Management of Anomia

REFERENCES

• Goodglass H, Wingfield A, eds. Anomia: Neuroanatomical and Cognitive Correlates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Benson DF. Neurologic correlates of anomie. In: Whitaker H, Whitaker HA, eds. Studies in Neurolinguistics, Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press; 1979:293–328.
   Google Scholar
• Nickels L. Words fail me: symptoms and causes of naming breakdown in aphasia. In: Berndt RS, ed. Handbook of Neuropsychology, Vol. 3. 2nd ed. New York: Elsevier; 2001:115–134.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. Aphasia and Associated Disorders, Taxonomy, Localization and Recovery. Orlando, FL: Grune & Stratton; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio AR, Tranel D. Nouns and verbs are retrieved with differently distributed neural sys-tems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90:4957–4960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tranel D, Damasio H, Damasio AR. On the neurol-ogy of naming. In: Goodglass H, Wingfield A, eds. Anomia: Neuroanatomical and Cognitive Correlates. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1997:65–90.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza A, Hillis AE. Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex. 1990;26:95–122.
   Google Scholar
• Wilshire CE, Coslett HB. Disorders of word retrieval in aphasia: theories and potential applications. In: Nadeau SE, Gonzalez-Rothi II, Crosson B, eds. Aphasia and Language Theory to Practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2000:82–107.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza A. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access? Neuropsychology. 1997;14:177–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell GS, Schwartz MF, Martin N, Saffran EM, Gagnon DA. Lexical access in normal and aphasic speech. Psychol Rev. 1997;104:801–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt WJM, Roelofs A, Meyer AS. A theory of lexi-cal access in speech production. Behav Brain Sci. 1999;22:1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels LA, Best W. Therapy for naming deficits, part I. Principles, puzzles, and progress. Aphasiology. 1996;10:21–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best WM, Nickels LA. From theory to therapy in aphasia: where are we now and where to next. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2000;10:231–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels L. Therapy for naming disorders: revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology. 2002;16: 935–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymer AM, Rothi HG. The semantic system. In: Nadeau SE, Gonzalez Rothi K, Crosson B, eds. Aphasia and Language Theory and Practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2000:108–133.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt MM. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Dell GS. A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychol Rev. 1986;93: 283–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis AE, Caramazza A. The compositionality of lex-ical-semantic representations: clues from semantic errors in object naming. Memory. 1995;3:333–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothi IG, Raymer AM, Maher LM, Greenwald ML, Morris M. Assessment of naming failures in neuro-logical communication disorders. Clin Commun Disord. 1991;1:7–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Best WM. When racquets are baskets but baskets are biscuits, where do the words come from? A sin-gle-case study of formal paraphasic errors in apha-sia. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1996;13:443–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin N, Saffran EM. A computational account of deep dysphasia: evidence from a single case study. Brain Lang. 1992;43:240–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham HW. Phonemic paraphasias and psy-cholinguistic production models for neologistic jar-gon. Aphasiology. 1987;1:381–400.
   Google Scholar
• Warrington EK, Shallice T. Category specific seman-tic impairment. Brain. 1984;107:829–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah MJ, McMullen PA, Meyer MM. Can recogni-tion of living things be selectively impaired? Neuropsychologia. 1991;29:185–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels LA, Howard D. Aphasic naming: what mat-ters? Neuropsychologia. 1995;33:1281-1303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breedin SD, Saffran EM, Coslett HB. Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1994;11:617–660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard D, Orchard-Lisle VM. On the origin of semantic errors in naming; evidence from the case of a global dysphasic. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1984;1:163–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels LA, Howard D. A frequent occurrence? Factors affecting the production of semantic errors in aphasia naming. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1994;11:289–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymer AM, Foundas AL, Maher LM, Greenwald ML, Rothi LIG, Heilman KM. Cognitive neuropsy-chological analysis and neuroanatomic correlates in a case of acute anomia. Brain Lang. 1997;58: 137–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp B, Golderick M. Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psycho! Rev. 2000; 460–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels S, Stach C, Maher LM. Treatment of apha-sia: An annotated review of the research literature, 1946–2001. VA Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology Clinical Services Website. Accessed at: http://www.washington.med.va.gov/Audio-Speech/aphasia.doc. 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Raymer AM, Rothi LIG. Cognitive approaches to impairments of word comprehension and produc-tion. In: Chapey R, ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2001;524–550.
   Google Scholar
• Raymer AM, Ellsworth TA. Contrasting treatments for verb retrieval impairment in aphasia: a case study. Aphasiology. 2002;16:1031–1045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayles KA, Tomoeda CK. Confrontation naming impairment in dementia. Brain Lang. 1993;19: 98–114.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil MR, Doyle PJ, Spencer KA, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of pharmacological and behavioural treatment of lexical-semantic deficits in aphasia. Aphasiology. 1997;11:385–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinckley JJ, Craig HK. Influence of rate of treatment on the naming abilities of adults with chronic apha-sia. Aphasiology. 1998;12:989–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denes G, Perazzolo C, Piani A, Piccione F. Intensive versus regular speech therapy in global aphasia: a controlled study. Aphasiology. 1996;10:385–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhogal BA, TeaseII R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke. 2003;34:987–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothi LIG. Behavioral compensation in the case of treatment of acquired language disorders resulting from brain damage. In: Dixon RA, Mackman L, eds. Compensating for Psychological Deficits and Dedines: Managing Losses and Promoting Gains. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1995:219–230.
