54
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Diagnosing “Collaborative Culture” Of Biomedical Science in South Korea: Misoriented Knowledge, Competition, and Failing Collaboration

&
Pages 233-252 | Received 09 Sep 2014, Accepted 30 Jan 2015, Published online: 01 Oct 2020

References

  • Borch Christian (2005). Systemic Power: Luhmann, Foucault, and Analytics of Power. Acta Sociologica 48, no. 2: 155–67.
  • Bourdieu Pierre (1984). Homo Academicus. Paris: Les editions de minuit.
  • Brenner Robert (1976). Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-industrial Europe. Past and Present 70: 30–74.
  • Calvert Jane (2010). Systems Biology, Interdisciplinary and Disciplinary Identity. In Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, edited by Parker John N Vermeulen Niki Penders Bart . Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
  • Choi Jangjip (2002). Minjoohwa ehuui minjujuui 민주화이후의민주주의 Democracy after Democratization. Seoul: Humanitas.
  • Choi Sujin , Sung Woo Yang Joshua , and Woo Park Han (2015). The Triple Helix and International Collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 66, no. 1: 201–12.
  • Couchman Paul , and Fulop Liz (2002). Collaboration between Divergent Organizational Cultures: Perspectives on Risk in Cross-Sector Strategic R&D Alliances. Understanding Collaboration: International Perspectives on Theory, Method, and Practice, 53–58. Bristol, UK: University of the West of England.
  • Cyranoski David (2005). Korea's Stem-Cell Stars Dogged by Suspicion of Ethical Breach. Nature 429, no. 3 (DOI:10.1038/429003a).
  • Dreyfus Hubert , and Rabinow Paul (1982). Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Dutton, William H. (2008). Collaborative Network Organizations: New Technical, Managerial, and Social Infrastructures to Capture the Value of Distributed Intelligence. Paper presented at the EPSRC Workshop on “Managing for Usability: Challenges and Opportunities for E-Science Project Management,” at the Oxford e-Research Centre, University of Oxford, 10–11 April 2008 (http://www.oerc.ox.ac.uk/image-library/William percent20Dutton.pdf).
  • Etzkowitz Henry , and Leydesdorff Loet (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy 29, no. 2: 109–23.
  • Glänzel Wolfgang , and Schlemmer Balázs (2007). National Research Profiles in a Changing Europe (1983–2003): An Exploratory Study of Sectoral Characteristics in the Triple Helix. Scientometrics 70, no. 2: 267–75.
  • Giddens Anthony (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Hackett E. J. (2005). Introduction to the special guest-edited issue on scientific collaboration. Social Studies of Science 35, no. 5: 667–72.
  • Hunt Lynn (1984). Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  • Jang Deokho , and Kim Leo (2013). Framing “World Class” Differently: International and Korean Participants' Perceptions of the World Class University Project. Higher Education 65, no. 6: 725–44.
  • Khan Gohar Feroz , and Park Han Woo (2013). International Collaboration within Electronic Government Research Domain: A Triple Helix Network Analysis of Collaboration at the Regional, Country, and Institutional Levels. Government Information Quarterly 30, no. 2: 182–93 ( DOI 10.1016/j.giq.2012.09.003).
  • Kang Yangu , Kim Byungsoo , and Han Jaegak (2006). Chimmukgwa yeolgwang 침묵과 열광 (Silence and Frenzy). Seoul: Humanitas.
  • Katz J. Sylvan , and Martin Ben R (1997). What Is Research Collaboration? Research Policy 26: 1–18.
  • Kim Geunbae (2007). Hwang Woo Suk Sinhwawa Daehanmingook Gwahak (The Myth of Woo-Suk Hwang and Korean Science). Seoul: Yoksabipyungsa.
  • Kim Leo (2008). Explaining the Hwang Scandal: National Scientific Culture and Its Global Relevance. Science as Culture 17, no. 4: 397–415.
  • Kim Leo (2011). “Your Problem Is That Your Face Reveals Everything When You Are Lying”: Making and Remaking of Conduct in South Korean Life Sciences. New Genetics and Society 30, no. 3: 213–25.
  • Kim Leo (2012). Governing Discourses of Stem Cell Research: Actors, Strategies, and Narratives in the United Kingdom and South Korea. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 6, no. 4: 497–518.
  • Larivière Vincent , Gingras Yves , and Archambault Éric (2006). Canadian Collaboration Networks: Comparative Analysis of the Natural Sciences, Social Sciences, and the Humanities. Scientometrics 68, no. 3: 519–33.
  • Law John (1973). The Development of Specialties in Science: The Case of X-ray Protein Crystallography. Science Studies 3, no. 3: 275–303.
  • Lee Seungwon (2005). Hakgyoui tansaeng 학교의 탄생 (The Birth of Modern School). Seoul: Humanist.
  • Lee Young-Wan , and Lee Jun-Woo (2012). They Wanted to Inflate the Commercial Prospect of Their Company. Chosun ilbo 5 June (http://news.chosun.com/site/data/html_dir/2012/06/05/2012060500103.html).
