Characteristics of Peer Reviewed Clinical Medicine Journals

References

• Desai , N. S. , Dole , E. J. , Yeatman , S. T. and Troutman , W. G. 1997 . “Evaluation of Drug Information in an Internet Newsgroup.” . Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association , NS37 July-August : 391 – 4 .
   Google Scholar
• Impicciatore , P. , Pandolfini , C. , Casella , N. and Bonati , M. 1997 . “Reliability of Health Information for the Public on the World Wide Web: Systematic Survey of Advice on Managing Fever in Children at Home.” . BMJ , 314 June 28 : 1875 – 9 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talley , R. C. 1997 . “Trouble on the Internet.” . American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy , 54 April 1 : 757
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1997 . “The Web of Information Inequality.” . Lancet , 349 June 21 : 1781
   Google Scholar
• Davidoff , F. 1998 . “Masking, Blinding, and Peer Review: The Blind Leading the Blinded.” . Annals of Internal Medicine , 128 January 1 : 66 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Crawford , W. 1998 . “Paper Persists: Why Physical Library Collections Still Matter.” . Online , 22 January-February : 42 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Fortney , L. 1998 . “World Wide Web Provides Little Full Text Content for Biomedi-cal Journals, Study Shows.” . At Your Service (EBSCO) no. 45 , July-August : 6
   Google Scholar
• Gould , S. J. 1998 . “Second-Guessing the Future.” . Natural History , 107 September : 20 – 9 . 64–6.
   Google Scholar
• Booth , C. C. 1982 . “Medical Communication: The Old and the New.” . BMJ , 285 July 10 : 105 – 8 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silburg , W. M. , Lundberg , G. D. and Musacchio , R. A. 1997 . “Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the Internet.” . JAMA , 277 April 16 : 1244 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Weld , C. R. 1848 . A History of the Royal Society , 177 – 82 . London : J.W. Parker .
   Google Scholar
• Lyons , H. 1944 . The Royal Society, 1660–1940 , 56 – 7 . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Brown , H. 1934 . Scientific Organizations in Seventeenth Century France, 1620–1680 , 185 – 207 . Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins .
   Google Scholar
• Kronick , D. A. 1990 . “Peer Review in 18th Century Scientific Journalism.” . JAMA , 263 March 9 : 1321 – 2 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth , C. 1981 . “Clinical Science in the Age of Reason.” . Perspectives in Biology and Medicine , 25 : 93 – 114 . Autumn
   Google Scholar
• Kahn , R. J. and Kahn , P. G. 1997 . “The Medical Repository-The First U.S. Medical Journal, 1797–1824.” . New England Journal of Medicine , 337 December 25 : 1926 – 30 .
   Google Scholar
• Burnham , J. C. 1990 . “The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review.” . JAMA , 263 March 9 : 1323 – 9 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkes , M. S. and Kravitz , R. L. 1995 . “Policies, Practices, and Attitude of North American Medical Journal Editors.” . Journal of General Internal Medicine , 10 August : 443 – 50 .
   Google Scholar
• Weller , A. C. 1987 . “Editorial Policy and the Assessment of Quality Among Medical Journals.” . Bulletin of the Medical Library Association , 75 October : 310 – 6 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eldredge , J. D. 1997 . “Identifying Peer-Reviewed Journals in Clinical Medicine.” . Bulletin of the Medical Library Association , 85 October : 418 – 22 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beritic , T. 1996 . “Medical Reviews and the Importance of Being a ‘Peer’ in Science.” . Israel Journal of Medical Sciences , 32 July : 573 – 6 .
   Google Scholar
• Altman , L. K. 1996 . “The Ingelfinger Rule, Embargoes, and Journal Peer Review-Part 1.” . Lancet , 347 May 18 : 1382 – 6 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldmann , D. R. 1995 . “Guardians of the Lamp.” . Journal of General Internal Medicine , 10 August : 474 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Knoll , E. 1990 . “The Communities of Scientists and Journal Peer Review.” . JAMA , 263 March 9 : 1330 – 2 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingelfinger , F. J. 1969 . “Annual Discourse-Swinging Copy and Sober Science.” . New England Journal of Medicine , 281 September 4 : 526 – 32 .