   Google Scholar
• Luria AR. Traumatic Aphasia. Mouton: Hague; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Linebaugh CW. Lexical retrieval problems: anomia. In: LaPointe LL, ed. Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Language Disorders. 2nd ed. New York: Thieme; 1997:112–132.
   Google Scholar
• Hillis AE. Efficacy and generalization of treatment for aphasic naming errors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:632–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis AE. Treatment of naming disorders: new issues regarding old therapies. I Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998;4:648–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson CK, Kearns KR An experimental analysis of acquisition, generalization and maintenance of naming behavior in a patient with anomia. In: Brookshire RH, ed. Clinical Aphasiology: Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers; 1981:35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald ML, Raymer AM, Richardson ME, Rothi LIG. Contrasting treatments for severe impairments of picture naming. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1995;5: 17–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard D, Patterson KJ, Franklin S, Ochard-Lisle V, Morton J. The facilitation of picture naming in aphasia. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1985;2:163–190.
   Google Scholar
• Hillis AE, Caramazza A. Theories of lexical process-ing and rehabilitation of lexical deficits. In: Riddoch MJ, Humphreys GW, eds. Cognitive Neuropsychology and Cognitive Rehabilitation. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum; 1994:449–484.
   Google Scholar
• Ochipa C, Maher LM, Raymer AM. One approach to the treatment of anomia. In: ASHA Special Interest Division 2: Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders Newsletter. 1998;15: 8–23.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle M. Semantic feature analysis: The evidence for treating lexical impairments in aphasia. In: AHSA Division 2: Neurophysiology (ST Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders Newsletter. 2001; 11(2):23–28.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle M, Coehlo CA. Application of semantic fea-ture analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia. Am I Speech Lang Pathol. 1995;4:94–98.
   Google Scholar
• Coehlo CA, McHugh R, Boyle M. Semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia: a replication. Aphasiology. 2000;14:133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis AE. Treatment of naming disorders: new issues regarding old therapies. I Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998;4:648–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis A, Pring T. Therapy for word finding deficits: more on the effects of semantic and phonological approaches to treatment with dysphasic patients. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1991;1:135–145.
   Google Scholar
• Raymer AM, Thompson CK, Jacobs B, LeGrand HR. Phonological treatment of naming deficits in apha-sia:model-basedgeneralizationanalysis.Aphasiology. 1993;7:27–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickin J, Herbert R, Best W, Howard D, Osborne F. Phonological therapy for word finding difficulties: a re-evaluation. Aphasiology. 2002;16:981–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard D. Cognitive neuropsychology and apha-sia therapy: the case of word retrieval. In: Papathanasiou I, ed. Acquired Neurogenic Communication Disorders: A Clinical Perspective. London: Whurr; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Drew RL, Thompson CK. Model-based semantic treatment for naming deficits in aphasia. I Speech Lang Hearing Res. 1999;42:972–989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce C, Howard D. Computer-generated phone-mic cues: an effective aid for naming in aphasia. Br I Disord Commun. 1987;22:191–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nickels L. The autocue? Self-generated phonemic cues in the treatment of a disorder of reading and naming. Cogn Neuropsychol. 1992;9:155–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoodin RB, Thompson CK. Facilitation of verbal labeling in adult aphasia by gestural, verbal or ver-bal plus gestural training. In: Brookshire RH, ed. Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers; 1983:62–64.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns KP, Simmons NN, Sisterhen C. Gestural sign (Amer-Ind) as a facilitator of verbalization in patients with aphasia. In: Brookshire RH, ed. Clinical Aphasiology Conference Proceedings. Minneapolis, MN: BRK Publishers; 1982:183–191.
   Google Scholar
• Pashek GV. A case study of gesturally cued naming in aphasia: dominant versus nondominant hand training. I Commun Disord. 1997;30:349–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashek GV. Gestural facilitation of noun and verb retrieval in aphasia: a case study. Brain Lang. 1998;65:177–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose M, Douglas J, Matyas T. The comparative effectiveness of gesture and verbal treatments for a specific phonological naming impairment. Aphasiology. 2002;16:1001–1031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hux K, Beukelman DR, Garrett KL, Augmentative and alternative communication for persons with aphasia. In: Chapey R, ed. Language Intervention Strategies in Adult Aphasia. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994:338–357.
