Measuring Change in Fibromyalgic Pain: The Relevance of Pain Distribution

REFERENCES

• Smythe H A. Non-articular rheumatism and psychogenic musculoskeletal syndromes. Arthritis and allied conditions, D J McCarthy. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia 1979; 881–891
   Google Scholar
• Yunus M B, Masi A T, Calabro J J, Miller K A, Feigenbaum S L. Primary fibromyalgia (fibrositis): Clinical study of 50 patients with matched normal controls. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1981; 11: 151–171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe F, Smythe H A, Yunus M B, Bennet R M, Bombardier C, Goldenberg D L, Tugwell P, Campbell S M, Abeles M, Clark P, Fam A G, Farber S J, Fiechtner J J, Franklin C M, Gatter R A, Hamaty D, Lessard J, Lichtbroun A S, Masi A T, McCain G A, Reynolds W J, Romano T J, Russell I J, Sheon R P. The american college of rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of fibromyalgia. Report of the multicenter criteria committee. Arthritis Rheum, 33: 160–172, 1990
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfe F, Ross K, Anderson J, Russell I J, Herbert L. The prevalence and characteristics of fibromyalgia in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 1995; 38: 19–28
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabriel S E, Bombardier C. Clinical trials in fibrositis: A critical review and future directions. J Rheumatol 1989; 16(suppl 19)177–179
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe F. Development of criteria for the diagnosis of fibrositis. Am J Med 1986; 81(suppl 3A)99–104
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldenberg D L. Workshop on managing fibrositis/fibromyalgia. Am J Med 1986; 81(suppl 3A)111
   Google Scholar
• Aitken R BC. Measurement of feelings using visual analogue scales. Proc Roy Soc Med 1969; 62: 17–24
   Google Scholar
• Huskisson E C. Subjective measurements in rheumatic diseases: Can we believe the patient? Is his overall opinion of efficacy sufficient? Use of visual analogue scales. Controversies in the clinical evaluation of analgesic, anti-inflammatory, anti-rheumatic drugs (Symposium, Santa Barbara 1980), H E Paulus, E Ehrlich, E Lindenlaub. Symposia Medica Hoechst, Stuttgart, 16: 83–87, 1981
   Google Scholar
• Miller M D, Ferris D G. Measurement of subjective phenomena in primary care research: The visual analogue scale. Fam Pract Res J 1993; 13: 15–24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wewers M E, Lowe N K. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health 1990; 13: 227–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carette S, McCain G A, Bell D A, Fam A G. Evaluation of amitriptyline in primary fibrositis. Arthritis Rheum 1986; 29: 655–659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCain G A, Bell D A, Mai F M, Halliday P D. A controlled study of the effects of a supervised cardiovascular fitness training program on the manifestations of primary fibromyalgia. Arthritis Rheum 1988; 31: 1135–1141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scudds R A, McCain G A, Rollman G B, Harth M. Improvements in pain responsiveness in patients with fibrositis after successful treatment with Amitriptyline. J Rheumatol 1989; 16(suppl 19)98–103
   Google Scholar
• Værøy H, Abrahamsen A, Førre ø, Kåss E. Treatment of fibromyalgia (Fibrositis syndrome): A parallel double blind trial with carisoprodol, paracetamol and caffeïne (Somadril comp) versus placebo. Clin Rheumatol 1989; 8: 245–250
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White K P, McCain G A, Tunks E. The effects of changing the painful stimulus upon dolorimetry scores in patients with fibromyalgia. J Musculoskeletal Pain 1993; 1(1)43–58
   Google Scholar
• Keele K D. Pain-sensitivity tests. The pressure algometer. Lancet 1954; 1: 636–639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huskisson E C. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2: 1127–1131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaise M G, Franchimont P. Methods of clinical and biological assessment of rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1987, suppl 65: 81–84
   Google Scholar
• Hørven Wigers S, Stiles T C, Vogel P A. Effects of aerobic exercise versus stress management treatment in fibromyalgia. A 4.5 year prospective study. Scand J Rheumatol, (in press)
   Google Scholar
• Masterton J P. Burns. Hamilton Bailey's Emergency Surgery, 11th ed., H AF Dudley. John Wright & Sons Ltd., Bristol 1986; 68–76
   Google Scholar
• Scott J, Huskisson E C. Graphic representation of pain. Pain 1976; 2: 175–184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes M HS, Patterson D G. Experimental development of the graphic rating method. Psychol Bull 1921; 18: 98–99
   Google Scholar
• Freyd M. The graphic rating scale. Journal of Educative Psychology 1923; 14: 83–102
   Google Scholar
• Tesler M D, Savedra C, Holzemer W L, Wilkie D J, Ward J A, Paul S M. The word-graphic rating scale as a measure of children's and adolescents' pain intensity. Res Nurs Health 1991; 14: 361–371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• öst L G. Applied relaxation: Description of a coping technique and review of controlled studies. Behav Res Ther 1987; 25: 397–409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck A T, Greenberg R L. Coping with depression (a booklet). Institute for rational living, New York 1974
   Google Scholar
• Mulaik S A. Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology. Confirmatory factor analysis., 2nd edition, J R Nesselroade, R B Cattell. Plenum Press, New York 1988; 259–288
   Google Scholar
• Long J S. A preface to LISREL. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07–033. Confirmatory factor analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills and London 1983
   Google Scholar
• Mislevy R J. Recent developments in the factor analysis of categorical variables. J Educational Stat 1986; 11: 3–31
   Google Scholar
• Muthén B O. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 1984; 49: 115–132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K G. Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika 1971; 36: 109–133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén B O. LISCOMP—a program for advanced research. Scientific Software. 1988
   Google Scholar
• Muthén B O, Satorra A. Technical aspects of Muthén's LISCOMP approach to estimation of latent variable relations with a comprehensive measurement model. Psychometrika 1995; 60: 489–503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werts C E, Linn R L, Jöreskog K G. Intraclass reliability Estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychol Measurement 1974; 34: 25–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aitchison J, Silvey S D. The generalization of probit analysis to the case of multiple responses. Biometrika 1957; 44: 131–150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunks E, Crook J, Norman G, Kalaher S. Tender points in fibromyalgia. Pain 1988; 34: 11–19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer A A. Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold. Pain 1987; 30: 115–126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scudds R A, Rollman G B, Harth M, McCain G. Pain perception and personality measures as discriminators in the classification of fibrositis. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 563–569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell I J, Vipraio G A, Morgan W W, Bowden C L. Is there a metabolic basis for the fibrositis syndrome?. Am J Med 1986; 81(suppl 3A)50–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell C. Sensitivity and accuracy of the visual analogue scale: A psycho-physical classroom experiment. Br J Clin Pharmacol 1978; 6: 15–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley B. Stochastic Simulation. Wiley, New York 1987
   Google Scholar
• Muthén B O, Kaplan D. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal likert variables. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1985; 38: 171–189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén B O, Kaplan D. A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal likert variables: A note on the size of the model. Br J Math Stat Psychol 1992; 45: 19–30
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar