38
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Transnational Research Collaboration: Expatriate Indian Faculty in the United States Connecting with Peers in India

&
Pages 275-293 | Received 31 Oct 2014, Accepted 04 Apr 2015, Published online: 01 Oct 2020

References

  • Adams James D. , Black Grant C. , Clemmons J. Roger , and Stephan Paula E. (2005). Scientific Teams and Institutional Collaborations: Evidence from US Universities, 1981–1999. Research Policy 34, no. 3: 259–85.
  • Agrawal Ajay , Cockburn Iain , and McHale John (2007). Gone but Not Forgotten: Knowledge Flows, Labor Mobility, and Enduring Social Relationships. Journal of Economic Geography 6, no. 5: 571–91.
  • Arthur Nancy , Patton Wendy A. , and Giancarlo Christine (2007). International Project Participation by Women Academics. Canadian Journal of Education 30, no. 1: 323–48.
  • Beaver Donald (2001). Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and Its Study): Past, Present, and Future. Scientometrics 52, no. 3: 365–77.
  • Beaver D. D. , and Rosen R. (1978). Studies in Scientific Collaboration, Part I. The Professional Origins of Scientific Co-authorship. Scientometrics 1: 65–84.
  • Ben-David Joseph (1971). The Scientist's Role in Society: A Comparative Study. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Bercovitz Janet , and Feldman Maryann (2008). Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level. Organization Science 19, no. 1: 69–89.
  • Bozeman Barry , and Corley Elizabeth (2004). Scientists' Collaboration Strategies: Implications for Scientific and Technical Human Capital. Research Policy 33, no. 4: 599–616.
  • Bozeman Barry , Fay Daniel , and Slade Catherine P. (2013). Research Collaboration in Universities and Academic Entrepreneurship: The-State-of-the-Art. Journal of Technology Transfer 38, no. 1: 1–67.
  • Bozeman Barry , and Gaughan Monica (2011). How Do Men and Women Differ in Research Collaborations? An Analysis of the Collaboration Motives and Strategies of Academic Researchers. Research Policy 40, no. 10: 1393–1402.
  • Bozeman Barry , and Slade C. (2012). Bad Research Collaborations: Perceptions and Impacts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Copenhagen, 19 October.
  • Bruneel Johan , D'Este Pablo , and Salter Ammon (2010). Investigating the Factors That Diminish the Barriers to University-Industry Collaboration. Research Policy 39, no. 7: 858–68.
  • Carayannis Elias G. , and Laget Patrice (2004). Transatlantic Innovation Infrastructure Networks: Public-Private, EU-US R&D Partnerships. R&D Management 34, no. 1: 17–31.
  • Chompalov Ivan , Genuth Joel , and Shrum Wesley (2002). The Organization of Scientific Collaborations. Research Policy 31, no. 5: 749–67.
  • Corley Elizabeth A. , and Sabharwal Meghna (2007). Scholarly Collaboration and Productivity Patterns in Public Administration: Analysing Recent Trends. Public Administration 88, no. 3: 627–48.
  • Cronin Blaise (2001). Hyperauthorship: A Postmodern Perversion or Evidence of a Structural Shift in Scholarly Communication Practices? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52, no. 7: 558–69.
  • Cummings Jonathon N. , and Kiesler Sara (2005). Collaborative Research across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries. Social Studies of Science 35, no. 5: 703–22.
  • Dietz James S. , and Bozeman Barry (2005). Academic Careers, Patents, and Productivity: Industry Experience as Scientific and Technical Human Capital. Research Policy 34, no. 3: 349–67.
  • Duque Ricardo B. , Ynalvez Marcus , Sooryamoorthy Radhamany , Mbatia Paul , Dzorgbo Dan-Bright S. , and Shrum Wesley (2005). Collaboration Paradox: Scientific Productivity, the Internet, and Problems of Research in Developing Areas. Social Studies of Science 35, no. 5: 755–85.
  • Engels Anita , and Ruschenburg Tina (2008). The Uneven Spread of Global Science: Patterns of International Collaboration in Global Environmental Change Research. Science and Public Policy 35, no. 5: 347–60.