   Google Scholar
• Skelly M. Amer-Ind Gestural Code Base on Universal American Indian Hand Talk. New York: Elsevier; 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson SW, Damasio H, Damasio AR, Klima E, Bellugi U, Brandt JR Acquisition of signs from American sign language in hearing individuals fol-lowing left hemisphere damage and aphasia. Neuropsychologia. 1992;30:329–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothi LIG, Heilman KM. Ideomotor apraxia: gestur-al learning and memory. In: Roy EA, ed. Neuropsychological Studies in Apraxia and Related Disorders. New York: Oxford University Press; 1985;65–74.
   Google Scholar
• Maher LM, Ochipa C. Management and treatment of limb apraxia. In: Rothi LIG, Heilman KM, eds. Apraxia: The Neuropsychology of Action. Hove: Psychology Press; 1997;75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks N, Albert ML. Manual of Aphasia Therapy. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Weinrich M, Boser KI, McCall D. Representation of linguistic rules in the brain: evidence from training an aphasic patient to produce past tense verb mor-phology. Brain Lang. 1999;70:144–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrich M, Steele RD, Carlson GS, et al. Processing of visual syntax in a globally aphasic patient. Brain Lang. 1989;36:391–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinrich M, Shelton JR, Cox DM, McCall D. Remediating production of tense morphology improves verb retrieval in chronic aphasia. Brain Lang. 1997;58:23–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albert ML, Bachman DL, Morgan A, Helm-Estabrooks N. Pharmacotherapy for aphasia. Neurology. 1988;38:877–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold M, VanDam D, Silliman ER. An open-label tri-al of bromocriptine in nonfluent aphasia: a qualita-tive analysis of word storage and retrieval. Brain Lang. 2000;74:141–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta SR, Mlcoch AG, Scolaro C, Moritz T. Bromocriptine treatment of nonfluent aphasia. Neurology. 1995;45:2170–2173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragoni M, Altieri M, DiPiero V, Padovani A, Mostardini C, Lenzi GL. Bromocriptine and speech therapy in non-fluent chronic aphasia after stroke. Neurol Sci. 2000;21:19–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymer AM, Bandy D, Adair JC, Schwartz RL, Williamson DJ, Rothi LIG, Heilman KM. Effects of bromocriptine in a patient with crossed aphasia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:139–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLennan DL, Nicholas LE, Morley GK, Brookshire RH. The effects of bromocriptine on speech and lan-guage function in a man with transcortical motor aphasia. In: Prescott TE, ed. Clinical Aphasiology, Vol 20. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed; 1991:145–155.
   Google Scholar
• Sabe L, Salvarezza F, Garcia Cuerva A, Leiguarda R, Starkstein S. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of bromocriptine in nonfluent aphasia. Neurology. 1995;45:2272–2274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs DH, Shuren J, Gold M, et al. Physostigmine pharmacotherapy for anomia. Neurocase. 1996; 2:83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y, Miyazaki M, Albert ML. Effects of increased cholingergic activity on naming in apha-sia. Lancet. 1997;350:116–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes JD, Jacobs DH, Heilman KM. Neu ropharmacology and linguistic neuroplasticity. Brain Lang. 2000;71:96–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard D, Patterson K, Franklin S, Orchard-Lisle V, Morton J. Treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia. Brain. 1985;108:817–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy JP. Connectionist modeling of semantic deficits. In: Best W, Bryan K, Maxim J, eds. Semantic Processing: Theory and Practice. London: Whurr Publishers; 2000:28–51.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau SE. Connectionist models and language. In: Nadeau SE, Rothi LIG, Crosson B, eds. Aphasia and Language: Theory to Practice. New York: Guilford Press; 2000:299–347.
   Google Scholar
• Kiran S, Thompson CK. The role of semantic com-plexity in treatment of naming deficits: training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. I Speech Lang Hearing Res. 2003;46:608–622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin N, Laine M, Harley TA. How can connec-tionist cognitive models of language inform mod-els of language rehabilitation? In: Hillis AE, ed. The Handbook of Adult Language Disorders. New York: Psychology Press; 2002:375–396.
   Google Scholar
• Shuren J, Geldmacher D, Heilman KM. Nonoptic aphasia: aphasia with preserved confrontation naming in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1990;43: 1900–1907.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson CJ, Paivio A, Clark JM. Cognitive compo-nents of picture naming. Psychol Bull. 1996;120: 113–139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson CK, Faroqi-Shah Y. Models of sentence production. In: Hillis AE, ed. The Handbook of Adult Language Disorders. New York: Psychology Press; 2002:311–330.
   Google Scholar
• Williams SE, Canter GI. The influence of situational context on naming performance in aphasic syn-dromes. Brain Lang. 1982;17:92–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingeser LB, Berndt RS. Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain Lang. 1990;39:14–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt RS, Haendiges AN. Grammatical class in word and sentence production: evidence from an aphasic patient. I Memory Lang. 2000;43:249–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall D, Cox DM, Shelton JR, Weinrich M. The influence of syntactic and semantic information on picture-naming performance in aphasic patients. Aphasiology. 1997;11:581–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. The Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Obler LK, Albert ML. Action naming test. Unpublished test. 1986.
   Google Scholar