   Google Scholar
• Newell , F. W. 1991 . “The American Journal of Ophthalmology: 1965–1991.” . American Journal of Ophthalmology , 112 December : 723 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Horton , R. 1997 . “Sponsorship, Authorship, and a Tale of Two Media.” . Lancet , 349 May 17 : 1411 – 2 .
   Google Scholar
• Shell , E. R. 1998 . “The Hippocratic Wars.” . New York Times Magazine , June 28 : 34 – 38(N) . sec. 6
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher , R. H. and Fletcher , S. W. 1992 . “Pharmaceutical Advertisements in Medical Journals.” . Annals of Internal Medicine , 116 June 1 : 951 – 2 .
   Google Scholar
• Ahmad , S. R. and Wolfe , S. M. 1995 . “Advertising in Pediatrics.” . Pediatrics , 95 April : 617 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Wilkes , M. S. , Doblin , B. H. and Shapiro , M. F. 1992 . “Pharmaceutical Advertisements in Leading Medical Journals: Experts' Assessments.” . Annals of Internal Medicine , 116 June 1 : 912 – 9 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessler , D. A. 1992 . “Addressing the Problem of Misleading Advertising.” . Annals of Internal Medicine , 116 June 1 : 950 – 1 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller , R. D. 1993 . “The Publication of Commercially Sponsored Supplements.” . Anesthesia and Analgesia , 77 October : 651 – 2 .
   Google Scholar
• Hornbein , T. and Bero , L. 1995 . “The Publication of Commercially Sponsored Supplements.” . Anesthesia and Analgesia , 81 October : 887 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Manske , P. R. 1997 . “A Review of Peer Review.” . Journal of Hand Surgery , 22A September : 767 – 71 .
   Google Scholar
• Frank , E. 1996 . “Editors' Requests of Peer Reviewers: A Study and a Proposal.” . Preventive Medicine , 25 March-April : 102 – 4 .
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck , D. 1998 . “Behind the Scenes at the Journal: How Manuscripts Get into Print.” . Journal of the American Dietetic Association , 98 May : 519 – 20 .
   Google Scholar
• Tonks , A. 1995 . “Reviewers Chosen by Authors.” . BMJ , 311 July 22 : 210
   Google Scholar
• Smith , J. 1990 . “Journalology-Or What Editors Do.” . BMJ , 301 October 3 : 756 – 9 .
   Google Scholar
• Sharp , D. W. 1990 . “What Can and Should be Done to Reduce Publication Bias?” . JAMA , 263 March 9 : 1390 – 1 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller , A. C. 1991 . “Potential Bias in Editorial Peer Review: A Study of U.S. Medical Journals.” . Serials Librarian , 19 ( 3–4 ) : 95 – 103 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson , J. D. 1978 . “Peer Review and Publication.” . Journal of Clinical Investigation , 61 June : 1697 – 1701 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twentyman , P. and Selby , P. 1991 . “The Process of Peer Review.” . British Journal of Cancer , 63 February : 168 – 72 .
   Google Scholar
• Peters , J. “Electronic Peer Review: Completed Conference.” . MCB University Press . <http://www.mcb.co.uk/services/conferen/emh/emhcon1.htm> Environmental Management and Health
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor , M. 1979 . The Scientist as Editor , 35 New York : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• O'Connor , M. 1979 . The Scientist as Editor , 28 New York : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Forscher , B. K. 1980 . “The Role of the Referee.” . Scholarly Publishing , 11 January : 165 – 9 .
   Google Scholar
• Baue , A. E. 1985 . “Peer and/or Peerless Review.” . Archives of Surgery , 120 August : 885 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Berk , R. N. and Friedman , D. P. 1995 . “New Category of Peer-Review Decision: Rejection with Opportunity to Revise and Resubmit.” . AJR; American Journal of Roent-genology , 164 January : 235
   Google Scholar
• Saidman , L. J. 1996 . “Thanks, From the Editor to Many.” . Anesthesiology , 85 December : 1229 – 31 .
   Google Scholar
• Horton , R. 1998 . “The Journal Ombudsperson: A Step Toward Scientific Press Oversight.” . JAMA , 280 July 15 : 298 – 9 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sun , M. 1989 . “Peer Review Comes Under Peer Review.” . Science , 244 May 26 : 910 – 2 .
