Interpreting Intended Meanings after Right Hemisphere Brain Damage: An Analysis of Evidence, Potential Accounts, and Clinical Implications

REFERENCES

• Beeman, M. (1993). Semantic processing in the right hemi-sphere may contribute to drawing influences from dis-course. Brain and Language, 44, 80–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeman, M. (1998). Coarse semantic coding and discourse comprehension. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 255–284). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brookshire, R.H., & Nicholas, L.E. (1993). Discourse Com-prehension Test. Tucson: Communication Skill Builders. Brownell, H., & Martino, G. (1998). Deficits in inference and social cognition: The effects of right hemisphere brain damage on discourse. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 309–328). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, H.H., Carroll, J.J., Rehak, A., & Wingfield, A. (1992). The use of pronoun anaphora and speaker mood in the interpretation of conversational utterances by right hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 43, 121–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, H.H., Potter, H.H., Birhle, A.M., & Gardner, H. (1986). Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 27, 310–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownell, H.H., Potter, H.H., Michelow, D., & Gardner, H. (1984). Sensitivity to lexical denotation and connotation in brain-damaged patients: A double dissociation? Brain and Language, 22, 253–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, C., & Simpson, G.B. (1988). Neuropsychology of lexical ambiguity resolution: The contribution of divided visual field studies. In S.L. Small, G.W. Cottrell, & M.K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspec-tives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology, and artifi-cial intelligence (pp. 411–430). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarello, C. (1985). Hemisphere dynamics in lexical access: Automatic and controlled priming. Brain and Language, 26, 146–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarello, C. (1988). Lateralization of lexical processes in the normal brain: A review of visual half-field research. In H.H. Whitaker (Ed.), Contemporary reviews in neuropsy-chology (pp. 36–76). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarello, C. (1998). On codes of meaning and the meaning of codes: Semantic access and retrieval within and between hemispheres. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 141–160). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Chiarello, C., & Richards, L. (1992). Another look at categori-cal priming in the cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsy-chologia, 30, 381–392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiarello, C., Burgess, C., Richards, L., & Pollock, A. (1990). Semantic and associative priming in the cerebral hemi-spheres: Some words do, some words don't.. sometimes, some places. Brain and Language, 38, 77–104.
   Google Scholar
• Connelly, S. L., & Hasher, L. (1993). Aging and inhibition of spatial location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Hu-man Perception and Performance, 19, 1238-1250. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. (1983). Individual differences in integrating information between and within sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 561–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust, M.E., & Gernsbacher, M.A. (1996) Cerebral mecha-nisms for suppression of inappropriate information during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language, 53, 234–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederiksen, C.H., & Stemmer, B. (1993). Conceptual proc-essing of discourse by a right hemisphere brain-damaged patient. In H. H. Brownell & Y. Joanette (Eds.), Narrative discourse in neurologically impaired and normal aging adults (pp. 239–278). San Diego: Singular Publishing. Gernsbacher, M.A. (1990). Language comprehension as structure building. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M.A., & Faust, M.E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gernsbacher, M.A., Varner, K.R., & Faust, M.E. (1990). Investigating differences in general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 430–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, M. (1981). A bird is a bird is a bird: Making reference within and without superordinate categories. Brain and Language, 12, 313–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, W., LeDoux, J., & Stein, S. (1984). Constraints on the processing of indirect speech acts: Evidence from aphasiology. Brain and Language, 23, 26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., & Goulet, P. (1987). Inference deficits in right brain-damaged: Absence of evidence. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9, 271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., Goulet, P., & Hannequin, D. (1990). Right hemisphere and verbal communication. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, M.J., Hasher, L., Stoltzfus, E.R., Zacks, R.T., & Connelly, S.L. (1994). Inhibitory attentional mechanisms and aging. Psychology and Aging, 9, 103–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempler, D., Almor, A., & MacDonald, M.C. (1998). Teasing apart the contribution of memory and language impair-ments in Alzheimer's disease: An online study of sentence comprehension. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 7, 61–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBlanc, B., & Joanette, Y. (1996). Unconstrained oral nam-ing in left- and right-hemisphere-damaged patients: An analysis of naturalistic semantic strategies. Brain and Lan-guage, 55, 42–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemieux, S., Goulet, P., & Joanette, Y. (1993, October). Interpretation of speech acts by right-brain-damaged pa-tients: The effect of ecological context. Paper presented at the Academy of Aphasia, Tucson, AZ.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard, C.L., Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1997a). The use of contextual information by right-brain damaged indi-viduals in the resolution of ambiguous pronouns. Brain and Language, 57, 309–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, C.L., Waters, G.S., & Caplan, D. (1997b). The use of contextual information related to general world knowl-edge by right brain-damaged individuals in pronoun reso-lution. Brain and Language, 57, 343–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, R., Brownell, H.H., & Gardner, H. (1990). Discourse comprehension by right-hemisphere stroke patients: Defi-cits of prediction and revision. In Y. Joanette and H.H. Brownell (Eds.), Discourse ability and brain damage. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, P.S. (1991). Inference failure: The underlying impair-ment in right-hemisphere communication disorders. Clini-cal Aphasiology, 20, 167–180.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, P.S., & Brookshire, R.H. (1994). The effects of visual and inferential complexity on the picture description of non-brain-damaged and right-hemisphere-damaged adults. Clinical Aphasiology, 22, 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Onifer, W., & Swinney, D.A. (1981). Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of fre-quency of meaning and contextual bias. Memory and Cog-nition, 9, 225–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortony, A., Schallert, D.L., Reynolds, R.E., & Antos, S.J. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of VerbalLearning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 455–477.