  • Fox Mary Frank , and Mohapatra Sushanta (2007). Social-Organizational Characteristics of Work and Publication Productivity among Academic Scientists in Doctoral-Granting Departments. Journal of Higher Education 78, no. 5: 542–71.
  • Franklin Stephen J. , Wright Mike , and Lockett Andy (2001). Academic and Surrogate Entrepreneurs in University Spin-out Companies. Journal of Technology Transfer 26, no. 1–2: 127–41.
  • Freshwater Dawn , Sherwood Gwen , and Drury Vicki (2006). International Research Collaboration: Issues, Benefits, and Challenges of the Global Network. Journal of Research in Nursing 11, no. 4: 295–303.
  • Gazni Ali , and Didegah Fereshteh (2011). Investigating Different Types of Research Collaboration and Citation Impact: A Case Study of Harvard University's Publications. Scientometrics 87, no. 2: 251–65.
  • Georghiou Luke (1998). Global Cooperation in Research. Research Policy 27, no. 6: 611–26.
  • Gibbons Michael , Limoges Camille , Nowotny Helga , Schwartzman Simon , Scott Peter , and Trow Martin (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
  • Glänzel Wolfgang , Schubert Andrá , and Czerwon H.-J. (1999). A Bibliometric Analysis of International Scientific Cooperation of the European Union (1985–1995). Scientometrics 45, no. 2: 185–202.
  • Gómez Isabel , Fernández María Teresa , and Sebastián Jesús (1999). Analysis of the Structure of International Scientific Cooperation Networks through Bibliometric Indicators. Scientometrics 44, no. 3: 441–57.
  • Haeussler Carolin , and Colyvas Jeannette A. (2011). Breaking the Ivory Tower: Academic Entrepreneurship in the Life Sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy 40, no. 1: 41–54.
  • Hagedoorn John , Link Albert N. , and Vonortas Nicholas S. (2000). Research Partnerships. Research Policy 29, no. 4: 567–86.
  • Hessels Laurens K. , and van Lente Harro (2008). Re-thinking New Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda. Research Policy 37, no. 4: 740–60.
  • Hwang Kumju (2005). The Inferior Science and the Dominant Use of English in Knowledge Production: A Case Study of Korean Science and Technology. Science Communication 26, no. 4: 390–427.
  • Hwang Kumju (2008). International Collaboration in Multilayered Center-Periphery in the Globalization of Science and Technology. Science, Technology and Human Values 33, no. 1: 101–33.
  • Katz J. Sylvan , and Hicks Diana (1997). How Much Is a Collaboration Worth? A Calibrated Bibliometric Model. Scientometrics 40, no. 3: 541–54.
  • Katz J. Sylvan , and Martin Ben R. (1997). What Is Research Collaboration? Research Policy 26, no. 1: 1–18.
  • Knorr Cetina Karin (1999). Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Latour Bruno (1987). Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Lazăr Andreea (2011). Transnational Migration Studies: Reframing Sociological Imagination and Research. Journal of Comparative Research in Anthropology and Sociology 2, no. 2: 69–83.
  • Lee Sooho , and Bozeman Barry (2005). The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity. Social Studies of Science 35, no. 5: 673–702.
  • Levitt Peggy , and Jaworsky B. Nadya (2007). Transnational Migration Studies: Past Developments and Future Trends. Annual Review of Sociology, no. 33: 129–56.
  • Levitt Peggy Waters C. Mary , eds. (2002). The Changing Face of Home: The Transnational Lives of the Second Generation. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Liao Chien Hsiang (2011). How to Improve Research Quality? Examining the Impacts of Collaboration Intensity and Member Diversity in Collaboration Networks. Scientometrics 86, no. 3: 747–61.
  • Link Albert N. , and Siegel Donald S. (2005). University-Based Technology Initiatives: Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence. Research Policy 34, no. 3: 253–57.
  • Martinelli Arianna , Meyer Martin , and von Tunzelmann Nick (2008). Becoming an Entrepreneurial University? A Case Study of Knowledge Exchange Relationships and Faculty Attitudes in a Medium-Sized, Research-Oriented University. Journal of Technology Transfer 33, no. 3: 259–83.
  • Mattsson Pauline , Laget Patrice , Nilsson Anna , and Sundberg Carl-Johan (2008). Intra-EU vs. Extra-EU Scientific Co-publication Patterns in EU. Scientometrics 75, no. 3: 555–74.