   Google Scholar
• Rennie , D. 1998 . “Congress on Biomedical Peer Review: History, Ethics, and Plans for the Future.” . JAMA , 280 July 15 : 213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin , A. 1994 . “Blind Peer Review: Tips for Authors, Reviewers, and Editors.” . Nurse Author & Editor , 4 : 1 – 2 . Fall
   Google Scholar
• Cleary , J. D. and Alexander , B. 1988 . “Blind Versus Nonblind Review: Survey of Selected Medical Journals.” . Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy , 22 July-August : 601 – 2 .
   Google Scholar
• Weller , A. C. 1990 . “Editorial Peer Review in US Medical Journals.” . JAMA , 263 March 9 : 1344 – 7 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roomans , G. M. 1996 . “Journal Review Should Be Open.” . Journal of NIH Research , 8 August : 30 – 1 .
   Google Scholar
• Coleman , R. and McDonald , L. 1996 . “The Electronic Medical Journal of Australia [EMJA] Online Peer Review Trial.” . LASIE; Information Bulletin of the Library Automated Systems Information Exchange , 27 June : 14 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Bingham , C. M. , Higgins , G. , Coleman , R. and Van Der Weyden , M. B. 1998 . “The Medical Journal of Australia Internet Peer-Review Study.” . Lancet , 352 August 8 : 441 – 5 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vanchieri , C. 1997 . “ ‘Outing’ Peer Review: Medical Editors Scrutinize the Value of Secrecy.” . Journal of the National Cancer Institute , 89 November 5 : 1568 – 9 .
   Google Scholar
• Blank , R. M. 1991 . “The Effect of Double-Blind Versus Single-Blind Reviewing: Experimental Evidence from the American Economic Review” . American Economic Review , 81 December : 1041 – 67 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters , D. P. and Ceci , S. J. 1982 . “Peer-Review Practices of Psychological Journals: The Fate of Published Articles, Submitted Again.” . Behavioral and Brain Sciences , 5 June : 187 – 95 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceci , S. J. and Peters , D. 1984 . “How Blind is Blind Review?” . American Psychologist , 39 December : 1491 – 4 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegelman , S. S. 1991 . “Assassins and Zealots: Variations in Peer Review.” . Radiology , 178 March : 637 – 42 .
   Google Scholar
• Gidez , L. I. 1991 . “The Peer Review Process: Strengths and Weaknesses-A Survey of Attitudes, Perceptions, and Expectations.” . Serials Librarian , 19 ( 3–4 ) : 75 – 85 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher , M. , Friedman , S. B. and Strauss , B. 1994 . “The Effects of Blinding on Acceptance of Research Papers by Peer Review.” . JAMA , 272 July 13 : 143 – 6 .
   Google Scholar
• McNutt , R. A. , Evans , A. T. , Fletcher , R. H. and Fletcher , S. W. 1990 . “The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer Review: A Randomized Trial.” . JAMA , 263 March 9 : 1371 – 6 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadad , A. R. , Moore , R. A. Carroll , D. 1996 . “Assessing the Quality of Reports of Randomized Clinical Trials: Is Blinding Necessary?” . Controlled Clinical Trials , 17 February : 1 – 12 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho , M. K. , Justice , A. C. Winker , M. A. 1998 . “Masking Author Identity in Peer Review: What Factors Influence Masking Success?” . JAMA , 280 July 15 : 243 – 5 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justice , A. C. , Cho , M. K. Winker , M. A. 1998 . “Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality? A Randomized Controlled Trial.” . JAMA , 280 July 15 : 240 – 2 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert , J. R. , Williams , E. S. and Lundberg , G. D. 1994 . “Is there a Gender Bias in JAMA's Peer Review Process?” . JAMA , 272 July 13 : 139 – 42 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman , H. and Merton , R. K. 1971 . “Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institu-tionalization, Structure and Functions of the Referee System.” . Minerva , 9 January : 66 – 100 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller , A. C. and Serzan , S. L. 1984 . “Criteria for Identifying a Refereed Journal.” . Journal of Higher Education , 55 November-December : 673 – 99 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz , S. , Calvert , E. Jackson , T. 1975 . “Acceptance and Rejection of Manuscripts.” . IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication , PC-18 September : 177 – 85 .