   Google Scholar
• Rehak, A., Kaplan, J.A., Weylman, S.A., Kelly, B., Brownell, H.H., & Gardner, H. (1992). Story processing in right-hemisphere brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 42, 320–336.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, L., & Chiarello, C. (1995). Depth of associated activation in the cerebral hemispheres: Mediated vs direct priming. Neuropsychologia, 33,171–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roman, M., Brownell, H.H., Potter, H.H., & Seibold, KS. (1987). Script knowledge in right hemisphere-damaged and in normal elderly adults. Brain and Language, 31, 151-170. Schmitzer, A.B., Strauss, M., & DeMarco, S. (1997). Contex-tual influences on comprehension of multiple-meaning words by right hemisphere brain-damaged and non-brain-damaged adults. Aphasiology, 11, 447–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiderman, El., Murasugi, K.G., & Saddy, D.J. (1992). Story arrangement ability in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 43, 107–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneiderman, El., & Saddy, D.J. (1988). A linguistic deficit resulting from right-hemisphere damage. Brain and Lan-guage, 34, 38–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L., Swinney, D., & Borsky, S. (1998). Online exami-nation of language performance in normal and neurologi-cally impaired adults. American Journal of Speech-Lan-guage Pathology, 7, 49–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, R.J. (1991). Age-related increases in the effects of automatic semantic activation. Psychology and Aging, 6, 595–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, G.B., & Burgess, C. (1988). Implications of lexical ambiguity resolution for word recognition and comprehen-sion. In S.L. Small, G.W. Cottrell & M.K. Tanenhaus (Eds.), Lexical ambiguity resolution: Perspectives from psycholinguistics, neuropsychology and artificial intelli-gence (pp. 271–288). San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Stemmer, B., & Joanette, Y. (1998). The interpretation of narrative discourse of brain-damaged individuals within the framework of a multilevel discourse model. In M. Beeman & C. Chiarello (Eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 329–348). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associ-ates, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Swinney, D. (1979). Lexical access during sentence compre-hension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 645-659. Swinney, D.A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and process-ing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523–534.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A. (1990). Knowledge and strategies for proc-essing lexical metaphor after right or left hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 33, 307–316.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A. (1991a). Automatic and effortful processing of emotional intonation after right or left hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 820–830.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A. (1991b). Redundancy enhances emotional inferencing by right- and left-hemisphere-damaged adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 34, 1142–1149. Tompkins, C.A. (1995). Right hemisphere communication disorders: Theory and management. San Diego: Singular Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A., & Baumgaertner, A. (1998). Clinical value of online measures for adults with right hemisphere brain damage. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathol-ogy, 7, 68–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A., Baumgaertner, A., Lehman, M.T., & Fossett, T.R.D. (1997). Suppression and discourse compre-hension in right brain-damaged adults: A preliminary re-port. Aphasiology, 11, 505–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A., Lehman, M.T., Baumgaertner, A., Fossett, T.R.D., & Vance, J.E. (1996). Suppression and discourse comprehension in right brain-damaged adults: Inferential ambiguity processing. Brain and Language, 55, 172-175. Tompkins, C.A., Bloise, C.G.R., Timko, M.L., & Baumgaertner, A. (1994). Working memory and inference revision in brain damaged and normally aging adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 37, 896-912. Tompkins, C.A., Spencer, K.A., & Boada, R. (1994). Contex-tual influences on judgments of emotionally ambiguous stimuli by brain-damaged and normally aging adults. Clini-cal Aphasiology, 22, 325–333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A., Boada, R., & McGarry, K. (1992). The access and processing of familiar idioms by brain-damaged and normally aging adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 35, 626–637.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tompkins, C.A., & Mateer, C.A. (1985). Right hemisphere appreciation of prosodic and linguistic indications of im-plicit attitude. Brain and Language, 24, 185–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, L.K. (1992). Spoken language comprehension: An experimental approach to disordered and normal process-ing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wapner, C.A., Hamby, S., & Gardner, H. (1981). The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex lin-guistic materials. Brain and Language, 14, 15-33. Weylman, ST., Brownell, H.H., Roman, M., & Gardner, H. (1989). Appreciation of indirect requests by left- and right-brain-damaged patients: The effects of verbal context and conventionality of wording. Brain and Language, 36, 580–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar