An Indian Path to Biocapital? The Traditional Knowledge Digital Library, Drug Patents, and the Reformulation Regime of Contemporary Ayurveda

References

• Anuradha R. V. , Taneja Bansuri , and Kothari Ashish (2001). Experiences with Biodiversity Policy-Making and Community Registers in India. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
   Google Scholar
• AYUSH (1998). Annual Report 1997–1998. New Delhi: Department of Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy, Indian Ministry of Health.
   Google Scholar
• AYUSH (2001). Annual Report 2000–2001. New Delhi: Department of Ayurveda, Yoga, Unani, Siddha and Homeopathy, Indian Ministry of Health.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee Madhulika (2009). Power, Knowledge, Medicine: Ayurvedic Pharmaceuticals at Home and in the World. Hyderabad: Orient Blackswan.
   Google Scholar
• Bode Martin (2008). Taking Traditional Medicine to the Market: The Modern Image of the Ayurvedic and Unani Industry 1980–2000. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Calvert Jane , and Joly Pierre-Benoît (2011). How Did the Gene Become a Chemical Compound? The Ontology of the Gene and the Patenting of DNA. Social Science Information 50, no. 2: 157–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CIPR (2002). Integrating IPRs and Development Policy. London: Commission on Intellectual Property Rights.
   Google Scholar
• Cullet Philippe , and Raja Jawahar (2004). Intellectual Property Rights and Biodiversity Management: The Case of India. Global Environmental Politics 4, no. 1: 97–114.
   Google Scholar
• Dutfield Graham (1999). Protecting and Revitalising Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Intellectual Property Rights and Community Knowledge Databases in India. In Intellectual Property Aspects of Ethnobiology, edited by Barkeley Michael , 117–32. London: Sweet and Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudillière Jean-Paul (2010). Une marchandise scientifique? Savoirs, industrie et régulation du médicament dans l'Allemagne des années trente. Annales—Histoire, Sciences Sociales 65, no. 1: 89–120.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudillière Jean-Paul (2013). Plants, Practices of Reformulation and the Construction of Ayurvedic Drug Markets: The Trajectory of Jeevani and Other Polyherbals. Paper presented at the Eighth International Convention of Asia Scholars, Macau, June.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudillière Jean-Paul , and Joly Pierre-Benoît (2013). Crise des brevets de gènes et nouveaux objets d'appropriation: Vers une ontologie biologique de la propriété intellectuelle. In Le pouvoir de la biodiversité, edited by Thomas Fréderic and Boisvert Valérie , 115–24. Paris: Editions IRD.
   Google Scholar
• Gaudillière Jean-Paul , Kevles Daniel , and Rheinberger Hans-Jörg (2009). Living Properties: Making Knowledge and Controlling Ownership in the History of Biology. Preprint 382. Berlin: Max Planck Institute for History of Science.
   Google Scholar
• Government of India (2003). Ayurvedic Formulary of India, 2nd rev. English ed. New Delhi: Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta Vinod Kumar (2005). TKDL. Paper presented at the UNESCO-World Health Organization Subregional Experts Meeting in Asia on Intangible Cultural Heritage: Safeguarding and Inventory-Making Methodologies, Bangkok, 13–16 December.
   Google Scholar
• Helmreich Stefan (2008). Species of Biocapital. Science as Culture 17, no. 4: 463–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hermitte Marie-Angèle (2007). La convention sur la diversité biologique et les droits des peuples autochtones. Revue juridique de l'environnement 2007: 191–213.
   Google Scholar
• Kamau Evanson C. , Fedder Bevis , and Winter Gerd (2010). The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing. Law, Environment and Development Journal 6, no. 3: 246–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kevles Daniel (2002). A History of Patenting Life in the United States with Comparative Attention to Europe and Canada. Report to European Group on Ethics, Science and New Technology. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Leslie Charles (1989). Indigenous Pharmaceuticals, the Capitalist World System, and Civilization. Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers 69–70: 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Madhavan Harilal (2009). Commercializing “Traditional Medicine”: Ayurvedic Manufacturing in Kerala. Economic and Political Weekly 44, no. 16: 44–51.
   Google Scholar
• Naraindas Harish (2006). Of Spineless Babies and Folic Acid: Evidence and Efficacy in Biomedicine and Ayurvedic Medicine. Social Science and Medicine 62, no. 11: 2658–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (1992). Neem, a Tree for Solving Global Problems. Report of an ad hoc panel of the Board on Science and Technology for International Development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patwardhan Bhushan , and Mashelkar Raghunath Anant (2009). Traditional Medicine-Inspired Approaches to Drug Discovery: Can Ayurveda Show the Way Forward? Drug Discovery Today 14, no. 15–16: 804–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patwardhan Bhushan , and Vaidya Ashok D. B. (2010). Natural Product Discovery: Accelerating the Clinical Candidate Development using Reverse Pharmacology Approaches. Indian Journal of Experimental Biology 48: 220–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patwardhan Bhushan , Vaidya Ashok D. B. , Chorghade Mukund , and Joshi Swati P. (2008). Reverse Pharmacology and Systems Approaches for Drug Discovery and Development. Current Bioactive Compounds 4, no. 4: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pordié Laurent (2011). Savoirs thérapeutiques asiatiques et globalization. Revue d'Anthropologie des Connaissances 5, no. 1: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Pordié Laurent (2013). Pharmacy and the Question of Absorption in Techno-Ayurveda. Paper presented at the Eighth International Convention of Asia Scholars, Macau, June.
   Google Scholar
• Pordié Laurent , and Gaudillière Jean-Paul (2013). The Reformulation Regime in Drug Discovery: Revisiting Polyherbals and Property Rights in the Ayurvedic Industry. East Asian Studies of Science and Technology 8: 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pordié Laurent , Zimmermann Francis , and Gaudillière Jean-Paul (Unpublished manuscript 2014). Menosan: A Case of Reformulation in the Ayurvedic Industry.
   Google Scholar
• Pottage Alain (2007). Organisms and Manufactures: On the History of Plant Inventions. Melbourne University Law Review 31: 539–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pottage Alain (2010). Figures of Invention: A History of Modern Patent Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy Sita (2002). Asian Medicine in America: The Ayurvedic Case. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 583, no. 1: 97–121.
   Google Scholar
• Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2011). Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization. Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• Sivaramakhrishnan Kavita (2006). Old Potions, New Bottles: Recasting Indigenous Medicine in Colonial Punjab (1850–1945). New Delhi: Orient Longman.
   Google Scholar
• TKDL (2010). Panduvirkku Karisalai Llagam (www.tkdl.res.in, accessed February).
   Google Scholar
• TKDL (2013). TKDL Outcomes against Bio-piracy. Traditional Knowledge Digital Library (www.tkdl.res.in/tkdl/langdefault/common/Outcome.asp, accessed March).
   Google Scholar
• Venus (2012). Annual Report 2012. www.venusremedies.com/pdf/annualreports:Venus .
   Google Scholar
• WIPO (2010). Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
   Google Scholar
• W. R. Grace & Co. (1989). Hydrophobic Extracted Neem Oil: A Novel Insecticide and Fungicide. US Patent application 456762, filed 26 December.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann Francis (1989). Le discours des remèdes au pays des épices. Paris: Payot.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann Francis (1995). Généalogie des médecines douces. De l'Inde à l'Occident. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
   Google Scholar