Whiplash Mechanics in Low Speed Rear-End Automobile Collisions

REFERENCES

• Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. Special Issue: Whiplash Injuries 1995; 30: 8
   Google Scholar
• Carroll S. Report DB-139-ICJ, RAND Corp. 1992
   Google Scholar
• Barnsley L. Clinical review: Whiplash injury. Pain 1994; 58: 283–307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin R D. Secondary gain, everybody's rationalization. J Occup Med 1974; 16: 800–801
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendler E, O'Rourke J, Schulman M, Katzeff M, Domzalski L, Rodgers S. Effect of head and body position and muscular tensing on response to, impact. SAE 741184
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro A P, Roth R. The effect of litigation on recovery from whiplash injury. Spine: State of the Art Reviews 1993; 7: 531–556
   Google Scholar
• Spitzer W O, Skovron M L, Salmi L R, Cassidy D J, Duranceau J, Suissa S, Zeiss E. Scientific Monograph of the Quebec Task Force on Whiplash-Associated Disorders: Redefining “Whiplash” and its Management. 1995, Spine 20S: (8S), 2S-73S
   Google Scholar
• Swartzman L C, Teasell R W, Shapiro A P, McDermid A J. The effect of litigation status on adjustment to whiplash injury. Spine 1996; 21: 53–57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing C L, Thomas D J, Beeler G W, Jr., Patrick L M, Gillis D B. Dynamic response of the head and neck of the living human to—Gx impact acceleration., SAE 680792
   Google Scholar
• Matsushita T, Sato T B, Hirabayashi K, Fujimura S, Asazuma T. Takatori X-ray study of the human neck motion due to head inertia loading., SAE 942208
   Google Scholar
• McConnell W E, Howard R P, Guzman H M, Bomar J B, Raddin J H, Benedict J V, et al. Analysis of human test subject kinematic responses to low velocity rear end impacts., SAE 930889
   Google Scholar
• Mertz H J, Patrick L M. Strength and response of the human neck., SAE 710855
   Google Scholar
• Prasad P, Mital N, King A I, Patrick L M. Dynamic response of the spine during + Gx acceleration., SAE 751172
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt G, Kallieris D, Barz J, Mattern R, Klaiber J. Neck and thorax tolerance levels of belt protected occupants in head-on collisions., SAE 751149
   Google Scholar
• Siegmund G P, King D J, Lawrence J M, Wheeler J B, Brault J R, Smith T A. Head/neck kinematic response of human subjects in low speed rear-end collisions., SAE 973341
   Google Scholar
• Tencer A F, Martin D, Goodwin V, Schaefer G, Mirza S. Do Initial Head Rotation or Head CG Distance Above the Head Restraint Affect Head Kinematics in Response to a Rear-End Impact? Presented at SAE Whiplash 98 conference. Phoenix, AZ Nov, 1988
   Google Scholar
• White A A, Panjabi M M. Clinical Biomechanics of the Spine, 2nd Ed. JP Lip-pincott, Philadelphia, PA 1990; 47, (Table 1–8)
   Google Scholar
• McConnell W E, Howard R P, Van Poppel J, Krause R, Guzman H M, Bomar J B, et al. Human head and neck kinematics after low velocity rear-end impacts-understanding “whiplash.”, SAE 952724
   Google Scholar
• Severy D M, Mathewson J H, Bechtol C O. Canadian Services Medical Journal. 1955, 727–759
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panjabi M M, Grauer J N, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, Babat L B, Dvorak J. Whiplash trauma: a biomechanical viewpoint. Whiplash injuries: Current concepts in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the cervical whiplash syndrome., R Gunzburg, M. Szpalski. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia 1998; 79–87
   Google Scholar
• Ono K, Kaneoka K, Wittek A, Kajzer J. Cervical injury mechanism based on the analysis of human cervical vertebral motion and head-neck-torso kinematics during low speed rear impacts., SAE 973340
   Google Scholar
• Mertz H J, Patrick L M. Investigation of the kinematics and kinetics of whiplash., SAE 670919
   Google Scholar
• Tencer A F, Moore K V, Mirza S K. Presented at the Whiplash Associated Disorders, World Congress. The relationship of arm and low back symptoms in victims of actual low damage rear-end vehicle impacts. Vancouver, BC Feb, 1999
   Google Scholar
• Peterson K, Hildingsson C, Toolanen G, Fagerlund M, Bjornebrink J. Disc pathology after whiplash injury, a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and clinical investigation. Spine 1997; 22: 283–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens H J, Burow K. Experimental investigation on injury mechanisms of cervical spine at frontal and rear-front vehicle impacts., SAE 720960
   Google Scholar
• Siegmund G P, King D J, Montgomery D T. Using barrier impact data to determine speed change in aligned, low speed vehicle-to-vehicle collisions, SAE 960887
   Google Scholar
• Szabo T J, Welcher J. Dynamics of low speed crash tests with energy absorbing bumpers., SAE 921573
   Google Scholar
• Antonetti V W. Estimating the coefficient of restitution of vehicle-to-vehicle bumper impacts., SAE 980552
   Google Scholar
• Howard R P, Bomar J, Bare C. Vehicle restitution response in low velocity collisions., SAE 931842
   Google Scholar
• King D J, Bowler J J, Ptucha S J. Determination of bumper characteristics using prototype moving barriers., SAE 970956
   Google Scholar
• Malmsbury R N, Eubanks J J. Damage and/or impact absorber [isolator] movements observed in low speed crash tests involving Ford Escorts., SAE 940912
   Google Scholar
• Siegmund G P, Bailey M N, King D J. Characteristics of specific automobile bumpers in low velocity impacts., SAE 940916
   Google Scholar
• Dempster W T, Gaughran G RL. Properties of body segments based on size and weight. Am J Anatomy 1962; 120: 33–54
   Google Scholar
• Muzzy W H, III, Seeman M R, Willems G C, Lustick L S, Bittner A C, Jr. The effect of mass distribution parameters on head/neck dynamic response., SAE 861886
   Google Scholar
• Walker L B, Harris E H, Pontius U R. Mass, volume, center of mass and mass moment of inertia of head and head and neck of human body, SAE 730985
   Google Scholar
• Foust D R, Chaffin D B, Snyder R G, Baum J K. Cervical spine range of motion and dynamic response and strength of cervical muscles., SAE 730975
   Google Scholar
• Stapp J P. Human tolerance to deceleration. Am J Surg 1957; 93: 734–740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo T J, Welcher J B. Human subject kinematics and electromyographic activity during low speed rear impacts., SAE 962432
   Google Scholar
• Pope M H, Aleksiev A, Hasselquist L, Magnusson M L, Spratt K, Szpalski M. Neurophysiologic mechanisms of low velocity non-head-contact cervical acceleration. Whiplash injuries: Current concepts in prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the cervical whiplash syndrome., R Gunzburg, M. Szpalski. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia 1998; 89–93
   Google Scholar
• Benson B R, Smith G C, Kent R W, Monson C R. Effect of seat stiffness in out of position occupant response in rear end collisions., SAE 962434
   Google Scholar
• Svensson M Y, Lovsund P, Haland Y, Larsson S. Rear-end collisions-A study of the influence of backrest properties on head-neck motion using a new dummy neck., SAE 930343
   Google Scholar
• Severy D M, Brink H M, Baird J D. Backrest and head restraint design for rear-end collision protection., SAE 680079
   Google Scholar
• Ewing C L, Thomas D J, Lustick L, Muzzy W H, III, Willems G, Majewski P L. The effect of duration, rate of onset and peak sled acceleration on the dynamic response of the human head and neck, SAE 760800
   Google Scholar
• Portnoy H D. Intracranial pressure and head acceleration during whiplash., SAE 700900
   Google Scholar
• Berton R J. Whiplash: tests of influential variables., SAE 680080
   Google Scholar
• Melvin J W, McElhaney J H. Occupant protection in rear-end collisions., SAE 720033
   Google Scholar
• Lundell B, Jakobsson L, Alfredsson B, Jernstrom C, Isakkson-Hellman I. Guidelines for and the design of a car seat concept for improved protection against neck injuries in rear end car impacts., SAE 980301
   Google Scholar
• Wiklund K, Larsson H. SAAB active head restraint [SAHR] seat design to reduce the risk of neck injuries in rear impacts., SAE 980297
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong R W, Waters H P. Testing programs and research on restraint systems., SAE 690247
   Google Scholar
• Chandler R F, Christian R A. Crash testing of humans in automobile seats., SAE 700361
   Google Scholar
• Gadd C W, Culver C C, Nahum A M. A study of the responses and tolerances of the neck., SAE 710856
   Google Scholar
• Glenn T H. Anthropomorphic dummy and human volunteer tests of advanced and/or passive belt restraint systems., SAE 740579
   Google Scholar
• Kallieris D, Mattern R, Miltner E, Schmidt G, Stein K. Considerations for a neck injury criterion., SAE 912916
   Google Scholar
• Patrick L M, Levine R S. Injury to unembalmed belted cadavers in simulated collisions., SAE 751144
   Google Scholar
• Szabo T J, Welcher J B, Anderson R D, Rice M M, Ward J A, Paulo L R, Carpenter N J. Human occupant kinematic response to low speed rear end impacts., SAE 940532
   Google Scholar
• van der Horst M J, Thunnissen J GM, Happee R, van Haaster R MHP, Wismans J SHM. The influence of muscle activity on head-neck response during impact., SAE 973346
   Google Scholar
• West D H, Gough J P, Harper G TK. Low speed rear-end collision testing using human subjects. Accident Reconstruction Journal 1993; May/June: 22–26
   Google Scholar
• Wismans J, Spenny C H. Head-neck response in frontal flexion., SAE 841666
   Google Scholar
• Pincemaille Y, Trosseile X, Mack P, Tarriere C, Breton F, Renault B. Some new data related to human tolerance obtained from volunteer boxers., SAE 892435
   Google Scholar