   Google Scholar
• Beyer , J. M. 1978 . “Editorial Policies and Practices Among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields.” . Sociological Quarterly , 19 : 68 – 88 . Winter
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciniega , L. T. and Miller , W. R. 1997 . “Where to Publish? Some Considerations Among English-Language Addiction Journals.” . Addiction , 92 December : 1639 – 48 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargens , L. L. 1990 . “Variation in Journal Peer Review Systems: Possible Causes and Consequences.” . JAMA , 263 March 9 : 1348 – 52 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney , M. J. 1976 . “Publication: The Endless Quest.” . In The Scientist as Subject: The Psychological Imperative , Edited by: Mahoney , M. J. 79 – 107 . Cambridge, MA : Ballinger .
   Google Scholar
• Budd , J. 1988 . “Publication in Library & Information Science: The State of the Literature.” . Library Journal , 113 September 1 : 125 – 31 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abby , M. , Massey , M. D. , Galandiuk , S. and Polk , H. C. 1994 . “Peer Review Is an Effective Screening Process to Evaluate Medical Manuscripts.” . JAMA , 272 July 13 : 105 – 7 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt , M. 1982 . “A University Without Walls.” . Outlook Magazine (Washington University School of Medicine) , 19 : 14 – 7 . Autumn
   Google Scholar
• Garfunkel , J. M. , Lawson , E. E. , Hamrick , H. J. and Ulshen , M. H. 1990 . “Effect of Acceptance or Rejection on the Author' Evaluation of Peer Review of Medical Manuscripts.” . JAMA , 263 March 9 : 1376 – 8 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abelson , P. 1990 . “Mechanisms for Evaluating Scientific Information and the Role of Peer Review.” . Journal of the American Society for Information Science , 41 April : 217 – 22 .
   Google Scholar
• Yankauer , A. 1985 . “Peering at Peer Review,” . CBE Views , 8 : 7 – 10 . Summer
   Google Scholar
• Whitman , N. and Eyre , S. 1985 . “The Pattern of Publishing Previously Rejected Articles in Selected Journals.” . Family Medicine , 17 January-February : 26 – 8 .
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marshall , E. 1995 . “Suit Alleges Misuse of Peer Review.” . Science , 270 December 22 : 1912 – 4 .
   Google Scholar
• Marshall , E. 1996 . “Trial Set to Focus on Peer Review.” . Science , 273 August 30 : 1162 – 4 .
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1997 . “The Farmington Consensus.” . Addiction , 92 December : 1617 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Huston , P. 1994 . “Information for Peer Reviewers.” . Canadian Medical Association Journal , 150 April 15 : 1211 – 6 .
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong , J. S. 1982 . “Research on Scientific Journals: Implications for Editors and Authors.” . Journal of Forecasting , 1 ( 1 ) : 83 – 104 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeBakey , L. 1976 . The Scientific Journal: Editorial Policies and Practices: Guidelines for Editors, Reviewers, and Authors , 18 – 21 . St. Louis : Mosby .
   Google Scholar
• Cho , M. K. and Bero , L. A. 1994 . “Instruments for Assessing the Quality of Drug Studies Published in the Medical Literature.” . JAMA , 272 July 13 : 101 – 4 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton , P. 1993 . “Flaws Documented, Reforms Debated at Congress on Journal Peer Review.” . JAMA , 270 December 15 : 2775 – 8 .
   Google Scholar
• Kemper , K. J. 1991 . “Pride and Prejudice in Peer Review.” . Journal of Clinical Epidemiology , 44 ( 4–5 ) : 343 – 5 .
   Google Scholar
• Waeckerle , J. F. and Callaham , M. L. 1996 . “Medical Journals and the Science of Peer Review: Raising the Standard.” . Annals of Emergency Medicine , 28 July : 75 – 7 .
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 1997 . “Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals.” . Annals of Internal Medicine , 126 January 1 : 36 – 47 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eldredge , J. 1998 . “A Proposed Research Agenda for Investigating Editorial Peer Review.” . Hypothesis; The Newsletter of the Research Section of MLA , 12 : 11 – 5 . Fall
   Google Scholar