Avoiding Bias in Relocation Cases

REFERENCES

• American Bar Association . 2004 . Model Code of Judicial Conduct Available online at www.abanet.org/cpr/mcjc/canon_3.html (Last accessed on May 30, 2005)
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association . 1994 . Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Divorce Proceedings. . American Psychologist. , 49 ( 7 ) : 677 – 680 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association . 2002 . Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Codes of Conduct. . American Psychologist. , 57 : 12 1060–1073 and available online at www.apa.org/ethics/code2002.html (Last accessed on May 30, 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Association of Family & Conciliation Courts . 1994 . Model Standards of Practice forChild Custody Evaluations. . Family Court Review. , 32 : 4 504–513 and available online at www.afccnet.org/resources/resources_model_child.asp(Last accessed on May 30, 2005). Note that the AFCC Model Standards of Practice for Child Custody Evaluations were revised effective at the AFCC Board meeting on May 31, 2006 but were not published at the time this article went to press. The new Model Standards, which similarly address the issue of bias, can be accessed at the AFCC web site, www.afccnet.org.
   Google Scholar
• Association of Family and Conciliation Courts . 2000 . Model Standards of Practice for Family and Divorce Mediation. . Family Court Review. , 39 : 1 121–134 and available online at www.afccnet.org/resources/resources_model_mediation.asp (Last accessed on May 30, 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Austin , W. 2000 . A Forensic Psychology Model of Risk Assessment for Child Relocation Law. . Family & Conciliation Courts Review. , 38 ( 2 ) : 192 – 207 .
   Google Scholar
• Austin , W. 2006 . Exploring Three Functions in Child Custody Evaluation for the Relocation Case: Prediction, Investigation, and Making Recommendations for a Long Distance Parenting Plan. . Journal of Child Custody. , (This volume)
   Google Scholar
• Bathurst , K. , Gottfried , A. and Gottfried , A. 1997 . Normative Data for the MMPI-2 in Child Custody Litigation. . Psychological Assessment. , 9 ( 3 ) : 205 – 211 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver , S. , Elman , I. and Fabricious , W. 2003 . Relocation of children after divorce and children's best interests: New evidence and legal considerations. . Journal of Family Psychology , 2 : 206 – 219 . 2003, 17
   Google Scholar
• California Rules of Court . 2005 . Rule 5.220. Court-Ordered Child Custody Evaluations. Available online at http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/rules/titlefive (Last accessed on May 30,
   Google Scholar
• California Supreme Court . 2004 . In re Marriage of LaMusga. , 32 Cal.4th 1072
   Google Scholar
• Cambridge Universities Press . 2004 . Cambridge Dictionaries Online Available online at www.dictionary.cambridge.org/ (Last accessed on May 30, 2005)
   Google Scholar
• Elrod , L. 2006 . “Moving On”-Searching for Standards for Relocation Cases. . Journal of Child Custody. , (This issue)
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer , G. and Todd , P. 1999 . Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. New York : Oxford University Press. . ABC Research Group
   Google Scholar
• Gindes , M. 1998 . The psychological effects of relocation for children of divorce. . Journal of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers , 15 ( 1 ) : 119 – 148 .
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein , J. , Freud , A. and Solnit , A. 1984 . Beyond the Best Interests of the Child. New York : Free Press. .
   Google Scholar
• Gould , J. 1998 . Conducting Scientifically Crafted Child Custody Evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications. .
   Google Scholar
• Gutheil , T. and Simon , R. 2004 . Avoiding Bias in Expert Testimony. . Psychiatric Annals. , 34 ( 4 ) : 260 – 270 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly , J. and Emery , R. 2003 . Children's Adjustment Following Divorce: Risk and Resilience Perspectives. . Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies , 52 ( 4 ) : 352 – 362 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly , J. and Lamb , M. 2003 . Developmental Issues in Relocation Cases Involving Young Children: When, Whether, and How? . Journal of Family Psychology , 17 ( 2 ) : 193 – 205 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb , M. , Sternberg , K. and Thompson , R. 1997 . The Effects of Divorce and Custody Arrangements on Children's Behavior, Development, and Adjustment. . Family & Conciliation Courts Review. , 35 ( 4 ) : 393 – 404 .
   Google Scholar
• Ramsey , S. 2006 . Personal Communication
   Google Scholar
• Rotman , A. 2000 . Personal Communication
   Google Scholar
• Shear , L. 1996 . Life stories, doctrines, and decision making: Three high courts decide the move-away dilemma. . Family and Conciliation Courts Review. , 34 : 439 – 458 .
   Google Scholar
• Shear , L. 2003 . Amicus Brief Submitted to the California Supreme Court in Re: Marriage of LaMusga
   Google Scholar
• Stahl , P. 1999 . Complex Issues in Child Custody Evaluations. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications. .
   Google Scholar
• Stahl , P. 2005 . The Benefits and Risks of Child Custody Evaluators Making Recommendations to the Court: A Response to Tippins and Wittmann. . Family Court Review. , 43 ( 2 ) : 260 – 265 .
   Google Scholar
• Tippins , T. and Wittman , J. 2005 . Empirical and Ethical Problems with Custody Recommendations: A call for Clinical Humility and Judicial Vigilance. . Family Court Review. , 43 ( 2 ) : 193 – 222 .
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein , J. 2003 . Amicus Brief Submitted to the California Supreme Court in Re: Marriage of LaMusga (Lead Author)(
   Google Scholar
• Warshak , R. 2003 . Amicus Brief Submitted to the California Supreme Court in Re: Marriage of LaMusga (Lead Author)(
   Google Scholar