, no. 4: 449–62
   Google Scholar
• Gottweiss Herbert , and Robert Triendle (2006). Koreanische Träume. Die Zeit, 5 January
   Google Scholar
• Ha, Jungok (2006). Hanguk Saengmyunguiryogisului jeonhwane gwanhan yeongu: Jaesanegsangisulobuto saengmyunggonghakgisulo 한국 생명의료기술의 전환에 관한 연구: 재생산기술로부터 생명공학기술로 (Study on the Transformation of Korean Regenerative Medical Technology: From the Reproductive to the Biotechnological). PhD diss., Seoul National University
   Google Scholar
• Habermas Jürgen (1991). Reason and the Rationalization of Society (vol. 1 of The Theory of Communicative Action). Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Cambridge: Polity
   Google Scholar
• Hall Stuart Paul du Gay , eds. (1996). Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons (2000a). House of Commons Debate. 17 November. Hansard 356: 1175–230
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons (2000b). House of Commons Debate: Written Answers. 24 November. Hansard 357: 357W
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons (2002). Developments in Human Genetics and Embryology. HC 791 (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200102/cmselect/cmsctech/791/791.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• House of Commons (2007). Government Proposals for the Regulation of Hybrid and Chimera Embryos. HC 272-I (http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200607/cmselect/cmsctech/272/272i.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• Human Genetics Advisory Commission (1998). Cloning Issues in Reproduction, Science and Medicine. (http://www.advisorybodies.doh.gov.uk/hgac/papers/papers_c.htm, accessed 4 September 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff Sheila (2005). Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
   Google Scholar
• Kang Yang-gu , Kim Pyong-su , and Han Chae-gak (2006). Chimmukgwa Yeolgwang 침묵과열광 (Silence and Frenzy). Seoul: Humanitas
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Dongwook (2009). Keynote speech. Parliamentary Life Science Research Forum, Seoul, 16 April
   Google Scholar
• Kim Hunki (2005). Saengmyunggonghakgwa jeongchi 생명공학과 정치 (Biotechnology and Politics). Seoul: Whistler
   Google Scholar
• Kim Leo (2008). Explaining the Hwang Scandal: National Scientific Culture and Its Global Relevance. Science as Culture 4: 397–416
   Google Scholar
• Kim Leo (2009). Beyond Hwang: “International Stem Cell War” in South Korea. International Institute for Asian Studies: The Newsletter 52
   Google Scholar
• Kim Leo (2011a). “Your Problem Is That Your Face Reveals Everything When You Are Lying”: Making and Remaking of Conduct in South Korean Life Sciences. New Genetics and Society 3: 213–25
   Google Scholar
• Kim Leo (2011b). Media Framing of Stem Cell Research: A Cross-national Analysis of Political Representation of Science between the UK and South Korea. Journal of Science Communication 3: 1–16
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Namung (2000). Uriga Saengmyung Damdang: Himgyorugie Buban Duidjeon 우리가 생명담당: 힘겨루기에 법안 뒷전 (We Are Holding the Initiative of Life Science: Bill to Postpone under Power Struggle). Kookmin Newspaper 19 December (http://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode = LSD&mid = sec&sid1 = 102&oid = 005&aid = 0000036472)
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger Jenny (2008). Questioning Hype, Rescuing Hope? The Hwang Stem Cell Scandal and the Reassertion of Hopeful Horizons. Science as Culture 4: 417–34
   Google Scholar
• Korea Health Industry Development Institute (2005). Ten Major Strategies to Develop Stem-Cell Industry. Seoul: KHIDI
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff George , and Johnson Mark (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Latour Bruno (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Translated by Catherine Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
   Google Scholar
• Levidow Les (2007). European Public Participation as Risk Governance: Enhancing Democratic Accountability for Agrobiotech Policy? East Asian Science, Technology and Society 1: 19–51
   Google Scholar
• Myoung Jinsuk (2005). Saengmyunggonghakgisule Daehan Yeosungui Ipjang 생명공학기술에 대한 여성의 입장 (Women's Perspectives on Biotechnology). Hwangyunggwa 환경과 생명 45
   Google Scholar
• Nippert Irmgard (2002). The Pros and Cons of Human Therapeutic Cloning in the Public Debate. Journal of Biotechnology no. 98: 53–60
   Google Scholar
• Ong Aihwa Nancy N. Chen , eds. (2010). Asian Biotech: Ethics and Communities of Fate. Durham, NC: Duke University Press
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (2001). Open Channels: Public Dialogue in Science and Technology. Report no. 153 (http://www.parliament.uk/post/pr153.pdf, accessed 31 January 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Prainsack Barbara (2011). Overcoming Embryonic Exceptionalism? Lessons from Analyzing Human Stem Cell Research Regulation in Israel. New Genetics and Society 3: 267–77
   Google Scholar
• Sleator, Alex (2000). Stem Cell Research and Regulations under the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990, rev. ed. Research Paper 00/93, House of Commons Library (http://www.parliament.uk/commons/lib/research/rp2000/rp00-093.pdf, accessed 28 January 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Sleeboom-Faulkner Margaret (2011). Looking Beyond the Regulatory Exteriors of Stem Cell Research in Asia—Discussion. New Genetics and Society 30, no. 3: 279–88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Department of Health (2000). Stem Cell Research: Medical Progress with Responsibility (http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4065084, accessed 27 January 2012)
   Google Scholar
• UK Department of Health (2005). Human Reproductive Technologies and the Law: Government Responses to the Report from the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4117875, accessed 1 February 2012)
   Google Scholar
• UK Department of Health (2006). Review of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act: Proposals for Revised Legislation (Including Establishment of the Regulatory Authority for Tissue and Embryos). CM 6989 (http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Review_HFEA_Act_White_Paper_DH.pdf, accessed 15 January 2012)
   Google Scholar
• UK Department of Health and Social Security (1984). Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office (http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/Warnock_Report_of_the_Committee_of_Inquiry_into_Human_Fertilisation_and_Embryology_1984.pdf)
   Google Scholar
• UK Stem Cell Initiative (2005). UK Stem Cell Initiative: Report and Recommendations (http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_4123849, accessed 30 January 2012)
   Google Scholar
• Willis, Phil (2009). Democracy in Action: The HFE Act and Parliament. Presentation at Genomics Forum's Retrospective on the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act, London, 12 March 2009
   Google Scholar