562
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Introduction

We Have Never Been Latecomers!? Making Knowledge Spaces for East Asian Technosocial Practices

&

References

  • Anderson Warwick (2002). Introduction: Postcolonial Technoscience. Social Studies of Science 32, nos. 5–6: 643–58.
  • Anderson Warwick (2009a). From Subjugated Knowledge to Conjugated Subjects: Science and Globalisation, or Postcolonial Studies of Science? Postcolonial Studies 12, no. 4: 389–400.
  • Anderson Warwick (2009b). Re-orienting STS: Emergent Studies of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Southeast Asia. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 3, nos. 2–3: 163–71.
  • Anderson Warwick (2012). Asia as Method in Science and Technology Studies. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 6, no. 4: 445–51.
  • Anderson Warwick , and Adams Vincanne (2008). Pramoedya's Chicken: Postcolonial Studies of Technoscience. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed., edited by Hackett Edward J. Amsterdamska Olga Lynch Michael E. Wajcman Judy , 181–204. London: MIT Press.
  • Chakrabarty Dipesh (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Chen Jia-shin 陳嘉新 (2012). Rethinking the East Asian Distinction: An Example of Taiwan's Harm Reduction Policy. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 6, no. 4: 453–64.
  • Chen Ruey-Lin 陳瑞麟 (2012a). Discovering Distinctive East Asian STS: An Introduction. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 6, no. 4: 441–43.
  • Chen Ruey-Lin 陳瑞麟 (2012b). A Voyage to East Asian STS Theories; or, What Might Make an STS Theory East Asian. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 6, no. 4: 465–85.
  • Chen, Ruey-Lin 陳瑞麟 and Daiwie Fu 傅大為, eds. (2012). “What Is Distinctive East Asian STS: Method, Assemblages, or Theories?” Special issue of East Asian Science, Technology and Society 6, no. 4.
  • Clancey Gregory (2009). The History of Technology in Japan and East Asia. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 3, no. 4: 525–30.
  • Fan Fa-ti 范發迪 (2012). Doing East Asian STS Is Like Feeling an Elephant, and It Is a Good Thing. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 6, no. 4: 487–91.
  • Harding Sandra (2008). Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Harding Sandra , ed. (2011). The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Kowal Emma , Radin Joanna , and Reardon Jenny (2013). Indigenous Body Parts, Mutating Temporalities, and the Half-Lives of Postcolonial Technoscience. Social Studies of Science 43, no. 4: 465–83.
  • Latour Bruno (1993). We Have Never Been Modern. Harlow, England: Longman.
  • Latour Bruno (2013). An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Law John (2011). Collateral Realities. In The Politics of Knowledge, edited by Rubio Fernando D. and Baert Patrick , 156–78. London: Routledge.
  • Law John , and Lin 林文源 Wen-yuan (2010). Cultivating Disconcertment. Sociological Review 58, no. S2: 135–53.
  • Lin Wen-yuan 林文源 and Law John (2014). A Correlative STS? Lessons from a Chinese Medical Practice. Social Studies of Science 44, no. 6: 801–24.
  • Lin Wen-yuan 林文源 and Law John (forthcoming). Symptoms. In Making Things International 1: Circuits and Motion, edited by Salter Mark Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • McNeil Maureen (2005). Introduction: Postcolonial Technoscience. Science as Culture 14, no. 2: 105–12.
  • Moon Suzanne (2012). Theory and Community in STS. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 6, no. 4: 493–95.
  • Schiebinger Londa (2005). Introduction. Isis 96, no. 1: 52–55.
  • Seth Suman (2009). Putting Knowledge in Its Place: Science, Colonialism, and the Postcolonial. Postcolonial Studies 12, no. 4: 373–88.
  • Tsukahara Togo 塚原東吾 (2009). Introduction: Japanese STS in Global, East Asian, and Local Contexts. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 3: 505–9.
  • Verran Helen (2001). Science and an African Logic. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Viveiros de Castro Eduardo (2004). Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation. Tipiti 2, no. 1: 3–22.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.