  • Melin Göran (2000). Pragmatism and Self-Organization: Research Collaboration on the Individual Level. Research Policy 29, no. 1: 31–40.
  • Meyer Martin , and Bhattacharya Sujit (2004). Commonalities and Differences between Scholarly and Technical Collaboration. Scientometrics 61, no. 3: 443–56.
  • National Science Board (2014). Science and Engineering Indicators. NSB 14-01. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind14/content/etc/nsb1401.pdf).
  • Nilsson Anna S. , Rickne Annika , and Bengtsson Lars (2010). Transfer of Academic Research: Uncovering the Grey Zone. Journal of Technology Transfer 35, no. 6: 617–36.
  • Parker John N. , and Hackett Edward J. (2012). Hot Spots and Hot Moments in Scientific Collaborations and Social Movements. American Sociological Review 77, no. 1: 21–44.
  • Peters Michael A. (2006). The Rise of Global Science and the Emerging Political Economy of International Research Collaborations. European Journal of Education 41, no. 2: 225–44.
  • Ponomariov Branco L. , and Boardman P. Craig (2010). Influencing Scientists' Collaboration and Productivity Patterns through New Institutions: University Research Centers and Scientific and Technical Human Capital. Research Policy 39, no. 5: 613–24.
  • Price Derek J. de Solla (1963). Little Science Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Schartinger Doris , Schibany Andreas , and Gassler Helmut (2001). Interactive Relations between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria. Journal of Technology Transfer 26, no. 3: 255–68.
  • Schott Thomas (1998). Ties between Center and Periphery in the Scientific World-System: Accumulation of Rewards, Dominance and Self-Reliance in the Center. Journal of World Systems Research 4, no. 2: 112–44.
  • Shils Edward (1988). Center and Periphery: An Idea and Its Career, 1935–1987. In Center: Ideas and Institutions, edited by Greenfield Liah and Martin Michel , 250–82. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Smith Michael Peter Guarnizo Luis Eduardo , eds. (1998). Transnationalism from Below. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
  • Smith David , and Katz J. Sylvan (2000). Collaborative Approaches to Research: Final Report. A Report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England. Higher Education Policy Unit, University of Leeds, and Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex (http://users.sussex.ac.uk/∼sylvank/pubs/collc.pdf).
  • Stefaniak Barbara (2001). International Co-operation in Science and in Social Sciences as Reflected in Multinational Papers Indexed in SCI and SSCI. Scientometrics 52, no. 2: 193–210.
  • Stolberg Harold (2006). Funding International Science at the National Science Foundation. Arlington, VA: Office of International Science and Engineering.
  • Thorn Kristian , and Holm-Nielsen Lauritz B. (2008). International Mobility of Researchers and Scientists: Policy Options for Turning a Drain into a Gain. In The International Mobility of Talent: Types, Causes, and Development Impact, edited by Solimano Andrés , 145–63. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Traweek Sharon (1992). Big Science and Colonialist Discourse: Building High-Energy Physics in Japan. In Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research, edited by Galison Peter , 100–124. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • van Rijnsoever Frank J. , and Hessels Laurens K. (2011). Factors Associated with Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration. Research Policy 40, no. 3: 463–72.
  • Vertovec Steven Cohen Robin , eds. (1999). Migration, Diasporas, and Transnationalism. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.
  • Wagner Caroline S. (2005). Six Case Studies of International Collaboration in Science. Scientometrics 62, no. 1: 3–26.
  • Wagner Caroline S. , and Leydesdorff Loet (2005a). Mapping the Network of Global Science: Comparing International Co-authorships from 1990 to 2000. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation 1, no. 2: 185–208.
  • Wagner Caroline S. , and Leydesdorff Loet (2005b). Network Structure, Self-Organization, and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science. Research Policy 34, no. 10: 1608–18.
  • Waldinger Roger , and Fitzgerald David (2004). Transnationalism in Question. American Journal of Sociology 109, no. 5: 1177–95.
  • Wuchty Stefan , Jones Benjamin F. , and Uzzi Brian (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science 316, no. 5827: 1036–39.
  • Ziman John (1994). Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.