  • Lemke Thomas (2011). Biopolitics: An Advanced Introduction. New York: New York University Press.
  • Leydesdorff Loet (2006). The Knowledge-Based Economy: Modeled, Measured, Simluated. Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.
  • Leydesdorff Loet , Wagner Caroline S. , Park Han Woo , and Adams Jonathan (2013). International Collaboration in Science: The Global Map and the Network. El profesional de la Información 22, no. 1: 87–94.
  • Mok Jung-Min (2012). Why Are There So Many Incidents in Stem Cell Academy? Kyunghyang Shinmun 4 June (http://news.khan.co.kr/kh_news/khan_art_view.html?code=930401&artid=201206042205405).
  • Moore Barrington (1966). Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • National Science Board (NSB) (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSB 12-01).
  • Park Han Woo , and Leydesdorff Loet (2008). Korean Journals in the Science Citation Index: What Do They Reveal about the Intellectual Structure of S&T in Korea? Scientometrics 75, no. 3: 439–62.
  • Parker John Vermeulen Niki Penders Bart , eds. (2010). Collaboration in the New Life Sciences. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
  • Prosecutor's office (2006). The Investigation Report on the Charge of Fraud in Stem Cell Research—Final Report. June.
  • Qin Jian, F , Lancaster Wilfrid , and Allen Bryce (1997). Types and Levels of Collaboration in Interdisciplinary Research in the Sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48, no. 10: 893–916.
  • Ryu, Young-Jun (2014). 8 nyunmanui gobaek 8 년만의고백: 내가황우석사기제보한이유는 (Confession Eight Years after the Scandal: “Why Did I Tip Woo-Suk Hwang Off about His Fraud?”). Munhwa Broadcast Company, 5 March (http://www.hani.co.kr/arti/society/society_general/626874.html).
  • Schott Thomas (1991). The World Scientific Community: Globality and Globalisation. Minerva 29, no. 4: 440–62.
  • Shapiro Matthew A (2007). Public-Private R&D Collaboration in Korea: A Survey of Public Sector Institutes. In Innovation and Technology in Korea: Challenges of a Newly Advanced Economy, edited by Mahlich Jörg and Pascha Werner , 93–113. New York: Springer.
  • Shapiro Matthew A. (2011). The Triple Helix Paradigm in Korea and Taiwan: A Test for New Forms of Capital. In Theory and Practice of the Triple Helix Model in Developing Countries, edited by Saad Mohammed and Zawdie Girma , 119–45. New York: Routledge.
  • Shrum Wesley (2010). Collaborationism. In Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, edited by Parker John N. Vermeulen Niki Penders Bart . Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
  • Sleeboom-Faulkner Margaret (2011). Looking Beyond the Regulatory Exteriors of Stem Cell Resesarch in Asia—Discussion. New Genetics and Society 30, no. 30: 279–88.
  • Sonderegger Petra (2009). Creating Shared Understanding across Distance: Distance Collaboration across Cultures in R&D. In E-research: Transformations in Scholarly Practice, edited by Jankowski Nick , 129–46. London: Routledge.
  • Sunder Rajan Kaushik (2006). Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Swan William , McDermott Peter , and Khalfan Malik (2007). The Application of Social Network Analysis to Identify Trust-Based Networks in Construction. International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations 4, no. 4: 369–82.
  • Thompson Charis (2010). Asian Regeneration? Nationalism and Internationalism in Stem Cell Research in South Korea and Singapore. In Asian Biotech: Ethics and Communities of Fate, edited by Ong Aihwa and Chen Nancy N , 95–117. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
  • Vermeulen Niki (2009). Supersizing Science: On Building Large Scale Research Projects in Biology. Mastricht, The Netherlands: Universitaire Pers Maastricht.
  • Vermeulen Niki , and Penders Bart (2010). Collecting Collaborations: Understanding Life Together. In Collaboration in the New Life Sciences, edited by Parker John Vermuelen Niki Penders Bart . Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
  • Viale Riccardo Etzkowitz Henry , eds. (2010). The Capitalization of Knowledge. Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
  • Wagner Caroline S (2008). The New Invisible College. Washington, DC: Brookings Press.
  • Wagner Caroline S , and Leydesdorff Loet (2005). Network Structure, Self-Organization, and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science. Research Policy 34, no. 10: 1608–18.
  • Whitley Richard (2007). Changing Governance of the Public Sciences. In The Changing Governance of the Sciences: The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems, edited by Whitley Richard and Gläser Jochen , 95–117. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Zhang Joey (2011). Scientific Institutions and Effective Governance: A Case Study of Chinese Stem Cell Research. New Genetics and Society 30, no. 2: 193–207.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.